试论教育政策研究分类的理论基础

谢少华

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2002.01.009

试论教育政策研究分类的理论基础

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2002.01.009

谢少华

华南师范大学教科院教管系，广州 510631

①B. Haynes(1987). Educational Policy Studies : Guide, pro-duced by Edith Cowan University for WADEC, p. 10.
②I. Gordon, J. lewis & K. Young(1977). Perspectives on Policy Analysis, in Public Administration Bulletin, 25, pp.26-35.
③J. G. Cibulka(1994). Plicy Analysis and the Study of Edu-cation, in Journal of Education Policy 9, 5- 6, p.107(Special Is-sue: The Study of Educational Ploitics, Politics of Education Associ- ation Yearbook 1994).
④J.J. Prunty(1984). A Critical Reformulation of Educational Policy Analysis, Victoria: Deakin University, P. 8.
⑤S. Taylor, F. Rizvi, B. Lingard & M. Henry(1997). Educa-tional policy and the poitics of chunge, Routledge, 11, New Ftter Lane, London, p.37.
⑥T. Kuhn(1962). The Structure of Scientific revolutions, Uni-versity of Chicago Press, Chicago..
⑦C. Burell & C. Morgan (1979). Sociological Puradigms and Organizational Analysis : Elernents of the Sociology of Corporate Life, London: Heinemnann, p. 10.
⑧C. Morgan(1980). Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solv-ing in organization theory, Administrative Science Quanterly, 25(4), pp.605-22.
⑨G. Burrell & G. Morgan(1979). Sociologncal Pardigms and Organizational Analysis : Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life, London: Heinemann, p.3, p.22.
⑩G. Burrell & G. Morgan(1979). Sociologncal Pardigms and Organizational Analysis : Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life, London: Heinemann, p.3, p.22.
⑪T. Dye(1978). Understanding Public Poliay, 3^nd edn, Pren-tiee Hall, Englewood, Cifi, N.
⑫J. E. Anderson. (1979). Public Policgy-Making, 2^nd edn, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, NY.
⑬C. C. Yeakey(1983). Emerging policy research in educa-tional research and decisionmaking, in E. Gordon(ed.), Review ofResearch in Education，Vol.10, American Educational Research As-sociation, Weashington, DC.
⑭M. Carley(1980). Rational Techniques in Policy Analysis, Heinemann Educational Books, London, p.11.
⑮cf C. Lindblom(1959). The science of muddling through, Public Administration 19, pp.79-88. C. Lindblom(1964). 7he In-teligence of Democracy，Macmillan, New York. C. Lindblom(1968).The Policy-Making Process, Prentice Hall, New York. C. Lindblom & D. Braybroke(1963). The Strategy of Decision, Free Press, NewYork.
⑯E. C. B. Schoettle(1968). The state of the art in policystudies, in R. A. Bauer & K.s. Gergen(eds), The Sudy of Policy Formation, Free Press, New York, p151.
⑰A. Exzioni (1967). Mixed Scanning: A“third" approach to decision-making Public Administration Rerierw 28, pp.385-92.
⑱K. E. Boulding(1964). Review of A Stralegy of Decision in American Sociological Reriew 29, p. 931.
⑲Y. Dror(1964). Muddling throughr* science' or inertia? in Public Administration Rerierw 24, p. 155..
⑳I. R. Hoos(1972). Systems Analysis in Public Policy: A Critique, University of Califomia Press, Berkeley.
㉑W. C. Mitchell(1968). Systems analysis: Political systemns, in D. Sills(ed.) Inuternational Encyclopedia of the Socral Science, Vol. 15, Macmilan and Free Press, New York, pp. 473- 79.
㉒CF., D.Truman(1951). The Govenumerul Process, Knopf, New York. E. Latham(1956). The group basis of polities: Notes for a theory, in H. Eulau, S. Eldersveld & M. Janowits(eds), Political behuvior, Free Press, New York. Latham, E. (1965), The grop bu- sis of politics, Octagon Books, New York.
㉓C. C. Yeakey(1983). Emerging policy research in educa-tional research and decisionmnaking, in E. Gordon(ed.), Rerierv of Research in Educaton, Vol, 10, Amencan Educational Research As-sociation, Washington, DC, p. 268.
㉔J. E. Anderson (1979). Public Policy-Making, 2^nd edn, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, NY, p. 18.
㉕T. Hunter(1953). Community Pouer Stuture, Universty of North Carolina Press.
㉖C. w. Mills(1959). The Sociological Imagination, Oxford University Press, New York, p. 46.
㉗T. R. Dye & L. H. Zeigler(1978). The Iromry of Democracy: An Unconmon Introduction to American Politics, 4^th edn, Duxbury Press, North Scituate, Mass., pp.6- 7.
㉘J.J. Punty(1984). A Crial Reformulation of Educational Polcy Analysis. Victoria: Deakin Unversity, pp.42-3.
㉙S. T. Taylor & R. Bogdoan(1984). Introluction to qualita-tiue reearch methods : The search for meanings(2^nd ed.). New Yark: Wiley, pp.32 -3.
㉚R. Dale(1994). Applied educution politics or political soci-ology of education? In Halpin, D. & Troyna, B. (eds) Researching education policy, ethical and methodological issues, London: The Falmer Press.
㉛J. Finch:(1984). Research and policy: the use of qualitatiue methds in social and educutional research, London: The Falmer Press, p.231.
㉜S. Ball(1994). Education refom: a critioul and post-sruc-tural approuch. Buckingham, London: Open University Press, p.2.
计量
- 文章访问数: 185
- HTML全文浏览量: 186
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2001-09-01
- 刊出日期: 2002-03-01

