-
摘要: 用两因素完全随机化实验方法研究了“主题描述”与“命名方式”两个因素对被试判定THOG问题的影响。结果表明，命名方式对THOG问题解决有显著影响，而主题描述对THOG问题解次没有显著影响。
-
表 1 不同THOG问题的命名方式和主题描述对照
表 2 两因素完全随机方差分析表
-
[1] Girto, V. legrenzi, P. (1989). Mental representation and hypothetico - deductive reasoning: The case of the THOG problem. Psychological Research, 51, 129- 135. doi: 10.1007/BF00309308 [2] Grotto, V, legrenzi, P. (1993). Naming the parents of the THOG; Mental representation and reasaning. Quarterly journal of Experimental psychology, 46A, 701 -713. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401034 [3] Griggs, R A, Newstead, S E. (1982). The role of problem structure in a deductive reasoning task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: language, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 297 - 307. [4] 胡竹箐, 余达祥, 戴海崎.内容类别与表征方式对判定THOG问题的影响[J].心理学报, 2002, 34 (3), 275-278. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB200203009.htm [5] Wason, P C, Brooks, P G.. (1979). THOG: The anatorny of a problem. Psychologjcal Research, 41: 79- 90.. doi: 10.1007/BF00309425 [6] Ziegler, A, Schober, B. (1995). Logical thinking: Smedlunds circle or the dichotorny of problamn - presentation and inferences. Psycboligiche Beiträge, 37, 181 - 198. [7] Newetead, SE, Griggs, RA. (1992). Thinking about THOG: Source of error in a deductive reasoning problem. Psychological research, 54, 299 - 305. [8] 胡竹箐.演绎推理的心理学研究[M].第1版.北京: 人民教育出版社, 2000. [9] Needham, W. P, Arnado, C. A. (1996). Facilitation and tansfer with narrative thenatic versions of the THOG task. Psychological Research, 54, 299- 305. [10] O'Brien, D. P, Noveck, I. A, Devidson, G. M, (1990). Source of difculty in deductive reasoning. Quately Joumal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 329 - 352. [11] Griggs, R. A, Koening, C. S, Alea. N. L. (2001). De - confusing the THOG problem: The Pythaorcan solution. The quarterly joumal of experimantal peychology, 54A (3), 921 -933. http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM11548041 -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(5) / 表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 133
- HTML全文浏览量: 152
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0