中国人文社会科学核心期刊

中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊

中文核心期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

破解教育生产“黑箱”:教育生产函数研究的评述与展望

李波 黄斌

李波, 黄斌. 破解教育生产“黑箱”:教育生产函数研究的评述与展望[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(9): 137-161. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.09.008
引用本文: 李波, 黄斌. 破解教育生产“黑箱”:教育生产函数研究的评述与展望[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020, 38(9): 137-161. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.09.008
Li Bo, Huang Bin. Opening the Black Box of Educational Production: The Retrospect and Prospect of Educational Production Function[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(9): 137-161. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.09.008
Citation: Li Bo, Huang Bin. Opening the Black Box of Educational Production: The Retrospect and Prospect of Educational Production Function[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(9): 137-161. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.09.008

破解教育生产“黑箱”:教育生产函数研究的评述与展望

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.09.008
基金项目: 国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“县域义务教育学校教师校际交流补偿机制研究”(BFA190054)
  • ①相关领域中文权威期刊包括《教育与经济》《教育经济评论》《劳动经济研究》《教育研究》《教育发展研究》《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》《教育学报》《中国教育学刊》《教育科学》《北京大学教育评论》《复旦教育论坛》《社会学研究》《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》。相关领域英文权威期刊包括《教育经济学评论》(Economics of Education Review)、《教育经济学》(Education Economics)、《美国经济评论》(American Economic Review)、《计量经济学》(Econometrica)、《政治经济学杂志》(Journal of Political Economy)、《美国教育研究杂志》(American Educational Research Journal)、《英国教育研究杂志》(British Educational Research Journal)、《美国教育杂志》(American Journal of Education)、《澳大利亚教育杂志》(Australian Journal of Education)、《欧洲教育杂志》(European Journal of Education)、《国际教育发展期刊》(International Journal of Educational Development)、《教育心理学》(Educational Psychology)、《国际教育研究杂志》(International Journal of Educational Research)、《幼儿研究季刊》(Early Childhood Research Quarterly)、《学校效能与学校改善》(School Effectiveness and School Improvement)、《劳动经济学杂志》(Journal of Labor Economics)、《应用经济学》(Applied Economics)、《公共经济学杂志》(Journal of Public Economics)、《劳动经济学》(Labour Economics)。
  • ②12世纪犹太教有集体研修圣经人数不超过40人的教义。后续发展为中小学班额不得超过40人,同一学校入学人数超过40人会自动拆分到两个班级。

Opening the Black Box of Educational Production: The Retrospect and Prospect of Educational Production Function

  • 摘要: 教育生产活动具有关联性,教育产出受到家庭和学校等众多投入要素影响,且各投入要素间关系复杂。教育生产中的理论构建与现实观察常有鸿沟,实证研究方法和结论颇具争议,教育投入对教育产出的影响是教育经济学研究中长期未解的“黑箱”。教育生产函数完美地融合了经济学和教育学的理论和实证方法,通过探讨稀缺的教育资源配置和人类教育活动产出之间的关系,来破解教育生产“黑箱”。本文以教育生产函数实证研究为研究对象,通过介绍教育生产函数类型,并重点分析家庭投入型和学校投入型教育生产函数实证研究成果,归纳和反思近五年教育生产函数实证研究的基本趋势和存在的问题,并就未来教育生产函数实证研究提出展望。
    1)  ①相关领域中文权威期刊包括《教育与经济》《教育经济评论》《劳动经济研究》《教育研究》《教育发展研究》《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》《教育学报》《中国教育学刊》《教育科学》《北京大学教育评论》《复旦教育论坛》《社会学研究》《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》。相关领域英文权威期刊包括《教育经济学评论》(Economics of Education Review)、《教育经济学》(Education Economics)、《美国经济评论》(American Economic Review)、《计量经济学》(Econometrica)、《政治经济学杂志》(Journal of Political Economy)、《美国教育研究杂志》(American Educational Research Journal)、《英国教育研究杂志》(British Educational Research Journal)、《美国教育杂志》(American Journal of Education)、《澳大利亚教育杂志》(Australian Journal of Education)、《欧洲教育杂志》(European Journal of Education)、《国际教育发展期刊》(International Journal of Educational Development)、《教育心理学》(Educational Psychology)、《国际教育研究杂志》(International Journal of Educational Research)、《幼儿研究季刊》(Early Childhood Research Quarterly)、《学校效能与学校改善》(School Effectiveness and School Improvement)、《劳动经济学杂志》(Journal of Labor Economics)、《应用经济学》(Applied Economics)、《公共经济学杂志》(Journal of Public Economics)、《劳动经济学》(Labour Economics)。
    2)  ②12世纪犹太教有集体研修圣经人数不超过40人的教义。后续发展为中小学班额不得超过40人,同一学校入学人数超过40人会自动拆分到两个班级。
  • 图  1  2015—2019年教育生产函数实证研究趋势图

    图  2  2015—2019年教育生产函数英文论文主要发表国家

    表  1  数据结构、模型选择与一致性

    教育投入教育产出数据结构累积性模型一致性
    单期单期横截面较差单期型较差
    单期多期横截面一般增值型一般
    多期多期面板较好多期型较好
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  命题、判卷形式和固定效应选择

    命题主体判卷主体不同层面教育投入
    学校层面投入班级层面投入家庭层面投入
    区县统一命题区县统一判卷区县固定效应学校固定效应班级固定效应
    学校自主判卷×学校固定效应班级固定效应
    学校统一命题学校统一判卷×学校固定效应班级固定效应
    班级自主判卷××班级固定效应
    班级自主命题班级自主判卷××班级固定效应
      注:×为该数据不能满足研究需要
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 常芳, 党伊玮, 史耀疆, 刘承芳. (2018). “优绩优酬”: 关于西北农村教师绩效工资的实验研究. <italic>华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)</italic>, (4),131−141.
