The Focus and Trends of International Blended Learning Research: An Empirical Analysis Based on Mapping Knowledge Domain
-
摘要: 混合学习作为信息化教学改革进程中的一种重要的教与学形式，日益获得国际教育领域的广泛认可和高度关注。国际混合学习领域的热点问题和前沿趋势分析对我国混合学习领域研究具有重要的借鉴价值。本研究运用知识图谱的方法与技术实证分析新世纪以来国际混合学习领域的3454篇文献，结果显示，国际混合学习领域的研究热点聚焦学习者的学业成就、数学思维、本科生学习、基于情境的学习、自我反思等问题。卡雷斯·格雷厄姆、兰迪·加里森、柯蒂斯·邦克等学者的研究在该领域不同热点主题演进中颇具影响力。国际混合学习领域前沿发展趋势主要集中于混合学习技术环境开发研究、混合学习教学设计以及混合学习的应用实施三个方面。美国是对混合学习研究最为关注的国家，中国大陆和西班牙在混合学习领域的研究力量也较为集中。我国在混合学习研究中要注重学习者的自主学习能力、合作能力以及创新思维培养，打造课程、专业和院系有机结合的混合学习理论体系。Abstract: With the development of informatization in education, blended learning has become an important form of teaching and learning in higher education. Based on the visual analysis of 3, 454 papers from WOS (2000-2017) by Citespace software, this study explores the hot topics and frontier domains of international blended learning research in the new century through drawing the knowledge mapping. The results show that hot topics of international blended learning research focus on achievement, mathematical thinking, undergraduate student learning, scenario-based learning, and self-reflection. Environment development, instructional design as well as implementation and application have been regarded as the frontier topics. Other frontier domains include research on innovation in blended learning. Finally, countries and institutes which are focusing on blended learning research are analyzed.
-
Key words:
- blended learning /
- mapping knowledge domain /
- hot topics /
- frontier
-
表 1 国际混合学习领域研究突现关键词信息
序号 关键词 突变率 序号 关键词 突变率 1 Genetic algorithm 11.24 9 Internet 4.43 2 Neural networks 9.73 10 Teaching/learning strategy 4.30 3 Identification 9.60 11 Framework 3.61 4 Systems 6.14 12 Algorithm 3.56 5 Classification 5.60 13 Innovation 3.46 6 Network 5.32 14 Impact 3.34 7 Design 5.07 15 Information technology 3.15 8 Model 4.74 16 implementation 3.15 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 国际混合学习研究的主要国家(地区)
频次 国家(地区) 频次 国家(地区) 356 USA (美国) 87 AUSTRALIA(澳大利亚) 292 P.R.CHINA(中国) 85 GERMANY(德国) 168 SPAIN(西班牙) 73 CANADA(加拿大) 120 TAIWAN(中国台湾) 62 JAPAN(日本) 117 ENGLAND(英国) 58 MALAYSIA(马来西亚)
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 国际混合学习研究发文较为集中的机构
频次 机构 频次 机构 14 Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ(上海交通大学，中国大陆) 9 Univ Alcante(阿利坎特大学，西班牙) 13 Nanyang Technol Univ(南洋理工大学，新加坡) 8 Univ Salamanca (萨拉曼卡大学，西班牙) 11 Univ Granada (格拉纳达大学，西班牙) 8 Chaoyang Univ Technol (朝阳科技大学，中国台湾) 11 City Univ Hong Kong (香港城市大学，中国香港) 7 Univ Sao Paulo(圣保罗大学，巴西) 11 Univ Teknol Malaysia(马来西亚技术大学，马来西亚) 7 Univ Alberta(阿尔伯塔大学，加拿大)
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 蔡建东, 汪基德, 马婧. (2013).教育理论研究的量化与技术化路径——科学计量学方法与技术在教育理论研究中的应用.教育研究, (6), 17-23. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=jyyj201306002 [2] 陈仕吉.(2009).科学研究前沿探测方法综述.现代图书情报技术, (9), 28-33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3513.2009.09.005 [3] 杜占元.(2017).人工智能与未来教育变革.中国国情国力, (1), 6-8. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zggqgl201801002 [4] 国务院.(2017-01-19).国务院关于印发《国家教育事业发展"十三五"规划》的通知.2018-04-16.取自http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-01/19/content_5161341.htm. [5] 何克抗.(2014).如何实现信息技术与教育的"深度融合".课程·教材·教法, 34(2), 58-62. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=kcjcjf201402009 [6] 教育部.(2019-02-23).中共中央、国务院印发《中国教育现代化2035》.2019-04-06.取自: http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s6052/moe_838/201902/t20190223_370857.html. [7] 刘则渊, 王贤文, 陈超美. (2009)科学知识图谱方法及其在科技情报中的应用.数字图书馆论坛, (10), 14-32. doi: 10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2009.10.004 [8] 王元彬.(2006).混合式学习的设计与应用研究.济南: 山东师范大学硕士学位论文. [9] 姚计海. (2017).教育实证研究方法的范式问题与反思.华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), (3), 64-71. http://xbjk.ecnu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract9035.shtml [10] 余胜泉, 王阿习.(2016). "互联网+教育"的变革路径.中国电化教育, (10), 1-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9860.2016.10.001 [11] 詹泽慧, 李晓华.(2009).混合学习:定义、策略、现状与发展趋势——与美国印第安纳大学柯蒂斯·邦克教授的对话.中国电化教育, (12), 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9860.2009.12.001 [12] 祝智庭, 孟琦. (2003).远程教育中的混和学习.中国远程教育, (19), 30-34. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xdyjljy200904013 [13] Alonso, F., Lopez, G., & Manrique, D., et al. (2005). An instructional model for web-based e-learning education with a blended learning process approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 217-235. doi: 10.1111/bjet.2005.36.issue-2 [14] Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2006). The handbook of blended learning:Global perspectives, local Designs. San Francisco:Pfeiffer. [15] Chen, C. (2004). Searching for intellectual turning points:Progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 101(Suppl1), 5303-5310. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/OAPaper/oai_pubmedcentral.nih.gov_387312 [16] Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2015). Applying "First Principles of Instruction" in a blended learning course. Technology in Education. Transforming Educational Practices with Technology. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer. [17] Clow, D. (2013). An overview of learning analytics. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(6), 683-695. