Learner-Centered Education for Sustainable Development: The Academic and Policy Implication of Research on China College Student Learning
-
摘要: 注重以"学"（学生、学习、学校）为本，提高人才培养质量，是实现高等教育内涵发展的核心要义。本研究通过梳理国内外有关大学生学习研究的主要理论和成果，总结清华大学"中国大学生学习与发展追踪研究"（China College Student Survey，CCSS）十年来在学术研究和实践改革中积累的经验与思考，结合新时代中国高等教育发展的需要与前景，提出具有中国特色的大学生学情研究的整体分析框架，并阐释大学生学情研究的学术涵义与政策价值。
-
关键词:
- 大学生学情研究 /
- 大学生学习投入 /
- 高等教育内涵式发展 /
- 中国大学生学习与发展追踪研究(CCSS)
Abstract: Quality improvement through learner-centered education is the core of the sustainable develop-ment in higher education. This study is based on a review of some related theories and researches on college student learning and the experience of China College Student Survey (CCSS) over the past decade in educa-tional research and practice. Additionally, a holistic analytical framework of student learning with Chinese characteristics is developed and the policy and academic implications of the study have been discussed in the paper. -
[1] 傅承哲. (2012).本土化学生学习调查工具的开发初探.复旦教育论坛, 10(3), 43-47. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/97430A/201203/42086089.html [2] 龚放, 吕林海. (2012).中美研究型大学本科生学习参与差异的研究——基于南京大学和加州大学伯克利分校的问卷调查.高等教育研究, 33(9), 90-100. http://statics.scnu.edu.cn/pics/jwcshpg/2015/0916/1442370204822810.pdf [3] 贵州大学. (2016-11-24). 贵州大学2015年度本科教学质量报告. 2018-01-12. 取自http://www.gzu.edu.cn/picture/article/2/63/5f/0f427c6148deb4fdce89ba5d7d9a/c0d46a2c-d552-4b6d-adcc-37dfcad1f33e.pdf. [4] 华东师范大学学报教育科学版. (2018-03-10). "交叉融合的教育科学基础研究暨自然科学基金项目研讨会"举行. 2018-03-11. 取自http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/buWr0PtcsVBzMIXJ9Y-J8Q. [5] 林惠青. (2017-11-13). 努力开创高等教育发展新局面. 中国教育报, 001版, 1-2. [6] 陆根书, 胡文静, 闫妮. (2013).大学生学习经历:概念模型与基本特征——基于西安交通大学本科生学习经历的调查分析.高等教育研究, 34(8), 53-61. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WJZZ201416047.htm [7] 罗燕, 海蒂·罗斯, 岑逾豪. (2009).国际比较视野中的高等教育测量——NSSE-China工具的开发:文化适应与信度、效度报告.复旦教育论坛, 7(5), 12-18. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-YBJY201503003.htm [8] 罗燕, 史静寰, 涂冬波. (2009).清华大学本科教育学情调查报告2009——与美国顶尖研究型大学的比较.清华大学教育研究, 5, 1-13. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/96571X/200905/32441584.html [9] 吕林海, 张红霞. (2015).中国研究型大学本科生学习参与的特征分析——基于12所中外研究型大学调查资料的比较.教育研究, 9, 51-63. http://paper.usc.cuhk.edu.hk/Details.aspx?id=10094 [10] 吕林海. (2016).大学生学习参与的理论缘起、概念延展及测量方法争议.教育发展研究, 21, 70-77. http://www.doc88.com/p-0949693440948.html [11] 南京理工大学课题组. (2016-01-08). 学情调查数据在实践中的应用. CCSS 2015年度数据分析研讨会上的发言, 北京. [12] 清华大学. (2013-09-27). 清华大学第24次教育工作讨论会开幕. 2018-03-29. 取自http://news.tsinghua.edu.cn/publish/thunews/9948/2013/20130927173455499728551/20130927173455499728551_.html. [13] 清华大学. (2018-03-29). 清华大学第25次教育工作讨论会开幕. 2018-03-29. 取自http://news.tsinghua.edu.cn/publish/thunews/9648/2018/20180329192748224920128/20180329192748224920128_.html. [14] 瞿振元. (2013).高等教育内涵式发展的实现途径.中国高等教育, 2, 12-13, 21. https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/56e58af649649b6648d74783-3.html [15] 上海师范大学高等教育研究所项目组. (2016).大学生学习性投入的理论与实践.上海:上海教育出版社. [16] 史静寰. (2016).走向质量治理:中国大学生学情调查的现状与发展.中国高教研究, 2, 37-41. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zghgxyj201602005 [17] 史秋衡, 郭建鹏. (2012).我国大学生学情状态与影响机制的实证分析.教育研究, 2, 109-121. http://dspace.xmu.edu.cn/dspace/bitstream/handle/2288/19592/%e6%88%91%e5%9b%bd%e5%a4%a7%e5%ad%a6%e7%94%9f%e5%ad%a6%e6%83%85%e7%8a%b6%e6%80%81%e4%b8%8e%e5%bd%b1%e5%93%8d%e6%9c%ba%e5%88%b6%e7%9a%84%e5%ae%9e%e8%af%81%e5%88%86%e6%9e%90.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [18] 涂冬波, 史静寰, 郭芳芳. (2013).中国大学生学习性投入调查问卷的测量学研究.复旦教育论坛, 1, 55-62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0059.2013.01.011 [19] 汪雅霜. (2013).大学生学习投入度的实证研究——基于2012年"国家大学生学习情况调查"数据分析.中国高教研究, 1, 32-36. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zghgxyj201301006 [20] 王文, 张清, 史静寰. (2014).基于学习过程的基础学科拔尖人才培养研究——以山东大学泰山学堂为例.大学教育科学, 2, 58-64. https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/40dcf759b52acfc789ebc970.html [21] 王战军. (2013).推进内涵式发展提高高等教育质量.北京联合大学学报, 27(2), 1-5. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hbkjdxxb-shkxb201204014 [22] 魏署光, 陈敏. (2016).本科生学习效果影响机制研究——基于华中科技大学SSLD的分析.高等工程教育研究, 2, 167-173. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/GDGJ201602032.htm [23] 文雯, 管浏斯. (2012).自主招生学生大学学习过程初探——以九所"985"、"211"高校自主招生群体为例的实证研究.清华大学教育研究, 33(3), 98-104. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=qhdxjyyj201203015 [24] 新华网. (2018-03-11). 刘伟: 高等教育自信是文化自信的有机组成部分. 2018-03-29. 