    [2] 陈彬莉, 白晓曦. (2015). 家庭社会经济地位、家长同辈群体压力与城镇小学生补习——基于北京市海淀区小学调查. <italic>清华大学教育研究</italic>, (5),102−109.
    [3] 陈纯槿, 郅庭瑾. (2017). 教育财政投入能否有效降低教育结果不平等——基于中国教育追踪调查数据的分析. <italic>教育研究</italic>,38(7),68−78.
    [4] 崔盛, 吴秋翔. (2019). 班级规模对初中生学业能力的异质性影响——基于中国教育追踪调查数据的实证研究. <italic>中国教育学刊</italic>, (3),28−35.
    [5] 丁延庆, 薛海平. (2009). 从效率视角对我国基础教育阶段公办学校分层的审视——基于对昆明市公办高中的教育生产函数研究. <italic>北京大学教育评论</italic>, (4),35−49. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1671-9468.2009.04.004
    [6] 段义德. (2018). 财政支出促进教育公平的作用机制分解及验证——基于CHIP 2013数据的分析. <italic>四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)</italic>, (4),94−102.
    [7] 郭筱琳, 周寰, 窦刚, 刘春晖, 罗良. (2017). 父母教育卷入与小学生学业成绩的关系——教育期望和学业自我效能感的共同调节作用. <italic>北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)</italic>, (2),45−53.
    [8] 胡咏梅, 杜育红. (2008). 中国西部农村初级中学教育生产函数的实证研究. <italic>教育与经济</italic>, (3),1−7. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1003-4870.2008.03.001
    [9] 胡咏梅, 杜育红. (2009). 中国西部农村小学教育生产函数的实证研究. <italic>教育研究</italic>, (7),58−67.
    [10] 胡咏梅, 范文凤, 丁维莉. (2015). 影子教育是否扩大教育结果的不均等——基于PISA 2012上海数据的经验研究. <italic>北京大学教育评论</italic>, (3),29−46. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1671-9468.2015.03.003
    [11] 胡咏梅, 卢珂. (2010). 教育资源投入对学生学业成绩的影响力评价——基于西部地区基础教育发展项目的研究. <italic>教育学报</italic>, (6),67−76. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1673-1298.2010.06.009
    [12] 雷万鹏. (2005). 高中生教育补习支出: 影响因素及政策启示. <italic>教育与经济</italic>, (1),39−42. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1003-4870.2005.01.010
    [13] 李波. (2018a). 父母参与对子女发展的影响——基于学业成绩和非认知能力的视角. <italic>教育与经济</italic>, (3),54−64.
    [14] 李波. (2018b). 教育补习真的有效吗?——基于学业表现和非认知发展的视角. <italic>北京社会科学</italic>, (6),38−47.
    [15] 李佳丽, 胡咏梅. (2017). 谁从影子教育中获益?——兼论影子教育对教育结果均等化的影响. <italic>教育与经济</italic>, (2),51−61. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1003-4870.2017.02.007
    [16] 李佳丽, 胡咏梅, 范文凤. (2016). 家庭背景、影子教育和学生学业成绩——基于Wisconsin模型的经验研究. <italic>教育经济评论</italic>, (1),70−89.
    [17] 李佳丽. (2017). 家长参与和代际闭合对初中生认知能力的影响——基于科尔曼社会资本理论的分析. <italic>教育发展研究</italic>, (2),6−14.
    [18] 李祥云, 魏萍. (2014). 学校资源配置对学生成绩的影响机制研究——基于对JX县小学问卷调查的实证分析. <italic>教师教育学报</italic>, (5),63−72.
