The Influence of Information Feature and Regulatory Orientation on Undergraduates' Entrepreneurial Risk Decisions

ZHANG Min; WANG Minmin

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.01.004

Volume 37 Issue 1

Jan. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences) > 2019 > 37(1): 30-36

ZHANG Min, WANG Minmin. The Influence of Information Feature and Regulatory Orientation on Undergraduates' Entrepreneurial Risk Decisions[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2019, 37(1): 30-36. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.01.004

Citation:

ZHANG Min, WANG Minmin. The Influence of Information Feature and Regulatory Orientation on Undergraduates' Entrepreneurial Risk Decisions[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2019, 37(1): 30-36. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.01.004

Citation:

PDF( 1582 KB)

The Influence of Information Feature and Regulatory Orientation on Undergraduates' Entrepreneurial Risk Decisions

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.01.004

ZHANG Min¹,
WANG Minmin²

1.
Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
2.
Hangzhou Polytechnic, Hangzhou 311402, China

Publish Date: 2019-01-20

Abstract

Abstract

Undergraduates' entrepreneurial risk decisions can be influenced by individual psychological regulatory focus and external information feature. Prevention-oriented undergraduates have the tendency to mitigate risks, while promotion-oriented undergraduates tend to face risks. Under fuzzy representation, undergraduates have the preference for mitigating risks, while they tend to face the risks under precise representation. External information feature and individual physical regulatory orientation interactively affect risk decisions. Entrepreneurship education in higher education institutions should focus on individual psychological diversity and information feature diversity, improving effectiveness of entrepreneurship education.
- entrepreneurial risk decisions,
- regulatory orientation,
- precise/fuzzy information,
- interactivity

FullText(HTML)

References(16)

References

[1]	段锦云.(2008).基于认知惰性的创业风险决策框架效应双维认知机制研究.杭州: 浙江大学博士学位论文.
[2]	麦可思研究院.(2017).2017年中国大学生就业报告.取自: http://baike.sogou.com/v164959457.htm.
[3]	清华大学二十国集团创业研究中心.(2018).全球创业观察(GEM)2016/2017中国报告.取自: http://www.sohu.com/a/219753985_696731.
[4]	王鉴忠, 等.(2017).全球创业观察(GEM)项目研究回顾与展望.辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 45(5), 71-82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3291.2017.05.010
[5]	姚琦, 乐国安, 伍承聪, 李燕飞, 陈晨.(2008).调节定向的测量维度及其问卷的信度和效度检验.应用心理学, 14(4), 318-323. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2008.04.005
[6]	张凤华, 方侠辉, 刘书培.(2015).决策框架和调节定向对模糊规避的影响.中国临床心理学杂志, 23(6), 963-967. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zglcxlxzz201506004
[7]	张敏, 王敏敏.(2017).大学生就业/创业的抉择:基于调节定向与信息框架效应的视角.高等教育研究, 38(9), 78-83. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HIGH201709013.htm
[8]	Aidis, R., Estrin, S., &Mickiewicz, T. (2008).Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia:A comparative perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 656-672. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.005
[9]	Arenius, P., &Clercq, D. D.(2005).A Network-based approach on opportunity recognition. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 249-265. doi: 10.1007/s11187-005-1988-6
[10]	Brixy, U., Sternberg, R., &Stüber, H. (2013).Why some nascent entrepreneurs do not seek professional assistance. Applied Economics Letters, 20(2), 157-161. doi: 10.1080/13504851.2012.684783
[11]	Friedman, R. S., &Forster, J. (2001).The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001-1013. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001
[12]	Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A.(2001).Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success:Promotion prideversus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3-23. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=c4a41eba02f4afb7a294737d953ab678&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
[13]	Keren, G., &Gerritsen, L. E. M. (1999). On the robustness and possible accounts of ambiguity aversion. Acta Psychologica, 103, 149-172. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00034-7
[14]	Kramer, K. M., &Budescu, D.V. (2005). Exploring ellsberg's paradox in vague-vague cases. In Zwick, R., & Rapoport, A. (eds). Experimental business research, vol. 3. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 131-154.
[15]	Molden, D.C., &Finkel, E.J. (2010).Motivations for promotion and prevention and the role of trust and commitment in interpersonal forgiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46 (2), 255-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.014
[16]	Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. (1981).The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211 (4481), 453-458. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/OAPaper/oai_pubmedcentral.nih.gov_3191503