摘要

摘要: 本文针对目前我国教育政策研究理论基础薄弱和实践范围或类别狭窄的现状，提出拓展范围与丰富基础理论是我国教育政策研究面临的挑战。在评价众多教育政策学者的分类法的基础上，尝试将教育政策研究在技术操作性层面上分为四大类。进而，笔者以更高层次的社会观和科学观为依据，重点评述了占据当今国内外教育政策研究主流的六大理论流派。
- 教育政策研究 /
- 分类 /
- 理论基础
注释:

1) ①B. Haynes(1987). Educational Policy Studies : Guide, pro-duced by Edith Cowan University for WADEC, p. 10.

2) ②I. Gordon, J. lewis & K. Young(1977). Perspectives on Policy Analysis, in Public Administration Bulletin, 25, pp.26-35.

3) ③J. G. Cibulka(1994). Plicy Analysis and the Study of Edu-cation, in Journal of Education Policy 9, 5- 6, p.107(Special Is-sue: The Study of Educational Ploitics, Politics of Education Associ- ation Yearbook 1994).

4) ④J.J. Prunty(1984). A Critical Reformulation of Educational Policy Analysis, Victoria: Deakin University, P. 8.

5) ⑤S. Taylor, F. Rizvi, B. Lingard & M. Henry(1997). Educa-tional policy and the poitics of chunge, Routledge, 11, New Ftter Lane, London, p.37.

6) ⑥T. Kuhn(1962). The Structure of Scientific revolutions, Uni-versity of Chicago Press, Chicago..

7) ⑦C. Burell & C. Morgan (1979). Sociological Puradigms and Organizational Analysis : Elernents of the Sociology of Corporate Life, London: Heinemnann, p. 10.

8) ⑧C. Morgan(1980). Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solv-ing in organization theory, Administrative Science Quanterly, 25(4), pp.605-22.

9) ⑨G. Burrell & G. Morgan(1979). Sociologncal Pardigms and Organizational Analysis : Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life, London: Heinemann, p.3, p.22.

10) ⑩G. Burrell & G. Morgan(1979). Sociologncal Pardigms and Organizational Analysis : Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life, London: Heinemann, p.3, p.22.