    [19] 李祥云, 张建顺. (2018). 公共教育投入对学校教育结果的影响——基于湖北省70所小学数据的实证研究. <italic>中南财经政法大学学报</italic>, (6),81−88. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1003-5230.2018.06.009
    [20] 李忠路. (2016). 家庭背景、学业表现与研究生教育机会获得. <italic>社会</italic>, (3),86−109.
    [21] 李忠路, 邱泽奇. (2016). 家庭背景如何影响儿童学业成就?——义务教育阶段家庭社会经济地位影响差异分析. <italic>社会学研究</italic>, (4),121−144.
    [22] 梁文艳, 杜育红. (2011). 基于学生学业成绩的教师质量评价——来自中国西部农村小学的证据. <italic>北京大学教育评论</italic>, (3),105−120. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1671-9468.2011.03.009
    [23] 刘腾尧, 王晴. (2018). 课外辅导与学生成绩——基于CEPS的研究. <italic>教育经济评论</italic>, (5),70−94.
    [24] 马晓强, 彭文蓉, 萨丽·托马斯. (2006). 学校效能的增值评价——对河北省保定市普通高中学校的实证研究. <italic>教育研究</italic>, (10),77−84.
    [25] 庞晓鹏, 严如贺, 聂景春, 罗斯高, 张林秀, 史耀疆, 庞小冬. (2017). 农村小学生可以通过课外补习提高学习成绩吗?. <italic>教育经济评论</italic>, (2),87−101.
    [26] 史耀波, 赵欣欣. (2016). 父母外出务工与寄宿制: 哪个对农村学生辍学影响更大?——基于西部三省1881名初中生的实证分析. <italic>教育与经济</italic>, (5),78−83.
    [27] 孙志军, 刘泽云, 孙百才. (2009). 家庭、学校与儿童的学习成绩——基于甘肃省农村地区的研究. <italic>北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)</italic>, (5),103−115.
    [28] 孙志军. (2014). 基于双胞胎数据的教育收益率估计. <italic>经济学(季刊)</italic>, (3),1001−1020.
    [29] 唐俊超. (2015). 输在起跑线——再议中国社会的教育不平等(1978-2008). <italic>社会学研究</italic>, (3),123−145.
    [30] 唐一鹏. (2014). 从上海PISA 2012透视学生能力分位的影响因素. <italic>上海教育科研</italic>, (6),15−19. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1007-2020.2014.06.004
    [31] 田丹. (2017). 从高中到大学: 家庭背景对学业成就的影响研究. <italic>华中师范大学研究生学报</italic>, (4),15−19.
    [32] 王骏, 彭顺绪, 原莹. (2017). 重点高中、学校投入与学生学业成绩——基于J市普通高中的一个经验研究. <italic>世界经济文汇</italic>, (3),17−45.
    [33] 王骏, 孙志军. (2015). 重点高中能否提高学生的学业成绩——基于F县普通高中的一个断点回归设计研究. <italic>北京大学教育评论</italic>, (4),82−109. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1671-9468.2015.04.008
    [34] 王甫勤, 时怡雯. (2014). 家庭背景、教育期望与大学教育获得——基于上海市调查数据的实证研究. <italic>社会</italic>, (1),175−195.
    [35] 王善迈. (2008). 基础教育“重点校”政策分析. <italic>教育研究</italic>, (3),64−66.
    [36] 魏易. (2020). 校内还是校外: 中国基础教育阶段家庭教育支出现状研究. <italic>华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)</italic>, (5),103−116.
    [37] 谢桂华, 张阳阳. (2018). 点石成金的学校?——对学校“加工能力”的探讨. <italic>社会学研究</italic>, (3),141−165.
    [38] 薛海平, 丁小浩. (2009). 中国城镇学生教育补习研究. <italic>教育研究</italic>, (1),39−46.
    [39] 薛海平, 闵维方. (2008). 中国西部教育生产函数研究. <italic>教育与经济</italic>, (2),18−25. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1003-4870.2008.02.005
    [40] 薛海平, 王东, 巫锡炜. (2014). 课外补习对义务教育留守儿童学业成绩的影响研究. <italic>北京大学教育评论</italic>, (3),50−62. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1671-9468.2014.03.004
    [41] 薛海平, 王蓉. (2016). 教师绩效奖金对学生成绩影响研究. <italic>中国教育学刊</italic>, (5),34−38.
