知觉符号理论刍议

王瑞明; 莫雷

知觉符号理论刍议

王瑞明,
莫雷

华南师范大学心理应用研究中心，广州 510631

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目 30870783

国家自然科学基金项目 30900409

教育部人文社会科学研究项目 08JCXLX005

计量
- 文章访问数: 193
- HTML全文浏览量: 285
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 刊出日期: 2010-03-30

An Exploration of Perceptual Symbol Systems

摘要

摘要: 认知科学研究中一个核心问题是知识在头脑中是如何表征的。其中占主流的理论一直是命题符号理论，受体验哲学和体验认知的推动以及知觉和认知的关系发生转变的影响，Barsalou针对命题符号理论的不足提出了知觉符号理论。知觉符号理论做为第二代认知科学的代表性理论之一，提出后获得了许多实验证据的支持。当然，该理论也存在着一些问题，有待于研究者进一步探讨。
- 知觉符号理论 /
- 命题符号理论 /
- 第二代认知科学

HTML全文

参考文献(25)

[1]	Barasalou L W. Perceptual symbol system. Behavioral and Brain Science, 1999, 22: 577-660.
[2]	鲁忠义, 高志华, 段晓丽, 刘学华.语言理解的体验观.心理科学进展, 2007, 15: 275-281. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxdt200702014
[3]	李其维. "认知科学"与"第二代认知科学"刍议.心理学报, 2008, 40: 1306-1327. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=xlxb200812012&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
[4]	Newell A, Simon H A. Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1972.
[5]	Glaser W R. Picture naming. Cognition, 1992, 42: 61-105. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90040-O
[6]	Damasio A R. Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition, 1989, 33: 25-62. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90005-X
[7]	Kaschak M P, Glenberg A M. Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 2000, 43: 508-529. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2705
[8]	王瑞明, 莫雷, 李莹.知识表征的新观点—知觉符号理论.心理科学, 2005, 28: 738-740. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2005.03.064
[9]	Stanfield R A, Zwaan R A. The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 2001, 12: 153-156. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00326
[10]	Zwaan R A, Stanfield R A, Yaxley R H. Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 2002, 13: 168-171. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00430
[11]	王瑞明, 莫雷, 李利, 王穗苹, 吴俊.言语理解中的知觉符号表征与命题符号表征.心理学报, 2005, 37: 143-150. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb200502001
[12]	李莹, 王瑞明, 莫雷.物体隐含的形状信息对图画再认的影响.心理科学, 2005, 28: 588-590. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2005.03.019
[13]	李莹, 王瑞明, 莫雷.否定句理解中知觉仿真的动态过程.心理科学, 2007, 30: 791-795. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2007.04.006
[14]	Zwaan R A, Yaxley R H. Spatial iconicity affects semantic relatedness judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2003, 10: 954-958.
[15]	Zwaan R A, Yaxley R H. Hemispheric differences in semantic-relatedness judgments, Cognition, 2003, 87: 79-86. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00235-4
[16]	王瑞明, 莫雷, 伍丽梅, 李利.空间信息表征对语义相关判断的影响.心理科学, 2006, 29: 1320-1323. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2006.06.010
[17]	莫雷, 伍丽梅, 王瑞明.物体的空间关系对语义相关判断的影响.心理科学, 2006, 29: 770-773. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2006.04.001
[18]	Richardson D, Spivey M, McRae K, et al. Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 2003, 27: 767-780. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2705_4
[19]	伍丽梅, 莫雷, 王瑞明.动词理解中空间表征的激活过程, 心理学报, 2006, 38: 663-671. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb200605004
[20]	Zwaan R A, Madden C J, Yaxley R H, et al. Moving words: Dynamic mental representations in language comprehension. Cognitive Science, 2004, 28: 611-619.
[21]	Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The Mirror-Neuron System. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 2004, 27: 169-192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
[22]	Grossman M, Konig P, Devita C, et al. The neural basis for category-specific knowledge: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 2002, l5: 936-948.
[23]	Hauk O, Johnsrude I, Pulvermüller F. Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 2004, 41: 301-307. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00838-9
[24]	Pulvermüller F. Hauk O. Category-specific Conceptual Processing of Color and Form in Left Fronto-temporal. Cortex Cerebral, 2006, 16:1193-1201. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj060
[25]	Canessa N, Borgo F, Cappa S F, et al. The Different Neural Correlates of Action and Functional Knowledge in Semantic Memory: An fMRI Study. Cerebral Cortex, 2008, 18: 740-751. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm110