中国人文社会科学核心期刊

中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊

中文核心期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

SSI课程与学生非形式推理能力的培养

张奇 张黎

张奇, 张黎. SSI课程与学生非形式推理能力的培养[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2007, 25(2): 59-64,86. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2007.02.011
引用本文: 张奇, 张黎. SSI课程与学生非形式推理能力的培养[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2007, 25(2): 59-64,86. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2007.02.011

SSI课程与学生非形式推理能力的培养

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2007.02.011
基金项目: 

教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地基金资助 06JJDXLX001

详细信息
    作者简介:

    张奇(1955—), 男, 辽宁师范大学教育学院心理系教授

  • 中图分类号: Q948

  • 摘要: 作者介绍了美国等一些发达国家开设SSI课程, 培养学生非形式推理能力的有关研究和教育实践概况, 论述了在我国开创SSI课程, 培养学生非形式推理能力的现实意义和深远历史意义, 并对开创符合我国国情的SSI课程提出了建议、实施步骤和研究任务。
  • [1] Driver, R.Newton, P.Osborne, J.(2002).Estab-lishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms.S cience Education, 84: 287 -312.
    [2] Kolst, S.D.(2001a)Scientific literacy for citizen-ship : tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues.Science Education, 85 : 291 -310.
    [3] Zeidler, D.L.(1984).Moral issues and social policy in science education : closing the literacy gap.Science Education, 68 : 411 -419.
    [4] Kuhn, D.(1993).Science as argument : implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77 : 319-337.
    [5] Sadler, T.D, Zeidler, D.L.(2004).Patten of infor-mal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision -making.Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Nashville.
    [6] Perkins, D.N.(1985).Post -primary education has little impact upon informal reasoning.Journal of Educational Psy-chology, 77 : 562 -571.
    [7] Kuhn, D.(1993).Science as argument : implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77 : 319-337.
    [8] Zohar, A, Nemet, F.(2002).Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human ge-netics.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39: 35 -62.
    [9] Patronis, T, Potari, D, Spiliotopoulou, V.(1999). Students' arugumentation in decision-making on a socio -scien-tific issue : implications for teaching.International Journal of Sci-ence Education, 21 : 745-754.
    [10] Aikenhead, G. (2004).What is STS in science teaching?.In : D.L.Zeidler, T D.Sadler Beyond STS : A re-search-based framework for socioscientific issues education.An-nual Meeting of the National Association for Research in S cience Teaching, Vancouver.
    [11] Geddis, A.N.(1991).Improving the quality of sci-ence classroom discourse on controversial issues.Science Educa-tion, 75 (2): 169 -183.
    [12] Zeidler, D.L, Walker, K.A, Ackett, W.A, et al. (2002).Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas.Science Education, 86 (3): 343 -367.
    [13] Sadler, T.D, Chambers, F.W, Zeidler, D.L. (2004).Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in re-sponse to a socioscientific issue.International Journal of Science E-ducation, 26 : 387 -409.
    [14] Voss, J.F, Blais, J.Means, M.L.(1986).Infor-mal reasoning and subject matter know ledge in the solving of eco-nomics problems by na? ve and novice individuals.Cognition and Instruction, 3 (4): 269 -302.
    [15] Kolst, S.D.(2001b).' To trust or not to trust, ...' —pupils' ways of judging information encountered in a so-cioscientific issue [J].International Journal of Science Educa-tion, 23 : 877 -901.
    [16] Sadler, T.D, Chambers, F.W, Zeidler, D.L. (2002).Investigating the crossroads of the nature of science, so-cioscientific issues, and critical thinking.Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Or-leans.
    [17] Pedretti, E.(1999).Decision making and STS edu-cation : exploring scientific knowledge and social responsibility in schools and science centers through an issues -based approach. School.Science and Mathematics, 99 : 174 -181.
    [18] Zohar, A.Weinberger, Y.Tamir, P. (1994).The effect of the biology critical thinking project on the development of critical thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31 (2): 183 -196.
    [19] Gelder, T.V.(2000).Learning to reason : a rea-son! albe approach.the Fifth Australasian Cognitive Science Soci-ety Conference, Adelaide.
    [20] Sadler, T.D.(2004).Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues : a critical review of research.Journal of Re-search in Science teaching, 41 (5): 513 -536.
    [21] Simonneaux, L.(2001).Role-play or debate to pro-mote students' argumentation and justificationon an issue in animal transgenesis.International Journal of Science Education, 23 : 903 -927.
    [22] Hogan, K.(2002).Small groups' ecological reason- ing while making an environmental managementdecision.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 : 341-368.
    [23] Sadler, T.D, Zeidler, D.L.(2005).The signifi-cance of content know ledge for informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues : applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues.S cience Education, 89 (1): 71 -93
    [24] Walker, K.A, Zeidler, D.L.(2003).Students'understanding of the nature of science and their reasoning on socio-scientific issues : A Web -based learning inquiry.Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.
    [25] Pedretti, E.(2003).Teaching science, technology, society and environment (STSE)education : preservice teachers' philosophical and pedagogical landscapes. In : D.L.Zeidler The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues anddiscourse in sci-ence education.Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press, 219-240.
    [26] Keefer, M.W.(2003).Moral reasoning and case - based approaches to ethical instruction in science. In : D. L.Zeidler The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse inscience education. Netherlands : Kluwer Academic.Press, 241 -260.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  113
  • HTML全文浏览量:  200
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2007-01-01
  • 刊出日期:  2007-06-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回