    [42] 薛海平. (2015). 从学校教育到影子教育: 教育竞争与社会再生产. <italic>北京大学教育评论</italic>, (3),47−69. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1671-9468.2015.03.004
    [43] 薛海平. (2018). 家庭资本与教育获得: 基于影子教育中介效应分析. <italic>教育与经济</italic>, (4),69−78. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1003-4870.2018.04.009
    [44] 杨东平. (2005). 高中阶段的社会分层和教育机会获得. <italic>清华大学教育研究</italic>, (3),52−59. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1001-4519.2005.03.009
    [45] 袁诚, 张磊, 曾颖. (2013). 地方教育投入对城镇家庭教育支出行为的影响——对我国城镇家庭动态重复截面数据的一个估计. <italic>经济学动态</italic>, (3),29−35.
    [46] 袁玉芝. (2016). 教育中的同伴效应分析——基于上海2012年PISA数据. <italic>上海教育科研</italic>, (3),30−34.
    [47] 曾满超, 丁小浩, 沈华. (2010). 初中生课外补习城乡差异分析——基于甘肃、湖南和江苏3省的初中学生课外补习调查. <italic>教育与经济</italic>, (2),7−11. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1003-4870.2010.02.002
    [48] 张雪, 张磊. (2017). 课外教育支出与学生的教育成果——基于CFPS微观数据的实证研究. <italic>经济科学</italic>, (4),94−108.
    [49] 张羽, 陈东, 刘娟娟. (2015). 小学课外补习对初中学业成绩的影响——基于北京市某初中九年追踪数据的实证研究. <italic>教育发展研究</italic>, (2),18−25.
    [50] 赵延东, 洪岩璧. (2012). 社会资本与教育获得——网络资源与社会闭合的视角. <italic>社会学研究</italic>, (5),47−69.
    [51] 郑琦, 杨钋. (2018). 班级规模与学生学业成绩——基于2015年PISA数据的研究. <italic>北京大学教育评论</italic>, (4),105−127.
    [52] Abdulkadiroğlu, A., Angrist, J. D., Dynarski, S. M., Kane, T. J., & Pathak, P. A. (2011). Accountability and flexibility in public schools: Evidence from Boston’s charters and pilots. <italic>The Quarterly Journal of Economics</italic>, 126(2), 699−748. doi:  10.1093/qje/qjr017
    [53] Anderson, K. J. & Minke, K. M. (2007). Parent involvement in education: Toward an understanding of parents' decision making. <italic>The Journal of Educational Research</italic>, 100(5), 311−323. doi:  10.3200/JOER.100.5.311-323
    [54] Angrist, J. D., & Lavy, V. (1999). Using Maimonides' rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement. <italic>The Quarterly Journal of Economics</italic>, 114(2), 533−575. doi:  10.1162/003355399556061
    [55] Antonovics, K. L., & Goldberger, A. S. (2005). Does increasing women’s schooling raise the schooling of the next generation? Comment. <italic>American Economic Review</italic>, 95(5), 1738−1744. doi:  10.1257/000282805775014353
    [56] Balch, R., & Springer, M. G. (2015). Performance pay, test scores, and student learning objectives. <italic>Economics of Education Review</italic>, 44(2), 114−125.
    [57] Behrman, J. R., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (2002). Does increasing women's schooling raise the schooling of the next generation?. <italic>American Economic Review</italic>, 92(1), 323−334. doi:  10.1257/000282802760015757
    [58] Belley, P., & Lochner, L. (2007). The changing role of family income and ability in determining educational achievement. <italic>Journal of Human Capital</italic>, 1(1), 37−89. doi:  10.1086/524674
    [59] Bingley, P., Christensen, K., & Jensen, V. M. (2009). Parental schooling and child development: Learning from twin parents. Danish National Centre for Social Research Social Policy and Welfare Services Working Paper 07: 2009.
    [60] Björklund, A., Lindahl, M., & Plug, E. (2006). The origins of intergenerational associations: Lessons from Swedish adoption data. <italic>The Quarterly Journal of Economics</italic>, 121(3), 999−1028. doi:  10.1162/qjec.121.3.999
    [61] Black, S. E., Devereux, P. J., & Salvanes, K. G. (2008). Staying in the classroom and out of the maternity ward? The effect of compulsory schooling laws on teenage births. <italic>The Economic Journal</italic>, 118(530), 1025−1054. doi:  10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02159.x
    [62] Boonk, L., Gijselaers, H., Ritzen. H, et al. (2018). A review of the relationship between parental involvement indicators and academic achievement. <italic>Educational Research Review</italic>, (24), 10−30.
    [63] Bray, M., Zhan, S., Lykins, C., Wang, D., & Kwo, O. (2014). Differentiated demand for private supplementary tutoring: Patterns and implications in Hong Kong secondary education. <italic>Economics of Education Review</italic>, 38(1), 24−37.
