西方大学内部治理模式的嬗变：从学院式走向创业型

朱剑

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.01.008

西方大学内部治理模式的嬗变：从学院式走向创业型

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.01.008

朱剑

浙江师范大学田家炳教育科学研究院，浙江金华 321004

基金项目: 教育部哲学社会科学研究课题重大攻关项目“高校内部治理体系创新的理论与实践研究”（16JZD039）

计量
- 文章访问数: 814
- HTML全文浏览量: 672
- PDF下载量: 22
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 网络出版日期: 2019-12-27
- 刊出日期: 2020-01-01

The Evolution of Internal Governance Models for Western Universities: From Collegial Governance to Entrepreneurial Governance

Zhu Jian

The P.K. Tin Institute of Educational Science, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, Zhejiang China

摘要

摘要: 治理模式是大学内部治理的核心话题之一。在当前我国强调完善大学内部治理的背景下，本文较为系统地梳理了西方大学内部治理模式的嬗变过程。总体而言，西方大学内部治理模式先后出现了四种形态：学院式、层级式、管理型和创业型，它们从一定程度上折射出了大学发展的四种不同环境。这四种大学治理模式的出现时间虽然先后有别，但并非相互取代；相反，它们在一定时期之内能相互共存。西方大学内部治理模式的嬗变也凸显出大学内部治理模式改革的两大趋势：学术权力在一定程度上得到充分保障，行政权力的行使越发专业化。毋庸置疑，西方大学内部治理模式的改革之路仍在继续，“网络治理”模式在理论上被认为是可行路径之一，但在实践层面却有待进一步检验。西方大学治理模式的演变可为我国当前的高校治理改革提供些许思路。
- 西方大学 /
- 内部治理模式 /
- 嬗变
Abstract: The internal governance model (IGM) is one of the key issues for university governance. Against the background of emphasizing the improvement of internal university governance for contemporary Chinese universities, this paper systematically reviews the evolution of IGMs for western universities. Generally, there are four governance models that have emerged chronologically, and they are collegial governance, bureaucratic governance, managerial governance and entrepreneurial governance. The four IGMs have to some extent reflected on the four different kinds of context where western universities operate. The four chronological models have not been replaced by each other; rather, they have coexisted for a period of time. The evolution of IGMs for western universities has characterized the following two trends. Firstly, academic power has been ensured to some extent. Secondly, the execution of administrative power has been increasingly professional. Undoubtedly, the reform of IGMs for western universities is still ongoing. Network governance is therefore regarded as a possible solution to the weaknesses of the existing four IGMs theoretically; however, it deserves more practical examination. The evolution of IGMs for western universities could offer some solutions for the governance reform of China’s higher education institutions.
- Western universities /
- internal governance model /
- evolution

HTML全文

图 1 英国牛津大学现行的治理结构

资料来源：Oxford University (2018a和2018b)。

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 澳大利亚新南威尔士大学的组织结构（2017年9月）

资料来源：University of New South Wales Organization Chart(University of New South Wales, 2017c)。注：学术领导小组成员包括高级执行副校长、执行副校长（学术事务）、执行副校长（研究事务）、执行副校长（产业事务）和执行副校长（包容与多样化事务）。学院领导小组包括艺术与设计学院院长、人文与社会科学学院院长、建筑环境学院院长、商学院院长、工学院院长、法学院院长、医学院院长、理学院院长和堪培拉校区负责人。专业领导小组包括人力资源副校长、对外关系副校长、慈善事务副校长和财政与运行事务副校长。

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 荷兰特温特大学组织结构

资料来源：Organizational Structure, University of Twente(University of Twente, 2017c)。

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 学术权力与行政权力在四种不同大学治理模式下的博弈

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(48)

