The Modernity of University Discipline and Its Transcendence

Cui Yanqiang; Quan Peipei

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.02.009

Volume 37 Issue 2

Mar. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences) > 2019 > 37(2): 73-80

Cui Yanqiang, Quan Peipei. The Modernity of University Discipline and Its Transcendence[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2019, 37(2): 73-80. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.02.009

Citation:

Cui Yanqiang, Quan Peipei. The Modernity of University Discipline and Its Transcendence[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2019, 37(2): 73-80. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.02.009

Citation:

PDF( 543 KB)

The Modernity of University Discipline and Its Transcendence

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.02.009

The Faculty of Education, Southwestern University, Chongqing 400715, China

Publish Date: 2019-03-20

Abstract

Abstract

Discipline, the basic component of human knowledge system, is the result of the continuous development of scientific knowledge and the deepening division of disciplines. With the advent of modernity, research universities, modern university systems, and discipline systems have been established. As a product of modernity, discipline has a variety of functions. Meanwhile, the development of disciplines is confronted with such realistic dilemmas as the stratification of organizational structure of disciplines, cataloguing of the discipline professional management, utilitarianism of production of disciplines knowledge, standardization of personnel training, the symbolization of disciplines and professional diplomas, and the quantification of discipline evaluation. Therefore, to achieve high-level governance and sustainable development of the discipline, it is urgent to adjust the organization system, break down the barriers, improve the management system, and optimize the evaluation system.
- discipline,
- modernity,
- knowledge production,
- discipline development

FullText(HTML)

References(17)

References

[1]	鲍德里亚(2015).符号政治经济学批判(夏莹译).南京: 南京大学出版社.
[2]	鲍嵘.(2002).学科制度的源起及走向初探.高等教育研究, (04), 102-106. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gdjyyj200204022
[3]	鲍嵘.(2004).美国学科专业分类系统的特点及其启示.比较教育研究, (4), 1－5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7667.2004.04.001
[4]	伯克.(2016).知识社会史(下卷): 从《百科全书》到维基百科(汪一帆等译).杭州: 浙江大学出版社.
[5]	崔延强, 吴叶林.(2015).现代性语境下高校学术量化评价的隐忧及超越论析.国家教育行政学院学报, (05), 15-20. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gjjyxzxyxb201505003
[6]	哈贝马斯.(2004).现代性的哲学话语(曹卫东等译).南京: 译林出版社.
[7]	胡钦晓.(2015).高校学术资本:特征、功用及其积累.教育研究, 36(01), 59-65. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xkjy201101013
[8]	华勒斯坦等.(1997).开放社会科学: 重建社会科学报告书(刘锋译).北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店.
[9]	华勒斯坦等.(1999).学科·知识·权力(刘建芝等编译).北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店.
[10]	伽达默尔.(1991).摧毁与解构(孙周兴译).哲学译丛, (05), 22-28.
[11]	克拉克.(1988).高等教育新论(王承绪译).杭州: 浙江教育出版社.
[12]	李醒民.(2012).知识的三大部类:自然科学、社会科学和人文学科.学术界, (08), 5-33+286. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1698.2012.08.001
[13]	齐美尔.(2000).金钱、性别、现代生活风格(刘小枫译).上海: 学林出版社.
[14]	钱志刚, 崔艳丽.(2012).知识生产视域中的学科制度危机与应对策略.中国高教研究, (10), 46-49. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zghgxyj201210011
[15]	沈文钦, 刘子瑜.(2011).层级管理与横向交叉:知识发展对学科目录管理的挑战.北京大学教育评论, 9(02), 25-37+188-189. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9468.2011.02.003
[16]	吴叶林.(2017).基于知识社会的我国学位制度变革研究.重庆:重庆出版社.
[17]	宣勇.(2002).基于学科的大学管理模式选择.中国高教研究, (4), 43-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3667.2002.04.017