    [64] Briggs, D. C. (2001). The effect of admissions test preparation: Evidence from NELS: 88. <italic>Chance</italic>, 14(1), 10−18. doi:  10.1080/09332480.2001.10542245
    [65] Britton, J., & Propper, C. (2016). Teacher pay and school productivity: Exploiting wage regulation. <italic>Journal of Public Economics</italic>, 133, 75−89. doi:  10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.12.004
    [66] Britton, J., & Vignoles, A. (2017). Education production functions. In Johnes, G., Johnes, J., Agasisti, T., & López-Torres, L. (Eds.). Handbook of contemporary education economics(pp. 246−271). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    [67] Carneiro, P., Meghir, C., & Parey, M. (2013). Maternal education, home environments, and the development of children and adolescents. <italic>Journal of the European Economic Association</italic>, 11(1), 123−160.
    [68] Cheo, R., & Quah, E. (2005). Mothers, maids and tutors: An empirical evaluation of their effect on children's academic grades in Singapore. <italic>Education Economics</italic>, 13(3), 269−285. doi:  10.1080/09645290500073746
    [69] Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., Hilger, N., Saez, E., Schanzenbach, D. W., & Yagan, D. (2011). How does your kindergarten classroom affect your earnings? Evidence from Project STAR. <italic>The Quarterly Journal of Economics</italic>, 126(4), 1593−1660. doi:  10.1093/qje/qjr041
    [70] Choi, J. (2012). Unequal access to shadow education and its impacts on academic outcomes: Evidence from Korea. <italic>In Spring 2012 meeting of ISA RC</italic>, 28, 10−13.
    [71] Clark, D. (2010). Selective schools and academic achievement. <italic>The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy</italic>, 10(1), 1−40.
    [72] Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. <italic>Economics of Education Review</italic>, 26(6), 673−682. doi:  10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.10.002
    [73] Cohn, E., & Geske, T. G. (1990). The Economics of Education (3rd Edition). Oxford: Pergamon
    [74] Coleman, J. S., E. Campbell, C. Hobson, J. McPartland, A. Mood, F. Weinfeld & R. York (1966). Equality of education opportunity. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Studies.
    [75] Cullen, J. B., Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. (2006). The effect of school choice on participants: Evidence from randomized lotteries. <italic>Econometrica</italic>, 74(5), 1191−1230. doi:  10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00702.x
    [76] Cullen, J. B., Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. D. (2005). The impact of school choice on student outcomes: An analysis of the Chicago Public Schools. <italic>Journal of Public Economics</italic>, 89(5−6), 729−760. doi:  10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.001
    [77] Dahl, G. B., & Lochner, L. (2012). The impact of family income on child achievement: Evidence from the earned income tax credit. <italic>American Economic Review</italic>, 102(5), 1927−1956. doi:  10.1257/aer.102.5.1927
    [78] Dang, H. A. (2007). The determinants and impact of private tutoring classes in Vietnam. <italic>Economics of Education Review</italic>, 26(6), 683−698.
    [79] Dearden, L., Ferri, J., & Meghir, C. (2002). The effect of school quality on educational attainment and wages. <italic>Review of Economics and Statistics</italic>, 84(1), 1−20. doi:  10.1162/003465302317331883
    [80] Dearden, L., Machin, S., & Reed, H. (1997). Intergenerational mobility in Britain. <italic>The Economic Journal</italic>, 107(440), 47−66. doi:  10.1111/1468-0297.00141
    [81] Dee, T., & Lan, X. (2015). The achievement and course−taking effects of magnet schools: Regression−discontinuity evidence from urban China. <italic>Economics of Education Review</italic>, 47, 128−142. doi:  10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.05.007
    [82] Dobbie, W., & Fryer Jr, R. G. (2011). Are high−quality schools enough to increase achievement among the poor? Evidence from the Harlem Children's Zone. <italic>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</italic>, 3(3), 158−187. doi:  10.1257/app.3.3.158
    [83] Duncan, G. J., Yeung, W. J., Brooks−Gunn, J. & Smith, J. R. (1998). How much does childhood poverty affect the life chances of children?. <italic>American Sociological Review</italic>, 63(3), 406−423. doi:  10.2307/2657556
    [84] Epstein, J. L. (1990). School and family connections: Theory, research, and implications for integrating sociologies of education and family. <italic>Marriage & Family Review</italic>, 15(1-2), 99−126.
    [85] Ermisch, J. & Francesconi, M. (2001). Family matters: Impacts of family background on educational attainments. <italic>Economica</italic>, 68(270), 137−156. doi:  10.1111/1468-0335.00239
    [86] Finn, J. D. (1998). Parental engagement that makes a difference. <italic>Educational Leadership</italic>, 55(8), 20−24.
