中国人文社会科学核心期刊

中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊

中文核心期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

人格判断的准确性:信息数量和质量的作用

陈少华 曾毅

陈少华, 曾毅. 人格判断的准确性:信息数量和质量的作用[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2013, 31(4): 69-74,81.
引用本文: 陈少华, 曾毅. 人格判断的准确性:信息数量和质量的作用[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2013, 31(4): 69-74,81.
Chen Shaohua, Zeng Yi. The Accuracy of Personality Judgment: The Effects of Information Quantity and Quality[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2013, 31(4): 69-74,81.
Citation: Chen Shaohua, Zeng Yi. The Accuracy of Personality Judgment: The Effects of Information Quantity and Quality[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2013, 31(4): 69-74,81.

人格判断的准确性:信息数量和质量的作用

基金项目: 

广州市哲学社会科学规划课题 2012GJ42

The Accuracy of Personality Judgment: The Effects of Information Quantity and Quality

  • 摘要: 良好的信息是影响人格判断准确性的重要调节变量, 信息是否良好取决于信息的数量和质量。信息数量假设认为, 判断者对判断目标的人格信息了解越多, 其人格判断越准确。当信息数量有限时, 内隐人格理论和假定相似性会通过额外信息影响判断的准确性。在信息数量相同的条件下, 信息质量决定了判断的准确性。对于准确的人格判断, 价值信息比事实信息更有效, 私密信息比公开信息更重要。此外, 情境强弱对行为信息的质量有重要影响。判断者与判断目标的熟悉度和关系质量是获取信息的关键。未来的研究应着手解决信息数量与质量的量化、人格判断的生态效度及其与其他变量交互作用等问题。
  • 图  1  信息质量工作模型(Beer & Brooks, 2011, p.182)

  • [1] 陈少华.(2013).人格判断:多维的视角.广州:暨南大学出版社, 26-31.
    [2] 陈少华, 赖庭红, 吴颢.(2012).关系质量对人格判断的影响及其对教育的启示.宁波大学学报(教育科学版), 34(2), 55-59. http://edu.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/Detail/gzdxxb-shkxb...
    [3] 陈少华, 吴颢, 赖庭红.(2013).人格判断的准确性:特质特性的作用.心理科学进展, 21(8), 1441-1449. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-XLXD201308014.htm
    [4] Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2012). 社会心理学(第7版). 侯玉波等译. 北京: 世界图书出版公司, 100-133.
    [5] Funder, D. (2009). 人格谜题(第4版). 许燕等译. 北京: 世界图书出版公司, 132-147.
    [6] Ames, D.R.(2004).Strategies for social inference:A similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 573-585. doi:  10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.573
    [7] Anderson, S.M.(1984).Self-knowledge and social inference:Ⅱ.The diagnosticity of cognitive/affective and behavioral data.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 294-307.
    [8] Beer, A., & Brooks, C.(2011).Information quality in personality judgment:The value of personal disclosure.Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 175-185. doi:  10.1016/j.jrp.2011.01.001
    [9] Beer, A., & Watson, D.(2008).Asymmetry in judgments of personality:Others are less differentiated than the self.Journal of Personality, 76, 535-560. doi:  10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00495.x
    [10] Beer, A., & Watson, D.(2010).The effects of information and exposure on self-other agreement.Journal Research in Personality, 44, 38-45. doi:  10.1016/j.jrp.2009.10.002
    [11] Biesanz, J.C., Human, L.J., Paquin, A.C., Chan, M., Parisotto, K.L., Sarracino, J., & Gillis, R.L.(2011).Do we know when our impressions of others are valid? Evidence for realistic accuracy awareness in first impressions of personality.Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 452-459. doi:  10.1177/1948550610397211
    [12] Blackman, M.C.(2002).Personality judgment and the utility of the unstructured employment interview.Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 241-250. doi:  10.1207/S15324834BASP2403_6
    [13] Blackman, M.C., & Funder, D.C.(1998).The effect of information on consensus and accuracy in personality judgment.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 164-181. doi:  10.1006/jesp.1997.1347
    [14] Chambers, J.R., Epley, N., Savitsky, K., & Windschitl, P.D.(2008).Knowing too much:Using private knowledge to predict how one is viewed by others.Psychological Science, 19, 542-548. doi:  10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02121.x
    [15] Funder, D.C.(1995).On the accuracy of personality judgment:A realistic approach.Psychological Review, 102, 652-670. doi:  10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.652
    [16] Funder, D.C.(1999).Personality judgment:A realistic approach to person perception.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
    [17] Funder, D.C.(2012).Accurate personality judgment.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 177-182. doi:  10.1177/0963721412445309
    [18] Human, L.J., & Biesanz, J.C.(2011).Through the looking glass clearly:Accuracy and assumed similarity in well-adjusted individuals' first impressions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 349-364. doi:  10.1037/a0021850
    [19] Letzring, T.D., Wells, S.M., & Funder, D.C.(2006).Information quantity and quality affect the realistic accuracy of personality judgment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 111-123. doi:  10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.111
    [20] Pronin, E., Fleming, J.J., & Steffel, M.(2008).Value revelations:Disclosure is in the eye of the beholder.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 795-809. doi:  10.1037/a0012710
    [21] Sherman, R.A., Nave, C.S., & Funder, D.C.(2010).Properties of persons and situations related to overall and distinctive personality-behavior congruence.Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 87-101. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009265661100167X#!
    [22] Vazire, S., & Gosling, S.D.(2004). E-Perceptions:Personality impressions based on personal websites.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 123-132. doi:  10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.123
    [23] Vazire, S.(2010).Who knows what about a person? The self-other knowledge asymmetry(SOKA) model.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 281-300. doi:  10.1037/a0017908
  • 加载中
图(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  263
  • HTML全文浏览量:  304
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 刊出日期:  2013-12-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回