中国人文社会科学核心期刊

中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊

中文核心期刊

Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 36 Issue 6
Nov.  2018
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
JIANG Yong, LIU Jiawei, DAI Naien. On the Difference of the Phenomenological Paradigm and Positivism Paradigm of Educational Research[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2018, 36(6): 61-68. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.06.006
Citation: JIANG Yong, LIU Jiawei, DAI Naien. On the Difference of the Phenomenological Paradigm and Positivism Paradigm of Educational Research[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2018, 36(6): 61-68. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.06.006

On the Difference of the Phenomenological Paradigm and Positivism Paradigm of Educational Research

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.06.006
  • Publish Date: 2018-11-20
  • Pedagogy, with its distinctive cultural characteristics and attributes of discipline, is not only a social science, but also a spiritual science. This paper explores the differences between the phenomenological educational research and the educational research of positivism from the theoretical perspective of seeing and thinking. "Seeing" the "probability" theory and "ductility" theory help distinguish the essential difference between "essence intuition" and objective gaze. After comparing the technical orientation and spiritual growth orientation of thinking, the authors elaborate the thinking path of education research under the guidance of phenomenological theory. And from the triple structure of ego-cogito-cogitatum, the authors argue that phenomenological paradigm focuses on the subject's thinking of existence and thinking of freedom, which will strengthen its own non-reflective self-consciousness and eventually pull off from the objectification vision of the wrong path.
  • loading
  • [1]
    安道玉.(2009).解析胡塞尔的"视域"概念.河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 36(4), 27-29. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hnsfdxxb-zxshkxb200904007
    [2]
    北京大学哲学系外国哲学史教研室编译.(1981).西方哲学原著选读.北京: 商务印书馆.
    [3]
    单斌.(2015).空间与视域——从胡塞尔空间现象学的视角看.安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (6), 44-49. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=ADZS201506008&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
    [4]
    方向红.(2013).胡塞尔和海德格尔时间现象学的导入性问题与顶层概念.江苏行政学院学报, (6), 12-18. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1009-8860.2013.06.002
    [5]
    龚剑飞.(2012).论马克思和恩格斯对实证主义的总体批判.社会科学研究, (6), 129-134. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1000-4769.2012.06.024
    [6]
    高维杰.(2006).胡塞尔《纯粹现象学通论》中的我思与纯粹自我.求实, (S1), 124-125. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qs2006z1063
    [7]
    胡塞尔.(1995).欧洲科学的危机和超验现象学(张庆熊译).上海: 上海译文出版社.
    [8]
    胡塞尔.(1994).现象学的方法(倪梁康译).上海: 上海译文出版社.
    [9]
    胡塞尔.(1992).纯粹现象学通论(李幼蒸译).北京: 商务印书馆.
    [10]
    胡塞尔.(1988).欧洲科学危机和超验现象学(张庆熊译).上海: 上海译文出版社.
    [11]
    康德.(1978).任何一种能够作为科学出现的未来形而上学导论(庞景仁译).北京: 商务印书馆.
    [12]
    刘洁.(2016).乌特勒支学派的产生及其特点.比较教育研究, (9), 79-84. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJJY201609013.htm
    [13]
    刘胜利.(2015).时间现象学的中庸之道——《知觉现象学》的时间观初探.北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (5), 141-149. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/81274X/201504/665579242.html
    [14]
    中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局.(1973).马克思恩格斯全集:第33卷.北京:人民出版社.
    [15]
    孙亮.(2007).思入现代性——晚期胡塞尔科学之思解读.理论界, (2), 183-187. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1003-6547.2007.02.082
    [16]
    余平.(2003).海德格尔存在之思的伦理境域.哲学研究, (10), 63-68. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=NSSD201408050000741747
    [17]
    张祥龙.(2016).什么是现象学.社会科学战线, (5), 1-10. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Thesis/Y869480
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views (262) PDF downloads(258) Cited by()
    Proportional views

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return