    [87] Fredriksson, P., Öckert, B., & Oosterbeek, H. (2016). Parental responses to public investments in children: Evidence from a maximum class size rule. <italic>Journal of Human Resources</italic>, 51(4), 832−868. doi:  10.3368/jhr.51.4.1114-6779R1
    [88] Fryer Jr, R. G., Levitt, S. D., List, J., & Sadoff, S. (2012). Enhancing the efficacy of teacher incentives through loss aversion: A field experiment. NBER Working Paper No. 18237.
    [89] Fryer, R. G. (2013). Teacher incentives and student achievement: Evidence from New York City public schools. <italic>Journal of Labor Economics</italic>, 31(2), 373−407. doi:  10.1086/667757
    [90] Glass, G. V. & Smith, M. L. (1979). Meta−analysis of research on class size and achievement. <italic>Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis</italic>, 1(1), 2−16. doi:  10.3102/01623737001001002
    [91] Glewwe, P. W., Hanushek, E. A., Humpage, S. D., & Ravina, R. (2011). School resources and educational outcomes in developing countries: A review of the literature from 1990 to 2010. National Bureau of Economic Research, 4−13.
    [92] Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (1997). Why don't schools and teachers seem to matter? Assessing the impact of unobservables on educational productivity. <italic>Journal of Human Resources</italic>, 32(3), 505−523. doi:  10.2307/146181
    [93] Goodman, S. F., & Turner, L. J. (2013). The design of teacher incentive pay and educational outcomes: Evidence from the New York City bonus program. <italic>Journal of Labor Economics</italic>, 31(2), 409−420. doi:  10.1086/668676
    [94] Gracia, P. & Ghysels, J. (2017). Educational inequalities in parental care time: Cross−national evidence from Belgium, Denmark, Spain, and the United Kingdom. <italic>Social Science Research</italic>, 63, 166−180. doi:  10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.09.016
    [95] Guryan, J., Hurse, E. & Kearney, M. (2008). Parental education and parental time with children. <italic>Journal of Economic Perspectives</italic>, 22(3), 23−46. doi:  10.1257/jep.22.3.23
    [96] Haegeland, T., Kirkebøen, L. J., Raaum, O., & Salvanes, K. G. (2010). Why children of college graduates outperform their schoolmates: A study of cousins and adoptees. Institute for the Study of Labor Discussion Paper 5369.
    [97] Hanushek, E. A. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. <italic>Educational Researcher</italic>, 18(4), 45−62. doi:  10.3102/0013189X018004045
    [98] Hanushek, E. A. (1996). School resources and student performance. In Burtless, G. (Ed.). Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution Press, 43−73.
    [99] Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. <italic>Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis</italic>, 19(2), 141−164. doi:  10.3102/01623737019002141
    [100] Hanushek, E. A. (2003). The failure of input−based schooling policies. <italic>The Economic Journal</italic>, 113(485), 64−98. doi:  10.1111/1468-0297.00099
    [101] Haveman, R., & Wolfe, B. (1995). The determinants of children's attainments: A review of methods and findings. <italic>Journal of Economic Literature</italic>, 33(4), 1829−1878.
    [102] Heckman, J., Pinto, R., & Savelyev, P. (2013). Understanding the mechanisms through which an influential early childhood program boosted adult outcomes. <italic>American Economic Review</italic>, 103(6), 2052−2086. doi:  10.1257/aer.103.6.2052
    [103] Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., & Greenwald, R. (1994). An exchange: Part I: Does money matter? A meta−analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. <italic>Educational Researcher</italic>, 23(3), 5−14. doi:  10.3102/0013189X023003005
    [104] Heymann, S. J. & Earle, A. (2000). Low−income parents: How do working conditions affect their opportunity to help children at risk?. <italic>American Educational Research Journal</italic>, 37(4), 833−848. doi:  10.3102/00028312037004833
    [105] Holmlund, H., Lindahl, M., & Plug, E. (2011). The causal effect of parents' schooling on children's schooling: A comparison of estimation methods. <italic>Journal of Economic Literature</italic>, 49(3), 615−651. doi:  10.1257/jel.49.3.615
    [106] Holmlund, H., McNally, S., & Viarengo, M. (2010). Does money matter for schools?. <italic>Economics of Education Review</italic>, 29(6), 1154−1164. doi:  10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.008
    [107] Hoxby, C. M. (2000). The effects of class size on student achievement: New evidence from population variation. <italic>The Quarterly Journal of Economics</italic>, 115(4), 1239−1285. doi:  10.1162/003355300555060
    [108] Humlum, M. K. (2011). Timing of family income, borrowing constraints, and child achievement. <italic>Journal of Population Economics</italic>, 24, 979−1004. doi:  10.1007/s00148-010-0309-9
    [109] Kane, T. J., Rockoff, J. E., & Staiger, D. O. (2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. <italic>Economics of Education Review</italic>, 27(6), 615−631. doi:  10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.05.005
    [110] Kang, C. (2007). Does money matter? The effect of private educational expenditures on academic performance. National University of Singapore. Department of Economics Working Paper No. 0704.
