A Foreign Lever: Dewey in China's Education Reform in the 1920s

Zhong Jianwei; Tu Yue

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.02.004

Volume 37 Issue 2

Mar. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences) > 2019 > 37(2): 37-44

Zhong Jianwei, Tu Yue. A Foreign Lever: Dewey in China's Education Reform in the 1920s[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2019, 37(2): 37-44. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.02.004

Citation:

Zhong Jianwei, Tu Yue. A Foreign Lever: Dewey in China's Education Reform in the 1920s[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2019, 37(2): 37-44. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.02.004

Citation:

PDF( 564 KB)

A Foreign Lever: Dewey in China's Education Reform in the 1920s

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.02.004

Faculty of Teacher Education, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang China

Publish Date: 2019-03-20

Abstract

Abstract

One hundred years ago, Hu Shi and others wanted to initiate China's new education reform with the help of Dewey. Dewey's visit to China brought forth the discourse of pragmatistic pedagogy penetrated into the context of China's education reform. The interest in Dewey's educational thought promoted the folk educational reform activities in China, which resulted in some significant events of educational reform and experiment. Dewey heat lasted in China for five or six years. After that, Dewey heat quickly subsided. On the occasion of Dewey's centennial visit to China, it can be seen that the rise and fall of Dewey heat has always been accompanied by the misunderstanding and misuse of Dewey's thought.
- Dewey,
- pragmatism,
- China's school of Dewey pedagogy,
- new education

FullText(HTML)

References(22)

References

[1]	蔡元培.(2006).对于新教育之意见.聂振斌选注.蔡元培文选.天津: 百花文艺出版社.
[2]	陈文彬.(2006).邀请美国教育家杜威访华的台前幕后.兰州学刊, (7), 56-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3492.2006.07.020
[3]	顾红亮.(2016-6-7).不善辞令, 让杜威曾经不大受欢迎.解放日报, 取自: http://www.sohu.com/a/81512211_115696
[4]	胡适.(2015).胡适谈教育.沈阳:辽宁人民出版社.
[5]	胡适.(2013).胡适文存(壹).北京:华文出版社.
[6]	姜琦.(1919).何谓新教育.新教育, 1(4), 358-360 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hdsfdxxb-jykxb200502010
[7]	经亨颐.(1984).经亨颐日记.杭州:浙江古籍出版社.
[8]	纪念李价民校长诞辰九十周年筹备组.(2002).硕德清芬: 纪念李价民校长诞辰九十周年.
[9]	孟禄.(1922).评新学制草案.教育杂志, (第14卷号外), 6-9.
[10]	钱穆.(2005).八十忆双亲师友杂忆.北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店.
[11]	璩鑫圭唐良炎.(1991).中国近代教育史资料汇编/学制演变.上海:上海教育出版社.
[12]	全国教育联合会新学制课程标准起草委员会.(1925).新学制课程标准纲要.上海:上海商务印书馆.
[13]	陶行知.(1984).陶行知全集(第一卷).长沙:湖南教育出版社.
[14]	吴研因.(1922).小学校和初级中校的课程草案.教育杂志, (第14卷号外), 1-28.
[15]	汪楚雄.(2010).启新与拓域中国新教育运动研究(1912-1930).济南:山东教育出版社.
[16]	威斯布鲁克.(2010).杜威与美国民主(王红欣译).北京: 北京大学出版社.
[17]	俞子夷.(1922).小学校的新课程.教育杂志, (第14卷号外), 1-24.
[18]	中国社会科学院近代史研究所中华民国史组编.(1979).胡适来往书信选(上册).北京: 中华书局.
[19]	中国社会科学院近代史研究所中华民国史组编.(1979).胡适的日记(上册).北京: 中华书局.
[20]	中国人民政治协商会议宁波市北仑区委员会文史资料委员会.(1990).北仑文史资料(第一辑).
[21]	周退密.(2015).退密文存.上海:上海辞书出版社.
[22]	庄俞.(1922).对于新学制小学教科目的意见.教育杂志, (第14卷号外), 1-6.