数字加工中的直觉

陈亚林; 刘昌

数字加工中的直觉

陈亚林,
刘昌

南京师范大学教育科学学院暨认知神经科学实验室，南京 210097

基金项目:

江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划资助项目 CXZZ11_0852

计量
- 文章访问数: 146
- HTML全文浏览量: 176
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 刊出日期: 2011-12-20

The Intuition in Number Processing

摘要

摘要: 数字能力是人类乃至动物的一项基本生存能力。近年来研究发现人类的数字加工中除了存在着理性加工外，还存在着直觉性加工。在数字编码的研究中，数字认知偏差揭示出存在着直觉性加工，研究者运用不同的理论进行解释。在数字运算的研究中，估算、直接提取加工以及距离效应和奇偶效应都揭示出了直觉性加工的存在。未来研究需注重研究其他领域的数字编码，从加工方式的角度对数字运算中的特定现象提出一定理论解释，以及注重探讨其潜在的实用价值等。
- 数字编码 /
- 数字运算 /
- 直觉 /
- 理性

HTML全文

参考文献(34)

[1]	Barrett, L.F., Tugade, M.M., & Engle, R.W.(2004). Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Dual-Process Theories of the Mind. Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 553-573. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553
[2]	Evans, J.S.B.T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 454-459. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012
[3]	Peters, E., Vastfjall, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C.K., Mozzocco, K. & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17, 406-413.
[4]	Reyna, V.F. & Brainerd, C.J. (2008). Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(1), 89-107. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.011
[5]	von Sydow, M. (2011). The Bayesian logic of frequency-based conjunction fallacies. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55(2), 119-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2010.12.001
[6]	曾守锤、李其维: 《模糊痕迹理论: 对经典认知发展理论的挑战》, 《心理科学》2004年第2期. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFD2004&filename=XLKX200402072&v=MjI3NDl0WE1yWTlDWm9SOGVYMUx1eFlTN0RoMVQzcVRyV00xRnJDVVJMMmVaZWRtRnlIaFc3ckFQU0hBZHJHNEg=
[7]	Campbell, J.I.D., Parker, H.R., & Doetzel, N.L. (2004). Interactive Effects of Numerical Surface Form and Operand Parity in Cognitive Arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 51-64. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.51
[8]	胡林成、熊哲宏: 《数能力的模块性—Dehaene的"神经元复用"理论述评》, 《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》2008年第1期. http://kns.cnki.net/kns/detail/detail.aspx?QueryID=8&CurRec=1&recid=&FileName=HDXK200801012&DbName=CJFD2008&DbCode=CJFQ&yx=&pr=&URLID=
[9]	Yagoubi, R.E., Lemaire, P., & Besson, M. (2003). Different brain mechanisms mediate two strategies in arithmetic: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Neuropsychologia, 41(7), 855-862. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00180-X
[10]	Núñez-Peña, M.I., Cortiñas, M., & Escera, C. (2006). Problem size effect and processing strategies in mental arithmetic. NeuroReport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 17(4), 357-360.
[11]	刘昌: 《心算加工的认知神经科学研究》, 《心理科学》2006年第1期. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFD2006&filename=XLKX200601007&v=MDAzNDFyQ1VSTDJlWmVkbUZ5RGtVcnpJUFNIQWRyRzRIdGZNcm85Rlk0UjhlWDFMdXhZUzdEaDFUM3FUcldNMUY=
[12]	DeStefano, D. & LeFevre, J.-A. (2004). The role of working memory in mental arithmetic. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(3), 353-386. doi: 10.1080/09541440244000328
[13]	Jost, K., Hennighausen, E. & Röser, F. (2004). Comparing arithmetic and semantic fact retrieval: Effects of problem size and sentence constraint on event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 41(1), 46-59. doi: 10.1111/psyp.2004.41.issue-1
[14]	Windschitl, P.D. (2002). Judging the accuracy of a likelihood judgement: The case of smoking risk. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 19-35. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0771
[15]	Yi, R. & Bickel, W.K. (2005). Representation of odds in terms of frequencies reduces probability discounting. The Psychological Record, 55(4), 577-593. doi: 10.1007/BF03395528
[16]	Slovic, P., Monahan, J., & MacGregor, D.G. (2000). Violence risk assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 271-296. doi: 10.1023/A:1005595519944
[17]	Slovic, P., Finucane, M.L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D.G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal., 24, 1-12. doi: 10.1111/risk.2004.24.issue-1
[18]	Pacini, R. & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic believes, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 972-987. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.972
[19]	Reyna, V.F. (2004). How people make decisions that involve risk. A dual-processes approach. Curr Dir Psychol Sci., 13(2), 60-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00275.x
[20]	Kahneman, D. (2003). A Perspective on Judgment and Choice: Mapping Bounded Rationality. American Psychologist, 58(September), 697-720. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
[21]	Reyna, V.F. & Lloyd, F.J. (2006). Physician decision-making and cardiac risk: Effects of knowledge, risk perception, risk tolerance, and fuzzy processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 12, 179-195. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.12.3.179
[22]	Lemer, C., Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., & Cohen, L. (2003). Approximate quantities and exact number words: Dissociable systems. Neuropsychologia, 41(14), 1942-1958. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00123-4
[23]	Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284(5416), 970-974.
[24]	Kalaman, D.A. & LeFevre, J.-A. (2007). Working memory demands of exact and approximate addition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(2), 187-212. doi: 10.1080/09541440600713445
[25]	Klein, E., Nuerk, H.-C., Wood, G., Knops, A., & Willmes, K. (2009). The exact vs. approximate distinction in numerical cognition may not be exact, but only approximate: How different processes work together in multi-digit addition. Brain and Cognition, 69(2), 369-381. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.031
[26]	Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3-6), 487-506. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000239
[27]	LeFevre, J.-A., Sadesky, G.S., & Bisanz, J. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem size effect in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 216-230.
[28]	Kong, J., Wang, C., Kwong, K., Vangel, M., Chua, E., & Gollub, R. (2005). The neural substrate of arithmetic operations and procedure complexity. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(3), 397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.011
[29]	Kazui, H., Kitagaki, H., & Mori, E. (2000). Cortical activation during retrieval of arithmetical facts and actual calculation: A functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging study. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 54(4), 479-485. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1819.2000.00739.x
[30]	Vandorpe, S., De Rammelaere, S., & Vandierendonck, A. (2005). The Odd-Even Effect in Addition: An Analysis per Problem Type. Experimental Psychology, 52(1), 47-54. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.1.47
[31]	Núñez-Peña, M.I. & Escera, C. (2007). An event-related brain potential study of the arithmetic split effect. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 64(2), 165-173. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.01.007
[32]	Krueger, L.E. & Hallford, E.W. (1984). Why 2+2 = 5 looks so wrong: On the odd-even rule in sum verification. Memory & Cognition, 12(2), 171-180.
[33]	Lochy, A., Seron, X., Delazer, M., & Butterworth, B. (2000). The odd-even effect in multiplication: Parity rule or familiarity with even numbers? Memory & Cognition, 28(3), 358-365.
[34]	陈亚林、刘昌、张小将、徐晓东、沈汪兵: 《心算活动中混合策略选择的ERP研究》, 《心理学报》2011年第4期. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFD2011&filename=XLXB201104005&v=MTMzODNUYkxHNEg5RE1xNDlGWVlSOGVYMUx1eFlTN0RoMVQzcVRyV00xRnJDVVJMMmVaZWRtRnlEa1Vyck1QU0g=