取自http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2018lh/2018-03/11/c_129827408.htm. [25] 吴岩. (2014).高等教育公共治理与"五位一体"评估制度创新.中国高教研究, 12, 14-18. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-LBYT201425037.htm [26] 徐波. (2013).高校学生投入:从理论到实践.教育研究, 7, 147-154. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-JYYJ201307019.htm [27] 杨立军, 韩晓玲. (2014).基于NSSE-CHINA问卷的大学生学习投入结构研究.复旦教育论坛, 12(3), 83-90. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=fdjylt201403014 [28] 杨钋, 许申. (2010).本专科学生能力发展的对比研究——基于"2008年首都高校学生发展状况调查"相关数据的分析.教育发展研究, 5, 17-22. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-YANG201509011.htm [29] 尹弘飚. (2016).大学生学习投入的研究路径及其转型.高等教育研究, 11, 70-76. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10533-2010186095.htm [30] 曾家延. (2017).指向大规模测量建构的学生参与研究评析.比较教育研究, 4, 46-53. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/magadetail/BJJY201704.htm [31] 张娜. (2012).国内外学习投入及其学校影响因素研究综述.心理研究, 5(2), 83-92. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/88887X/201202/41478547.html [32] 中国高等教育学会专题研究组.(2017).走向2030:中国高等教育现代化建设之路.中国高教研究, 5, 1-14. [33] 中国青年网. (2018-03-08). 全国政协委员张炜: 高等教育既要重数量也要重质量. 2018-03-29. 取自http://news.youth.cn/2018qglhyc/201803/t20180308_11480538.htm. [34] 中青在线. (2018-03-05). 吕建代表: 追求内涵式发展的高等教育没有休止符. 2018-03-29. 取自http://news.cyol.com/content/2018-03/05/content_16992553.htm. [35] 赵炬明. (2018). 聚焦设计: 实践与方法——美国以学生为中心的本科教学改革研究之三(下), 高等工程教育研究, 3. 2018-04-03. 取自http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/EP1SGM5ETmNAdSNm-dYO8g. [36] 周廷勇, 周作宇, 杜瑞军. (2016).大学生发展的影响因素模型:一个理论构想.教育学报. 12(5), 68-80. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10445-1013217511.htm [37] 周廷勇, 周作宇. (2012).高校学生发展影响因素的探索性研究.复旦教育论坛, 10(3), 48-55, 86. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-GWZX201203012.htm [38] 朱红. (2010).高校学生参与度及其成长的影响机制——十年首都大学生发展数据分析.清华大学教育研究, 31(6), 35-43, 63. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=qhdxjyyj201006004 [39] Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement:Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427-445. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002 [40] Arnett, J. J. (1997). Young people's conceptions of the transition to adulthood. Youth & Society, 29(1):2-23. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=a2a153974b5fd1a720cc305b58d506be&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [41] Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood:A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5):469-480. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469 [42] Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement:A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=612fd970c97c0391cb8f0b0492d80f44&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [43] Astin, A. W. (1993). What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=354b5cfa9fe8992a8c037db9f7acfced&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [44] Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Appleton, J. J., Berman, S., Spanjers, D., & Varro, P. (2008). Best practices in fostering student engagement. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds. ), Best practices in school psychology (5th ed. ). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists. http://iteractive.ca/2015/04/best-practices-in-fostering-student-engagement/ [45] Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Washington, DC:National Center for Education Statistics. [46] Finn, J. D. (2006). The adult lives of at-risk students:The roles of attainment and engagement in high school (NCES 2006-328). Washington, DC:National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=b004306f6cf7e4a4f4406cd59b8bc6e4&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [47] Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement:Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059 [48] Fryer, L., & Gijbels, D. (2017). Student Learning in Higher Education:Where We Are and Paths Forward. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 199-203. doi: 10.1007/s10648-017-9415-5 [49] Hu, S. & Kuh, G.D. (2003). Diversity Experiences and College Student Learning and Development. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 320-334. doi: 10.1353/csd.2003.0026 [50] Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 758-773. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.598505 [51] Kezar, A., & J. Kinzie. (2006). Examining the ways institutions create student engagement:The role of mission. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 149-172. doi: 10.1353/csd.2006.0018 [52] Khan, P. E. (2014). Theorising student engagement in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 40, 1005-1018. doi: 10.1002/berj.3121 [53] Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement:Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5-20. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=2be8294d6440cb6ce24c98c92c06289a&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [54] Luo, Y. (2015). Learning ants: A portrait of Chinese college students in mass higher education. In J. C. Shin, G. A. Postiglione, & F. Huang (Eds. ), Mass higher education development in East Asia: Strategy, quality, and challenges (pp. 177-188). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yan_Luo28/publication/283522444_Learning_Ants_A_Portrait_of_Chinese_College_Students_in_Mass_Higher_Education/links/56c5404208aea564e304e1c0.pdf?origin=publication_list [55] McCormick, A. C., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2013). Student engagement: Bridging research and practice to improve the quality of undergraduate education. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed. ), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, (Vol. 28, pp. 47-92). Dordrecht: Springer. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f65c/5572e003fa50717f294594b33686dab725a7.pdf [56] National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). (2018). About NSSE. 2018-01-10. 取自http://nsse.indiana.edu/html/about.cfm. [57] Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & S. Lamborn. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools, ed. F. M. Newmann, (pp. 11-39). New York: Teachers College Press. [58] Pace, C. R. (1980). Measuring the quality of student effort. Current Issues in Higher Education, 2, 10-16. [59] Pace, C. R. (1984). Measuring the quality of college student experiences. An account of the development and use of the College Student Experiences Questionnaire. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=3ea095298d3b63096622e8f258bc91e0&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [60] Pascarella, E. T. (1985). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis. In: Smart, J. C. (ed. ) Higher education: Handbook of theory and research. (pp. 1-62). New York: Agathon. [61] Pike, G. R. & Kuh, G. D. (2005). A typology of student engagement for American colleges and universities. Research in Higher Education, 2, 285-209. [62] Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385-407. doi: 10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x [63] Richardson, J. T. E. (2004). Methodological Issues in Questionnaire-Based Research on Student Learning in Higher Education. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 347-358. doi: 10.1007/s10648-004-0004-z [64] Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College:Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press. [65] Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning:Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 359-384. doi: 10.1007/s10648-004-0005-y [66] Yazzie-Mintz, E., & McCormick, K. (2012). Finding the humanity in the data: Understanding, measuring and strengthening student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds. ), Handbook of research on student engagement. (pp. 743-761). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_36 [67] Wang, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement:A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002 [68] Zepke, N. (2014). Student engagement research in higher education:Questioning an academic orthodoxy. Teaching in Higher Education, 19, 697-708. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2014.901956 [69] Zepke, N. (2015). Student engagement research thinking beyond the mainstream. Higher Education Research and Development, 34, 1311-1323. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2015.1024635 [70] Zusho, A. (2017). Toward an Integrated Model of Student Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 301-324. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=2f8e31b3d6b3aa5be1e047d63de17d3c&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 237
- HTML全文浏览量: 426
- PDF下载量: 355
- 被引次数: 0