    [111] Kim, J. H., & Park, D. (2010). The determinants of demand for private tutoring in South Korea. <italic>Asia Pacific Education Review</italic>, 11(3), 411−421. doi:  10.1007/s12564-009-9067-3
    [112] Krueger, A. B. (1998). Reassessing the view that American schools are broken. <italic>Economic Policy Review</italic>, 4(1), 29−46.
    [113] Lareau, A. (1987). Social class differences in family−school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. <italic>Sociology of Education</italic>, 60(2), 73−85. doi:  10.2307/2112583
    [114] Lavy, V. (2009). Performance pay and teachers' effort, productivity, and grading ethics. <italic>American Economic Review</italic>, 99(5), 1979−2011. doi:  10.1257/aer.99.5.1979
    [115] Lee, J. T., Kim, Y. B., & Yoon, C. H. (2004). The effects of pre−class tutoring on student achievement: Challenges and implications for public education in Korea. <italic>KEDI Journal of Educational Policy</italic>, 1(1), 25−42.
    [116] Leuven, E., Oosterbeek, H., & Rønning, M. (2008). Quasi−experimental estimates of the effect of class size on achievement in Norway. <italic>Scandinavian Journal of Economics</italic>, 110(4), 663−693. doi:  10.1111/j.1467-9442.2008.00556.x
    [117] Liu, J. (2012). Does cram schooling matter? Who goes to cram schools? Evidence from Taiwan. <italic>International Journal of Educational Development</italic>, 32(1), 46−52. doi:  10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.01.014
    [118] McNeal, Jr. & Ralph, B. (2012). Checking in or checking out? Investigating the parent involvement reactive hypothesis. <italic>Journal of Educational Research</italic>, 105(2), 79−89.
    [119] Morgan, S. L. & Todd,J.J. (2009). Intergenerational closure and academic achievement in high school: A new evaluation of Coleman's Conjecture. <italic>Sociology of Education</italic>, 82(3), 267−285. doi:  10.1177/003804070908200304
    [120] Neal, D. (2011). The design of performance pay in education. In Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J., Kautz, T., Hanushek, E. A., Machin, S., & Woessmann, L. Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 4, pp. 495−550). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [121] Ono, H. (2007). Does examination hell pay off? A cost–benefit analysis of “ronin” and college education in Japan. <italic>Economics of Education Review</italic>, 26(3), 271−284. doi:  10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.01.002
    [122] Oreopoulos, P. (2006). Estimating average and local average treatment effects of education when compulsory schooling laws really matter. <italic>American Economic Review</italic>, 96(1), 152−175. doi:  10.1257/000282806776157641
    [123] Oreopoulos, P., Page, M. E., & Stevens, A. H. (2006). The intergenerational effects of compulsory schooling. <italic>Journal of Labor Economics</italic>, 24(4), 729−760. doi:  10.1086/506484
    [124] Park, S. & Holloway, S. D. (2017). The effects of school−based parental involvement on academic achievement at the child and elementary school level: A longitudinal study. <italic>Journal of Educational Research</italic>, 110(1), 1−16.
