中国人文社会科学核心期刊

中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊

中文核心期刊

Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 36 Issue 3
Apr.  2018
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Jianshi. The Improvement of Percentile Band Score: Experience, Restriction and Possible Direction[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2018, 36(3): 79-86+168+169. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.03.008
Citation: ZHANG Jianshi. The Improvement of Percentile Band Score: Experience, Restriction and Possible Direction[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2018, 36(3): 79-86+168+169. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.03.008

The Improvement of Percentile Band Score: Experience, Restriction and Possible Direction

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.03.008
  • Publish Date: 2018-05-20
  • The score comparability of different subjects in Gaokao reform has always been a big concern in recent years. Experience in some provinces shows that standard score reform is not a proper solution to this problem because of its technical flaws in the process of score conversion. Percentile band score, despite some restrictions like using total raw score in admission, seems a compromised choice. To some extent, percentile band score, as a kind of simplified standard score, makes it possible to compare the scores of different subjects before adding them together while leaving some negative influence on teaching and learning. However, technically, percentile band score still needs improving given the existing practice of using Gaokao scores.
  • loading
  • [1]
    戴海崎等.(2006).心理与教育测量.广州:暨南大学出版社.
    [2]
    冯向东.(2012).教育科学的理论与实践逻辑——关于布迪厄"实践逻辑"的方法论意蕴.高等教育研究, (2), 13-19. http://www.docin.com/p-523762899.html
    [3]
    郭小川.(2002).带着读者的疑问听瞿司长讲那高考的事.高校招生, (2), 6-7. http://mjlsh.usc.cuhk.edu.hk/book.aspx?cid=6&tid=157&pid=2768
    [4]
    扈涛等.(1994).标准分制度及其应用.北京:科普出版社.
    [5]
    黄光扬.(1997).高考标准分的线性转换与正态化转换.统计教育, (6), 18-19. http://www.doc88.com/p-3015672416006.html
    [6]
    黄晓慧. (2013-12-04). 标准分, 还能挺多久. 人民日报, (12).
    [7]
    陕西省标准分改革专家组. (1995). 标准分及其应用. 西安: 陕西省考试管理中心.
    [8]
    宋吉祥等.(2017).三种典型分数分布形态下等级赋分方式的比较.考试研究, (1), 76-84. http://www.doc88.com/p-0631398485561.html
    [9]
    杨志明.(2015).高考原始分合成:问题与改进思路.教育测量与评价, (10), 63-66.
    [10]
    章建石.(2016).一项公平与效率兼备的高考改革为什么难以为继?——标准分制度的变迁及其折射的治理困境.北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 31-41. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=bjsfdxxb-shkx201601003
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(4)  / Tables(1)

    Article views (216) PDF downloads(477) Cited by()
    Proportional views

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return