11) ⑪T. Dye(1978). Understanding Public Poliay, 3^nd edn, Pren-tiee Hall, Englewood, Cifi, N.

12) ⑫J. E. Anderson. (1979). Public Policgy-Making, 2^nd edn, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, NY.

13) ⑬C. C. Yeakey(1983). Emerging policy research in educa-tional research and decisionmaking, in E. Gordon(ed.), Review ofResearch in Education，Vol.10, American Educational Research As-sociation, Weashington, DC.

14) ⑭M. Carley(1980). Rational Techniques in Policy Analysis, Heinemann Educational Books, London, p.11.

15) ⑮cf C. Lindblom(1959). The science of muddling through, Public Administration 19, pp.79-88. C. Lindblom(1964). 7he In-teligence of Democracy，Macmillan, New York. C. Lindblom(1968).The Policy-Making Process, Prentice Hall, New York. C. Lindblom & D. Braybroke(1963). The Strategy of Decision, Free Press, NewYork.

16) ⑯E. C. B. Schoettle(1968). The state of the art in policystudies, in R. A. Bauer & K.s. Gergen(eds), The Sudy of Policy Formation, Free Press, New York, p151.

17) ⑰A. Exzioni (1967). Mixed Scanning: A“third" approach to decision-making Public Administration Rerierw 28, pp.385-92.

18) ⑱K. E. Boulding(1964). Review of A Stralegy of Decision in American Sociological Reriew 29, p. 931.

19) ⑲Y. Dror(1964). Muddling throughr* science' or inertia? in Public Administration Rerierw 24, p. 155..

20) ⑳I. R. Hoos(1972). Systems Analysis in Public Policy: A Critique, University of Califomia Press, Berkeley.

21) ㉑W. C. Mitchell(1968). Systems analysis: Political systemns, in D. Sills(ed.) Inuternational Encyclopedia of the Socral Science, Vol. 15, Macmilan and Free Press, New York, pp. 473- 79.

22) ㉒CF., D.Truman(1951). The Govenumerul Process, Knopf, New York. E. Latham(1956). The group basis of polities: Notes for a theory, in H. Eulau, S. Eldersveld & M. Janowits(eds), Political behuvior, Free Press, New York. Latham, E. (1965), The grop bu- sis of politics, Octagon Books, New York.

23) ㉓C. C. Yeakey(1983). Emerging policy research in educa-tional research and decisionmnaking, in E. Gordon(ed.), Rerierv of Research in Educaton, Vol, 10, Amencan Educational Research As-sociation, Washington, DC, p. 268.

24) ㉔J. E. Anderson (1979). Public Policy-Making, 2^nd edn, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, NY, p. 18.

25) ㉕T. Hunter(1953). Community Pouer Stuture, Universty of North Carolina Press.

26) ㉖C. w. Mills(1959). The Sociological Imagination, Oxford University Press, New York, p. 46.

27) ㉗T. R. Dye & L. H. Zeigler(1978). The Iromry of Democracy: An Unconmon Introduction to American Politics, 4^th edn, Duxbury Press, North Scituate, Mass., pp.6- 7.

28) ㉘J.J. Punty(1984). A Crial Reformulation of Educational Polcy Analysis. Victoria: Deakin Unversity, pp.42-3.

29) ㉙S. T. Taylor & R. Bogdoan(1984). Introluction to qualita-tiue reearch methods : The search for meanings(2^nd ed.). New Yark: Wiley, pp.32 -3.

30) ㉚R. Dale(1994). Applied educution politics or political soci-ology of education? In Halpin, D. & Troyna, B. (eds) Researching education policy, ethical and methodological issues, London: The Falmer Press.

31) ㉛J. Finch:(1984). Research and policy: the use of qualitatiue methds in social and educutional research, London: The Falmer Press, p.231.

32) ㉜S. Ball(1994). Education refom: a critioul and post-sruc-tural approuch. Buckingham, London: Open University Press, p.2.