    [125] Patall, E. A., Copper, H. & Robinson, J. C. (2008). Parent involvement in homework: A research synthesis. <italic>Review of Educational Research</italic>, 78(4), 1039−1101. doi:  10.3102/0034654308325185
    [126] Perna, L. W. & Titus, M. A. (2005). The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrollment: An examination of racial/ethnic group differences. <italic>Journal of Higher Education</italic>, 76(5), 485−518. doi:  10.1353/jhe.2005.0036
    [127] Plug, E. (2004). Estimating the effect of mother's schooling on children’s schooling using a sample of adoptees. <italic>American Economic Review</italic>, 94(1), 358−368. doi:  10.1257/000282804322970850
    [128] Pop−Eleches, C., & Urquiola, M. (2013). Going to a better school: Effects and behavioral responses. <italic>American Economic Review</italic>, 103(4), 1289−1324. doi:  10.1257/aer.103.4.1289
    [129] Powell, B., & Steelman, L. C. (1995). Feeling the pinch: Child spacing and constraints on parental economic investments in children. <italic>Social Forces</italic>, 73(4), 1465−1486. doi:  10.2307/2580455
    [130] Ram, R. (2004). School expenditures and student achievement: Evidence for the United States. <italic>Education Economics</italic>, 12(2), 169−176. doi:  10.1080/0964529042000239177
    [131] Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. <italic>Econometrica</italic>, 73(2), 417−458. doi:  10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x
    [132] Rockoff, J. (2009). Field experiments in class size from the early twentieth century. <italic>Journal of Economic Perspectives</italic>, 23(4), 211−230. doi:  10.1257/jep.23.4.211
    [133] Rothstein, J. (2010). Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement. <italic>Quarterly Journal of Economics</italic>, 125(1), 175−214. doi:  10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.175
    [134] Roy, J. (2011). Impact of school finance reform on resource equalization and academic performance: Evidence from Michigan. <italic>Education Finance and Policy</italic>, 6(2), 137−167. doi:  10.1162/EDFP_a_00030
    [135] Sacerdote, B. (2002). The nature and nurture of economic outcomes. <italic>American Economic Review</italic>, 92(2), 344−348. doi:  10.1257/000282802320191589
    [136] Sacerdote, B. (2007). How large are the effects from changes in family environment? A study of Korean American adoptees. <italic>The Quarterly Journal of Economics</italic>, 122(1), 119−157. doi:  10.1162/qjec.122.1.119
    [137] Schanzenbach, D. W. (2006). What have researchers learned from Project STAR?. <italic>Brookings Papers on Education Policy</italic>, (9), 205−228.
    [138] Schanzenbach, D. W. (2014). Does Class Size Matter? Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/does-class-size-matter.
    [139] Sebastian, J., Moon, J. M. & Cunningham, M. (2016). The relationship of school−based parental involvement with student achievement: A comparison of principal and parent survey reports from PISA 2012. <italic>Educational Studies</italic>, 43(2), 123−146.
    [140] Singh, K., Bickley, P. G., Trivette P., et al. (1995). The effects of four components of parental involvement on eighth−grade student achievement: Structural analysis of NELS−88 data. <italic>School Psychology Review</italic>, 24(2), 299−317.
    [141] Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P. (1992). Shadow education and allocation in formal schooling: Transition to university in Japan. <italic>American Journal of Sociology</italic>, 97(6), 1639−1657. doi:  10.1086/229942
    [142] Sui−Chu, E. H., & Willms, J. D. (1996). Effects of parental involvement on eighth−grade achievement. <italic>Sociology of Education</italic>, 69(2), 126−141. doi:  10.2307/2112802
    [143] Tansel, A., & Bircan, F. (2006). Demand for education in Turkey: A tobit analysis of private tutoring expenditures. <italic>Economics of Education Review</italic>, 25(3), 303−313. doi:  10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.02.003
    [144] Todd, P. E., & Wolpin, K. I. (2007). The production of cognitive achievement in children: Home, school, and racial test score gaps. <italic>Journal of Human Capital</italic>, 1(1), 91−136. doi:  10.1086/526401
    [145] Wilder, S. (2014). Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: A meta−synthesis. <italic>Educational Review</italic>, 66(3), 377−397. doi:  10.1080/00131911.2013.780009
    [146] Woessmann, L. (2011). Cross−country evidence on teacher performance pay. <italic>Economics of Education Review</italic>, 30(3), 404−418. doi:  10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.12.008
    [147] Woessmann, L., & West, M. (2006). Class−size effects in school systems around the world: Evidence from between−grade variation in TIMSS. <italic>European Economic Review</italic>, 50(3), 695−736. doi:  10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.11.005
    [148] Xu, M., Benson, K., Mudrey, R., et al. (2010). The relationship between parental involvement, self−regulated learning, and reading achievement of fifth graders: A path analysis using the ECLS−K database. <italic>Social Psychology of Education an International Journal</italic>, 13(2), 237−269. doi:  10.1007/s11218-009-9104-4
    [149] Yan, W. & Lin, Q. (2005). Parent involvement and mathematics achievement: Contrast across racial and ethnic groups. <italic>Journal of Educational Research</italic>, 99(2), 116−127. doi:  10.3200/JOER.99.2.116
    [150] Zedan, R. F. (2012). Parent involvement according to education level, socio−economic situation, and number of family members. <italic>Journal of Educational Enquiry</italic>, (1), 13−28.
    [151] Zhang, Y. (2013). Does private tutoring improve students’ national college entrance exam performance? A case study from Jinan, China. <italic>Economics of Education Review</italic>, 32(1), 1−28.
    [152] Zhao, S. B. (2018). Changes in parental time with children in china: 2004-2011. <italic>Journal of Family History</italic>, 43(2), 204−222. doi:  10.1177/0363199017746449
  • 加载中
图(2) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  670
  • HTML全文浏览量:  629
  • PDF下载量:  82
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-09-14
  • 刊出日期:  2020-09-14

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回