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2013.827653 [18] Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics:drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5/6), 304-317. doi: 10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051816 [19] Garrison, D.R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning:Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148. doi: 10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2 [20] Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H.(2004). Blended learning:Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. doi: 10.1016-j.iheduc.2004.02.001/ [21] Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education:Framework, principle and guidelines. San Francisco:Jossey -Bass. [22] Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In Bonk, C. J. & Graham, C. R.(eds.). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs, San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer, 3-21. [23] Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W. & Harrison, J.B.(2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4-14. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003 [24] Guan, C. Z., & Liu, Z. Y. (2013). An inquiry-based blended learning system for computer network curriculum. International Conference on Computer Science & Education. Colombo:Sri Lanka. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=a069fba5fe9d6c746273e38ac0dc5318&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [25] Johnson, R., B, & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research:A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 12-26. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033002012 [26] Johnson, L., Adams, Becker. S, & Cummins, M., et al. (2016). NMC Horizon Report:2016 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas:The New Media Consortium. [27] Josh, B. (2004). The Blended Learning Book: Best Practices, Proven Methodologies, and Lessons Learned. Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer Publishers. [28] Kerres, M., & De Witt, C. (2003). A didactical framework for the design of blended learning arrangements. Journal of Educational Media, 28, 101-113. doi: 10.1080/1358165032000165653 [29] Liu, Y., & Zhou, Z.(2009). A Theme-Based Blended E-learning System. In International Conference on Web Information Systems and Mining. IEEE Computer Society, 306-309. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=CC0210324280 [30] López-Pérez, M.V., López-Pérez, N.C., & Rodriguez-Ariza, L.(2011). Blended learning in higher education:Students' perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers in Education, 56, 818-826. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023 [31] Means, B., Toyama, Y., & Murphy, R., et al. (2009).Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning:A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=10.1097/CIN.0000000000000397 [32] Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2007). Technological pedagogical content knowledge(TPCK): Confronting the wicked problems of teaching with technology. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.). Proceedings of Society for Information Technolgy and Teacher Education International Conference 2007, 2214-2226. [33] Osguthorpe, B. R., & Graham, C.R. (2003). Blended Learning Environments:Definitions and Directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227-233. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/NSTLQK/NSTL_QKJJ0211738158/ [34] Ono, Y., Ishinara, M., & Yamashiro, M.(2015). Blended instruction utilizing mobile tools in english teaching at colleges of technology. Electrical Engineering in Japan, 192(2), 1-11. doi: 10.1002/eej.2015.192.issue-2 [35] Ozkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students' evaluation of e-learning system in the higher education context:An empirical investigation. Computer & Education, 53, 1285-1296. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131509001584 [36] Poter, W. W., Graham, C. R., & Bodily, R.G., et al. (2016). A qualitative analysis of institutional drivers and barriers to blended learning adoption in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.08.003 [37] UNESCO. (2012). Learning analytics. Policy Brief, 1-12. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ycyyzz201306003 [38] Wagner, E., & Ice, P. (2012). Data changes everything:Delivering on the promise of learning analytics in higher education. EDUCAUSE Review, 33-42. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=32b0a4d81538463c430e2a0e803615fc&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [39] Wang, F. L., Fong, J., & Choy, M., et al. (2007). Blended teaching and learning of computer programming. In Leung, H. et al. (Eds.). Advances in Web Based Learning. ICWL International Conference, Edinburgh, UK, 606-617. [40] Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R.D., & Hsia, T.L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computer & Education, 55, 155-164. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=6ec4375b184ff6d2456774ae33014626&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn -
点击查看大图
图(2) / 表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 255
- HTML全文浏览量: 497
- PDF下载量: 47
- 被引次数: 0