[1]	陈金圣. (2015). 从行政主导走向多元共治: 中国大学治理的转型路径. 教育发展研究,(11),40−48.
[2]	克尔. (1993). 大学的功用(陈学飞等译). 南昌: 江西教育出版社.
[3]	克拉克.(2008). 大学的持续变革——创业型大学新案例和新概念(王承绪译). 北京: 人民教育出版社.
[4]	曲铭峰, 龚放. (2011). 哈佛大学与当代高等教育——德里克·博克访谈录. 高等教育研究,(10),15−17.
[5]	韦伯.(2010).支配社会学.(康乐, 简惠美译). 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社.
[6]	谢笑珍. (2011). 科层制学术治理模式的功能障碍. 高校教育管理,6(5),12−15.
[7]	于文明, 卢伟. (2016). 治理理论的实用性及大学治理的中国实践方略. 高等教育研究,(10),25−30.
[8]	Anderson, F. L. (1963). The organizational character of American colleges and universities. In T, Lunsford, (ed). The Study of Academic Administration. Boulder, Colo.: Western Interstate commission for higher education.
[9]	Baldridge, J. V. (1971). Models of university governance: bureaucratic, collegial, and political. Research and Development Memorandum, 77, 1−19.
[10]	Ball. S. (2008). New philanthropy, new networks and new governance in education. Political Studies, 56(4), 747−765. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00722.x
[11]	Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2007). Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 477−493. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300167
[12]	Burnes, B., Wend, P. & By, T. R. (2014). The changing face of English universities: reinventing collegiality for the twenty-first century. Studies in Higher Education, 39(6), 905−926. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2012.754858
[13]	Clark, B. R. (1998a). The entrepreneurial university: demand and response. Tertiary Education and Management, 4(1), 5−16. doi: 10.1080/13583883.1998.9966941
[14]	Clark, B. R. (1998b). Creating entrepreneurial universities: organizational pathways of transformation. Guildford: IAU/Pergamon.
[15]	Dearlove, J. (2002). A continuing role for academics: the governance of UK universities in the post-dearing era. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(3), 257−275. doi: 10.1111/1468-2273.00217
[16]	De Boer, H., Enders, J., & Schimank, U. (2007). On the way towards new public management? The governance of university system in England, the Netherlands, Austria and Germany. In D. Jansen(ed.), New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations: Disciplinary Approaches, Interfaces and Integration(pp.137−152). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
[17]	De Boer H., & Goedegebuure, L. (2001). On limitations and consequences of change: Dutch university governance in transition. Tertiary Education and Management, 7, 163−180. doi: 10.1080/13583883.2001.9967049
[18]	Duke, C. (2002). Managing the Learning University. Buckingham: Open University Press.
[19]	Herderson, A. (1960). Policies and Practices in Higher Education. New York: Harper and Row.
[20]	Kwiek, M. (2016). Academic entrepreneurialism and changing governance in universities: Evidence form empirical studies. In J, Frost. F, Hattke., and Reihlen, M. (eds), Multi-Level Governance in Universities: Strategy, Structure, Control (pp. 49−74). Switzerland: Springer.
[21]	Lapworth, S. (2004). Arresting the decline in shared governance: towards a flexible model for academic participation. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(4), 299−314. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2004.00275.x
[22]	Macfralane, C. (2005). The disengaged academic: the retreat form citizenship. Higher Education Quarterly, 59(4), 296−312. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2005.00299.x
[23]	McNay, I. (1999). From the collegial academy to corporate enterprise: the changing culture of universities. In T. Schuller (ed.), The changing university? (pp.105-115). Buckingham: the Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
[24]	Middlehurst, R. (1993). Leading Academic. Buckingham: the Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
[25]	Mortimer, K., & Sathre, C. O. B. (2007). The Art and Politics of Academic Governance: Relations among Boards, Presidents and Faculty. Wesport: Praeger.
[26]	Musselin, C. (2005). Change or continuity in higher education governance? Lessons drawn from twenty years of national reform in European countries. In. I. Bleiklie and M. Henkel (eds.), Governing Knowledge: a Study of Continuity and Change in Higher Education, a Festschrift in Honour of Maurice Kogan (pp.65−79). Dordrecht: Springer.
