多元民主制度中的教育问题

[加]M·霍姆斯

多元民主制度中的教育问题

[加]M·霍姆斯

详细信息

作者简介:
[加]M·霍姆斯：最近7年中，霍姆斯教授开设了有关教育管理、校园文化等方面的课程; 进行了关于教育经费、学业成绩与日后成功, 教育管理、大学入学考试等方面的个人研究; 参与了关于学校体制管理以及安大略英语成.就测验方面的集体研究s发表了论文、技术性报告、书评等多篇，为7部书撰写过章节，并出版了三本专著

*本文系作者于1991年12月应本刊专约而作。题目的原文为: The Problem of Education in a Plurlist Democracy——编者
计量
- 文章访问数: 122
- HTML全文浏览量: 356
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程

摘要

注释:

1) *本文系作者于1991年12月应本刊专约而作。题目的原文为: The Problem of Education in a Plurlist Democracy——编者

HTML全文

参考文献(20)

[1]	Bibby, R. W., & Posterski, D, C.1985.The emterging generation. Irwin: Toronto.
[2]	Coleman, J. S., & Hoffer, T, R, 1987. Prblic and private high schools : The im pact of commxnities. Basic Books: New York,
[3]	Duukheim, E.1956. Education and sociology. Free Press: Glencoe, Illinois.
[4]	Holmes, M.1984, Thevictory and failure of educational modernism. Issues in Education, 2(1), 23-25.
[5]	Holmes, M. 1985. Progressivism and traditionalism in Ontario education. In The house that Ryerson buill. Eds. H. Oliver, M. Holmes, and I, Winchester, OISE Press: Toronto, 31-45.
[6]	Holmes, M.1987.Traditionalism and educational administration.Jolrnal of Educational Adminisiration and Foundations, 1(2), 40-52.
[7]	Holmes, M.1988.The Fortress monastery : The futnre of the common core.In NSSE Yearbook : Cu1tura1 Literacy' and the Idea of General Education, Eds. I. Westbury and A. C. Purves. University of Chicago Press : Chicag0, 231-258.
[8]	Holmes, M。1989. Sch0ol effectiveness: From Tesearch to implentation to improvement. In Policy for Effective Schools, Eds. M. Holmes, K.A. Leithwood, and D. F.M usella. OISE Press. Toronto.
[9]	Holmes, M.1991a. Alasdair MaIntyte and school administration : After the collapse of the common school Paper presented to the annual conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Kin gston, Ontario.
[10]	Holmes, M.1991b. The values and beliefs of Ontario's chief education officers. In Understanding schoo. system administration: studies of the contem porary chief education officer. Eds. K.A. Leithwood, and D. F. Musella, Falmer Press : London, 155-174.
[11]	Holmes, M. Forthcoming. The promise of school im pr ovem ent: The New Jersey experiment.
[12]	Johnson, P,, 1983. Modern times . Harper and Row : New York.
[13]	Johnson, P,, 1991 The birlh of the modern. Weidenfeld and Nicholson: London.
[14]	Lapointe, A. E,, Mead, N. A. & Phillips, G.W.1989, A war1d of differences. Educational Testing Service; Princeton, New Jersey.
[15]	Lasch, C.1991.The true and only heaven. Nor ton; New York.
[16]	MacIntyre, A. 1981.After virtue. University of Notre Dame Press: Notre Dame, Indiana.
[17]	Radwanski, G.1987. Cntario study of the relevance of education, and the issue of dropouls. Ministry of Education : Toronto.
[18]	Scruton, R.1980.The meaning of conservatism. Penguin Books; Middlesex, England.
[19]	Taylor, C.1989. Sources of the self. H arvard University Press : Cambridge, Masaschusetts.
[20]	Tyack, D, & Hansot, E.1982. managers of virtue; Public schoo1 leadership in America, 1820-1980. Basic Books: New York.