The Implication of Education Justice in Teaching Students Based on Their Aptitude

HE Juling

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.02.012

Volume 36 Issue 2

Mar. 2018

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences) > 2018 > 36(2): 110-116+157

HE Juling. The Implication of Education Justice in Teaching Students Based on Their Aptitude[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2018, 36(2): 110-116+157. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.02.012

Citation:

HE Juling. The Implication of Education Justice in Teaching Students Based on Their Aptitude[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2018, 36(2): 110-116+157. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.02.012

Citation:

PDF( 570 KB)

The Implication of Education Justice in Teaching Students Based on Their Aptitude

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.02.012

HE Juling

School of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062, China

Publish Date: 2018-03-20

Abstract

Abstract

Teaching students based on their aptitude is not only a teaching principle, but also an educa-tional principle throughout the whole process of education practice. In essence, teaching students based on their aptitude embodies education justice. Teaching students based on their aptitude reflects the legitimacy and justification of the relationship between educators and students. Its fundamental purpose is to achieve what education means to be. The prerequisite of teaching students based on their aptitude is to respect and ac-knowledge the individuality and characteristics of students and to deliver targeted and tailored education based on these differences and characteristics. The fundamental purpose is to ensure every student can start from where they are and become a better self and a true human being with human qualities. Education for this pur-pose is justice education, which is the implication of teaching students based on their aptitude.
- teaching students based on their aptitude,
- justice,
- equality,
- education justice,
- education e-quality

FullText(HTML)

References(20)

References

[1]	程颐. (1935). 河南程氏遗书(卷十九)(朱熹编). 北京: 商务印书馆.
[2]	范梅南. (2001). 教学机智—教育智慧的意蕴(李树英译). 北京: 教育科学出版社.
[3]	何菊玲.(2010).教师专业成长的现象学旨趣.教育研究, (11), 88-94. http://edu.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/Detail/7451819
[4]	霍耐特. (2005). 为承认而斗争(胡继华译). 上海: 上海世纪出版集团.
[5]	加德纳. (1999). 多元智能(沈致隆译). 北京: 新华出版社.
[6]	金生鈜.(2011)教育正义, 教育制度建构的奠基性价值.陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (2), 157-164.
[7]	康奈尔.(1997).教育、社会公正与知识.华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), (2), 62-71. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/86932X/199702/4001010158.html
[8]	联合国教科文组织. (1998). 财富—教育蕴藏其中(联合国教科文组织中文科译). 北京: 教育科学出版社.
[9]	刘震.(1984).《学记》释义.济南:山东教育出版社.
[10]	舒志定.(2015).马克思正义批判语境中的教育正义.教育研究, (7), 4-10, 63.
[11]	苏霍姆林斯基.(1998).把整个心灵献给孩子见育人三部曲.北京:人民教育出版社.
[12]	苏霍姆林斯基. (2001). 苏霍姆林斯基选集: 第2卷. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
[13]	吴式颖, 任钟印.(2002).外国教育思想通史, 第2卷:古希腊、罗马的教育思想.长沙:湖南教育出版社.
[14]	辛志凤, 蒋玉斌等. (2003). 墨子译注. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江人民出版社.
[15]	杨伯峻. (1960). 孟子译注. 北京: 中华书局.
[16]	杨伯峻. (1980). 论语译注. 北京: 中华书局.
[17]	赵汀阳. (2008). 教育最重要的就是自由. 2008-12-16. 取自: http://www.aisixiang.com/data/23322.html.
[18]	赵汀阳.(2010).论可能生活.北京:中国人民大学出版社.
[19]	朱熹. (1983). 四书章句集注·论语集注(卷十三). 北京: 中华书局.
[20]	佐藤学. (2012). 教师的挑战—宁静的课堂革命(钟启泉, 陈静静译). 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.