[27]	Oxford University. (2017a). The Governance of Oxford University. (2017-09-13) Retrieved from https://www.ox.ac.uk/about/organization/governance?wssl=1.
[28]	Oxford University. (2017b). Statement of primary responsibilities of Council. (2017-09-13) Retrieved from http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/councilsec/governance/governancestructures/theuniversitysgovernancestructure/primary/.
[29]	Oxford University.(2018a). Simplified Views of University Relationship. (2018-11-19) Retrieved from https://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/media/global/wwwadminoxacuk/localsites/personnel/documents/deptadminproject/manual/Simplified_View_of_University_Relationships.pdf.
[30]	Oxford University.(2018b). A brief history and overview of the University’s governance arrangements. (2018-11-19) Retrieved from http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/councilsec/governance/governancestructures/theuniversitysgovernancestructure/gov_expl/.
[31]	Peters, M., Marshall, J., & Fitzsimons, P. (2000). Managerialism and education policy in a global context: Foucault, neoliberalism and the doctrine of self-management. In N. C. Burbules and C. A. Torres (eds.), Globalization and Education: Critical Perspectives (pp. 109−132). New York: Routledge.
[32]	Rowland, J. (2013). Academic board: less intellectual and more academic capital in higher education governance?. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1274−1289. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2011.619655
[33]	Rowlands, J. (2015a). Turning collegial governance on its head: symbolic violence, hegemony and the academic board. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(7), 1017−1035. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2014.883916
[34]	Rowlands, J. (2015b). Present but not counted: the tenuous position of academic board chairs within contemporary university governance. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 18(3), 263−278. doi: 10.1080/13603124.2014.925978
[35]	Rowlands, J. (2017). Academic Governance in the Contemporary University: perspectives from Anglophone nations. Singapore: Springer.
[36]	Salter, B., & Tapper, T (2002). The external pressures on the internal governance of universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(3), 245−256. doi: 10.1111/1468-2273.00216
[37]	Stroup, H. H. (1966). Bureaucracy in Higher Education. New York. Free Press.
[38]	Tapper, T. & Palfreyman, D. (2002). Understanding collegiality: the changing Oxbridge model. Tertiary Education and Management, 8(1), 47−63. doi: 10.1080/13583883.2002.9967068
[39]	Tapper, T., & Salter, B. (2002). Oxford, Cambridge and the Changing Idea of the University: the Challenge to Donnish Domination. Buckingham: the Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
[40]	Tolofari, S. (2005). New public management and higher education. Policy Futures in Education, 3(1), 75−89. doi: 10.2304/pfie.2005.3.1.11
[41]	Trakman, L. (2008). Modeling university governance. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(1/2), 63−83.
[42]	University of New South Wales. (2017a). The Council of UNSW (2017-09-21). Retrieved from https://www.unsw.edu.au/about-us/governance/unsw-council.
[43]	University of New South Wales. (2017b). The Academic board of UNSW (2017-09-21). Retrieved from https://www.unsw.edu.au/about-us/governance/academic-board.
[44]	University of New South Wales. (2017c). Organizational chart of UNSW (2017-09-21). Retrieved from https://www.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/documents/UNSW_org_chart-September_2017.pdf.
[45]	University of New South Wales. (2017d). Operational Governance Framework as of October 2016 of UNSW(2017-09-21). Retrieved from https://www.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/documents/OperationalGovernanceFrameworkasofOctober2016.pdf.
[46]	University of Twente. (2017a). Executive Board of University of Twente(2017-09-21). Retrieved from https://www.utwente.nl/en/organization/structure/management.
[47]	University of Twente. (2017b). Supervisory Board of University of Twente(2017-09-29). Retrieved from https://www.utwente.nl/en/organization/structure/management/supervisory-board/.
[48]	University of Twente. (2017c). Organizational Structure of University of Twente(2017-09-28). Retrieved from https://www.utwente.nl/download/organogram-organigram-ut-en.pdf.