概念的多重表征形式及其双极结构模型

邵志芳

概念的多重表征形式及其双极结构模型

邵志芳

华东师范大学心理学系，上海 200062

详细信息

作者简介:
邵志芳（1964—），男，华东师范大学心理学系副教授，心理学博士，主要研究方向：认知心理学

中图分类号: B84
计量
- 文章访问数: 235
- HTML全文浏览量: 278
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2006-06-01
- 刊出日期: 2006-12-01

摘要

摘要: 本文对于概念形成理论的流派和阵营进行了进一步的精细考察，提出五大流派探讨的分别是概念的不同的表征方式，而这些表征方式之间在表征的逻辑性和灵活性上是有鲜明的递进关系的，可以建构起一个双极结构。基于解释的阵营与基于相似性的阵营相比，只不过是运用了新一层次的相似性而已。本文阐述了概念的多重表征———基于规则的表征、基于线索的表征、基于样例的表征、基于图式的表征，以及这四种表征形式的双极结构模型。
- 规则 /
- 线索 /
- 样例 /
- 图式 /
- 双极模型

HTML全文

图 1 概念的多重表征及其双极结构

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(16)

[1]	L.K. Komatsu, (1992).Recent Views of Conceptual Structure.Psychological BIulletin, 112, 500- 526.
[2]	R.J. Sternberg, & T.Ben-Zeey, (2001)Complex Cognition : the Psychology of Human Thought.Oxford University Press.
[3]	R.J. Sternberg, (2003). Cognitive psychology, Belmont, CA : Thomson Wadsworth.
[4]	J.S. Bruner, J.J.Goodnow, & G.A. Austin\|(1956). A Study of Thinking. New York, Wiley.
[5]	R.T. Kellogg, (1982).Hypothesis Recognition Failure in Conjunctive and Disjunctive Concept-ldentification Tasks.Memory & Cognition, 19, 327- 330.
[6]	A.S. Reber, (1967), Implicit Learning of Artificial Grammars, Journal of Verbal learning and VerbalBehavior, 77, 317-327
[7]	A. s. Reber, (1993), Implicit Learning and Tacit knoroledge: An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious, New York: Oxford University Press.
[8]	D. E. Dulany, R. A. Carlson, & G. 1. Dewey, (1984). A Case of Syntactical Learming and Judgment: How conscious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 541 - 555.
[9]	P. Perruchet, & C. Pacteau, (1990). Synthetie Grammar Leaming: Implieit Rule Abstraction or Explicit Fragmentary Knowledge? Jounal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 264 - 275.
[10]	E. Servan- Schreiber, & J. R. Anderson, (1990). Leaning Arifeial Grammars with Competitive Chunking. Joumal of Experimental P'sychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 592 - 608.
[11]	E. Rosch, (1973). Natural Categories. Cognire Psychology, 4, 328 - 350.
[12]	R. Martin, & A. Caramazza, (1980). Classification in Well - defined and Il - Defined Categories: Evidence for Common Processing Strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109 (3), 320- 353.
[13]	s. L. Amstrong, L. R. Gleitman, & H. Gleitman, (1983). What Some Concepts Might Not Be. Cognition, 13, 263 - 308.
[14]	J. D. Smith, & J P. Minda, (2000 Thirty Categorzaion Results in Search of A Model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 3- 27.
[15]	L. w. Barsalou, (1983). Ad Hoe Categories. Memory and Cognition, 11, 211- 227.
[16]	L. J. Rips, (1989). Similariy, Typicality, and Categorization. In s. Vosniadouu & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similariry and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.