-
摘要: 本文依据皮亚杰的经典理论,对某些旨在否定皮亚杰理论的实验及其解释作了深刻的反思和批评,从而表明皮亚杰理论仍然具有很强的生命力。
-
[1] R. Baillargeon, E. S. Spelke & S. Wasserman (1985). Object Permnanence in Five Month-0ld Infants. Coguition, 20, pp.191- 208. [2] M. Bovet & J. Vonèche (1977). Is Child Stimulation Effective? In A. Oliverio (Ed.) Genetics, Environment and Intelligence. Amsterdam: Elsevier/ North Holland Biomedical press. [3] T.C. R. Bower (1967). The Development of Object-Permanence: Some Studies of Existence Constancy. Perception and Psychophysics, 2, pp.411 -418. [4] T.C. R. Bower & J. G. Wishart (1972). The Fffeet of Mother Skills on Object Pemanence. Cognition, 1, pp.165-172. [5] M. Donaldson (1978). Children's Minds. Clasgow: W. Collins Sons and Co. [6] J. Fodor (1972). Some Reflections on L. S. Vygotsky's Thought and Language. Cognition, 1, pp.83- 95. [7] R. Gelman (1991). Epigenetic Foundations of Knowledge Structures: Initial and Transcendent Constructions. In R. Celman & S. Carey (Eds.) The Epigenesis of Mind: Essays on Biology and Cognition. Hillsdale, N. J: Erlbaum. [8] B. lnhelder & G. Cellérier (1992). Le cheminement des découvertes de l'enfant. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niesule. [9] B. Inhelder & J. Piaget (1955). De la logique de l'enfant à la logique de l'adolescent: essai sur la construction des strutures opératoires formelles. Paris: P.U.F.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 177
- HTML全文浏览量: 244
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0