Autonomy-Support: Transformation of Teaching Styles

MA Siteng; ZHAO Qian; JIAO Xinran

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.01.002

Volume 36 Issue 1

Jan. 2018

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences) > 2018 > 36(1): 15-21+159

MA Siteng, ZHAO Qian, JIAO Xinran. Autonomy-Support: Transformation of Teaching Styles[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2018, 36(1): 15-21+159. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.01.002

Citation:

MA Siteng, ZHAO Qian, JIAO Xinran. Autonomy-Support: Transformation of Teaching Styles[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2018, 36(1): 15-21+159. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.01.002

Citation:

PDF( 1229 KB)

Autonomy-Support: Transformation of Teaching Styles

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.01.002

1.
Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2.
Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Publish Date: 2018-01-20

Abstract

Abstract

According to self-determination theory, teachers' autonomy support refers to teachers' specific teaching styles, which help to reduce the control and pressure of students in support of students' self-development. In this study, autonomy support is addressed from three dimensions:encouraging independent thinking, establishing meaningful relevance, and supporting development of interest. Using the quantitative research method to investigate the status quo of teachers' level of autonymsupport, we explored the influential factors through regression analysis. The findings indicated an overall high level of autonomy support in teaching, but relatively poor performance in development of interest. Different teachers had significantly different scores, depending on their locations, genders and teaching abilities. Besides, teaching efficacy, teaching autonomy, opportunities of professional development and participation in decision-making can significantly affect teachers' level of autonomy support.Finally, this study put forward some suggestions regarding improving teachers' level of autonomy support, such as putting emphasis on teacher professional development, reforming evaluation system, protecting teachers' autonomy.
- transformation of teaching styles,
- autonomy-support teaching,
- teaching efficacy,
- teaching autonomy,

FullText(HTML)

References(34)

References

[1]	陈继文. (2014). 教师自主支持与初中生的学习: 家庭社会阶层与自主动机的影响. 武汉: 华中师范大学硕士论文.
[2]	褚宏启. (2016).核心素养的国际视野与中国立场——21世纪中国的国民素质提升与教育目标转型.教育研究, (11), 8-18. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=jyyj201611003&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
[3]	高晓文, 盛慧. (2014).教师的"言"和"行"如何支持自主探究性学习.教师教育研究, 26(4), 81-86. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=gdsz201404014&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
[4]	葛春洋. (2013). 教师自主支持影响因素的研究. 南京: 南京师范大学硕士论文.
[5]	韩文珠, 李宝庆. (2012).农村初中教师教学方式转变的阻力与化解对策.教育理论与实践, (5), 25-27. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=jyll201205009&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
[6]	李涛, 于涛. (2015).影响教师自主支持行为的因素.长春教育学院学报, (15), 107-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6531.2015.15.048
[7]	林成堂. (2008).中小学教师参与学校决策现状的调查研究.教育理论与实践, (32), 44-46. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=jyll200832019&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
[8]	刘海燕, 闫荣双, 郭德俊. (2003).认知动机理论的新近展——自我决定论.心理科学, 26(6), 1115-1116. http://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/86b96f1dfad6195f312ba655.html
[9]	孙灯勇, 王梅, 满丛英. (2014).教师自评自主支持和班级目标结构对学生学习成绩的影响.心理研究, 7(5), 93-96. http://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/b57f1bca76c66137ef061954-2.html
[10]	姚计海, 申继亮. (2007).中小学教师教学自主权量表的修订.应用心理学, 13(4), 329-333. http://edu.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/Detail/yyxlx200704007
[11]	张辉蓉, 贾瑜. (2014).教育环境对教师教学方式选择与运用影响程度的实证分析.课程·教材·教法, (8), 32-37. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=kjjf201408008&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
[12]	张婷. (2010).由"杜郎口模式"看新课改教师困境与改革一元化问题.天津市教科院学报, (5), 68-69. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=tjsjkyxb201005024
[13]	邹文篪, 田青, 刘佳. (2012). "投桃报李"——互惠理论的组织行为学研究述评.心理科学进展, 20(11), 1879-1888. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xlxdt201211019
[14]	Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys:The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15, 397-413. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.008
[15]	Cherniss C. (1997). Teacher empowerment, consultation, and the creation of new programs in schools. Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation, 8(2), 135-152. doi: 10.1207/s1532768xjepc0802_3?tab=permissions&scroll=top
[16]	DeCharms, R. (1976). Enhancing motivation:Change in the classroom. New York:Irvington.
[17]	Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M.(2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits:Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
[18]	Entwistle, N., & Mccune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325-345. doi: 10.1007/s10648-004-0003-0
[19]	Findings, K. (2014). Pisa 2012 results:Creative problem solving:students' skills in tackling real-life problems (volume v). OECD.
[20]	Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal, 86 (2), 217-247. doi: 10.1086/461445
[21]	Leroy, N., Bressoux, P., Sarrazin, P., & Trouilloud, D. (2007). Impact of teachers' implicit theories and perceived pressures on the establishment of an autonomy supportive climate. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(4), 529-545. doi: 10.1007/BF03173470
[22]	Nachtscheim, N. M., & Hoy, W. K. (1976). Authoritarian personality and control ideologies of teachers. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 22, 173-178. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1976-28639-001
[23]	Newby, T. J. (1991). Classroom motivation:Strategies of first-year teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 195-200. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.195
[24]	OECD. (2013). Pisa 2012 results:What students know and can do:Student performance in mathematics, reading and science. OECD.
[25]	Pearson L. C., Hall B. W.(1993). Initial Construct Validation of the Teaching Autonomy Scale. The Journal of Educational Research, 86(3), 172-178. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1993.9941155
[26]	Pelletier, L. G., Seguin-Levesque, C., & Legault, L. (2002). Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers' motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 186. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-02073-017
[27]	Reeve, J. (1998). Autonomy support as an interpersonal motivating style:Is it teachable?. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 312-330. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1997.0975
[28]	Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159-175. doi: 10.1080/00461520903028990
[29]	Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209-218. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-02666-017
[30]	Roth, G., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Kaplan, H. (2007). Autonomous motivation for teaching:How self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 761-774. http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/edu/99/4/761/
[31]	Short, P. M., & Rinehart, J. S. (1992). School participant empowerment scale:Assessment of level of empowerment within the school environment. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 52 (4), 951-960. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ458540
[32]	Tessier D., Sarrazin P., Ntoumanis N. (2010). The effect of an intervention to improve newly qualified teachers' interpersonal style, students motivation and psychological need satisfaction in sport-based physical education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(4), 242-253. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.05.005
[33]	Vaughn, L., & Baker, R. (2001). Teaching in the medical setting:balancing teaching styles, learning styles and teaching methods. Medical Teacher, 23(6), 610-612. doi: 10.1080/01421590120091000
[34]	Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students:A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 767-779. http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/8636897