技术的默会知识及其实践培育

徐金雷

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.06.002

技术的默会知识及其实践培育

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.06.002

徐金雷

南京师范大学教育科学学院, 南京 210097

基金项目:

江苏省社会科学基金一般项目"默会知识观视角下中小学技术学科核心素养培养策略研究" 18JWB008

江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目 PAPD

计量
- 文章访问数: 208
- HTML全文浏览量: 192
- PDF下载量: 220
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 刊出日期: 2018-11-20

The Tacit Dimension of Technology Knowledge and its Pragmatic Knowing

XU Jinlei

Development Planning Office, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China

摘要

摘要: 默会知识观丰富了实践导向的厚实认识论的思想源泉，揭示出技术认知中默会维度的重要性，促进了对技术认知过程中默会知识的本质及其形态的更深刻理解。从默会知识观的视角发掘技术知识的特点，分析技术默会知识的具身性、亲知和动态觉知等认知特征，可为技术默会认知及其实践培育提供思路与策略："情境+实践"是技术默会认知的应然场域，"感觉+经验"是技术默会认知的亲知途径，"实例+整体性"是技术默会认知的模式识别，"示范+练习"是技术默会认知的优先策略。
- 技术知识 /
- 技术默会知识 /
- 技术认识论 /
- 认知特性 /
- 实践培育
Abstract: This paper explores the knowledge essence of technology from the perspective of thick epistemology and analyzes the importance of revealing the technology knowledge characteristics from the tacit dimension. Perspective of tacit epistemology, together with the characteristics of technology knowledge itself, can provide strategies and methods for the tacit knowing of technology and its pragmatic knowing through the analysis of the technology tacit knowledge's cognitive characteristics of embodiment, knowledge by acquaintance and dynamic awareness. Situation and practice are the right settings for the tacit knowing of technology. Sensory and experience are the awareness path for the tacit knowing of technology. Examples and integrity are the pattern recognition for the tacit knowing of technology. Demonstration and exercise are the prior strategy for the tacit knowing of technology.
- technology knowledge /
- technology tacit knowledge /
- technology epistemology /
- cognitive characteristics /
- pragmatic knowing

HTML全文

参考文献(34)

[1]	爱因斯坦.(1976).爱因斯坦文集(第一卷)(许良英, 范岱年译).北京: 商务印书馆.
[2]	程海东, 刘炜.(2014).情境:技术认知的一个必要维度.科学技术哲学研究, 3, 59-64. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/wuljs201711007
[3]	费舍尔.(2008).在工作过程中学习工作过程知识(杨琳, 赵志群译).江苏技术师范学院学报, 23(4), 25-29. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zjtx200804006
[4]	格里门.(2005).默会知识和社会科学理论(刘立萍译).上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
[5]	郭本禹, 崔光辉. (2006).意向性:从布伦塔诺到麦农.华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 24(4), 50-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5560.2006.04.008
[6]	加洛蒂.(2015).认知心理学: 认知科学与你的生活(吴国宏译).北京: 机械工业出版社.
[7]	库恩.(1980).科学革命的结构(李宝恒, 纪树立译).上海: 上海科学技术出版社.
[8]	李永红.(2007).技术认识论探究——关于技术的现代反思.上海: 复旦大学博士学位论文. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=Y1171386
[9]	马克思, 恩格斯.(1972).马克思恩格斯全集(第23卷).北京:人民出版社.
[10]	谭笑.(2013).默会知识带来的厚实认识论.读书, 10, 59-66. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QKV20132013122500074714
[11]	威肯斯, 霍兰兹.(2003).工程心理学与人的作业(朱祖祥译).上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
[12]	维特根斯坦.(2001).哲学研究(陈嘉映译).上海: 上海人民出版社.
[13]	徐金雷, 顾建军.(2016).论技术知识及其默会维度.教育研究与实验, 5, 15-20. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QKC20162016113000114837
[14]	雅科米.(2000).技术史(蔓莙译).北京: 北京大学出版社.
[15]	杨文娇.(2014).隐形知识的理论与实践.青岛:中国海洋大学出版社.
[16]	叶浩生.(2011).有关具身认知思潮的理论心理学思考.心理学报, 5, 589-598. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201105012
[17]	叶浩生.(2014)."具身"涵义的理论辨析.心理学报, 7, 1032-1042. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201407013
[18]	郁振华. (2010).再论亲知——从罗素到凯农.华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 42(4), 1-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5579.2010.04.001
[19]	郁振华.(2012).人类知识的默会维度.北京:北京大学出版社.
[20]	赵志群.(2003).职业教育与培训新概念.北京:教育科学出版社.
[21]	朱春艳, 陈凡.(2011).语境论与技术哲学发展的当代特征.科学技术哲学研究, 28(2), 21-22. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/kxjsybzf201102004
[22]	Brownhill, R.J. (1983). Education and the Nature of Knowledge. London and Canberra: Croom Helm.
[23]	Dall'Alba, G., & Barnacle, R. (2005). Embodied Knowing in Online Environments, Educational Philosophy and Theory, (50), 719-744. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=10.1177/1050651906293527
[24]	Holyoak, K. J., & Koh, K. (1987). Surface and Structural Similarity in Analogical Transfer, Memory & Cognition, 15(4), 332-340. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/3670053
[25]	Inui, T.(2008).Experimental Approach to Embodied Cognition, Japanese Psychological Research, (48), 123-125. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5884.2006.00313.x/full
[26]	Johannessen, K.S. (1990).Rule-Following and Intransitive Understanding. In Göranzon, B., Florin M. (eds). Artificial Intelligence, Culture and Language: On Education and Work. (The Springer Series on Artificial Intelligence and Society). London: Springer.
[27]	Johannessen, K.S. (1996). Action Research and Epistemology:Some Remarks Concerning the Activity-Relatedness and Contextuality of Human Language. Concepts and Transformation, (1), 281-297. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/jbp/cat/1996/00000001/F0020002/art00010
[28]	Johannessen, K. S.(2007). Knowledge and Its Modes of Articulation. In Nils, G and Harald, G(eds). Discursive Modernity, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
[29]	McGinn, R.E.(1978) What is Technology.in P. T. Durb (ed.), Research in Philosophy & Technology, (1), 181.
[30]	Mitcham, C.(1978).Types of Technology. Research in Philosophy & Technology, (1), 229-294. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lxxb-e201802002
[31]	Pitt. J. C. (2000). Thinking about Technology:Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology. New York:Seven Bridges Press.
[32]	Polanyi, M. (1969). Knowing and Being. London: Marjorie Grene.
[33]	Thompson E, & Varela F.J.(2001) Radical Embodiment:Neural Dynamics and Consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5(1), 418-425. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hbyx201707004
[34]	Wittgenstein, L. (1977). Remarks on Colour, edited by G.E.M. Anscombe, Basil Blackwell Publisher.