-
摘要: 本研究尝试从关系自我发展角度, 对2—6年级学生的目标投入进行想象干预实验, 旨在探索目标投入干预手段, 进而透视儿童自我发展特征。各年级被试由四个实验组和1个控制组组成。四个实验组分别从自己父母老师好朋友四种角度, 想象目标实现时的感受。实验结果表明, 不同年级儿童想象干预效果在一定程度上反映了自我表征取向的发展变化。通过想象自己和重要他人对自己目标实现与否的反应, 能够有效促进儿童的目标投入。
-
2.1 想象干预内容
3.1 控制组-实验组干预结果比较
3.2 干预结果方差分析
3.3 不同角度想象干预比较
3.4 干预结果的年级比较
3.5 “自己”角度干预效果的年级比较
3.6 “朋友”角度干预效果的年级比较
3.7 “父母”角度干预效果的年级比较
3.8 “老师”角度干预效果的年级比较
-
[1] Klinger, E.(1975)Consequences of commitment to and disengagement from incentives.Psychological Review, 82, 1 25. http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/rev/82/1/1 [2] Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P..(2002)Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and taskmotivation(A 35-year odyssey). doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705 [3] American Psychologis, .57(9).pp.705 -717. [4] Dweck, C.S.(1991)Self -theories and goals :Their role in motivation, personality, and development, In Dienstbier, R.A.(ed.), Perspectives on Motivation, Lincoln and London :University of Nebrraska Press. doi: 10.3102/00028312029003663 [5] Higgins, E.T.et al (1994) Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance:distinct self-regulatory systems, Journal ofpersonality and social psychology, 66: doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.2.276 [6] Markus, H.&Nuris, P. (1986) Possible selves.American Psychologist., 41, 954-969. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954 [7] Oettingen, G.Hyeon-ju Pak, Schnetter, K.. (2001) Self-regulation of goal setting:Turning free fantansies about the future intobinding goals.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.80 (5) :736-753. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.736 [8] 李晓文.学生自我发展之心理学探究[M].教育科学出版社, 2001年. [9] Oettingen, G.Hyeon -ju Pak, Schnetter, K..(2001)Self -regulation of goal setting : Turning free fantansies about the future into binding goals.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.80(5): 736 -753. [10] Hermans, H.J.M.The dialogical self:one person, different stories.In Y.Kashima, M.Foddy&M.J.Platow (Eds.) , Selfand identity:Personal, social and symbolic, (pp.71-100.) Mahaw, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.1.2002.pp.79-81. [11] Brewer M B, Gardner W.(1996), Who is this "we"? Levels of collective identity and self representations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1).pp.83 ~ 93. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83 [12] Sedikides, Constantine, and Marilynn B.Brewer, eds. (2001) .Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self:Partners, Oppo-nents, or Strangers?Philadelphia:Psychology Press. [13] Brewer M B, Gardner W.(1996), Who is this "we"? Levels of collective identity and self representations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1).pp.83 ~ 93. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&filename=XLKX199301002 [14] Sedikides, Constantine, andMarilynn B.Brewer, eds.(2001).Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self : Partners, Opponents, or Strangers? Philadelphia: Psychology Press. [15] Shil’Shtein, E.S. (2001) Characteristics of the Presentation of the Self During Adolescence, Russian Education and Society, 43 (6) , June, pp.35?51. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=6297858&site=ehost-live [16] Smith-Lovin, L. (2002) .Roles Identity and Emotion:Parallel processing and the Production of Mixed Emotion In Y.Kashima, M.Foddy&M.J.Platow (Eds.) , Self and identity:Personal, social and symbolic.Mahaw, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.pp.125-144. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/288255646_Roles_identities_and_emotions_Parallel_processing_and_the_production_of_mixed_emotions [17] Meeus, W.Iedema, J.Maassen, G.Engels, R. (2005) .Separation?individuation revisited:on the interplay of parent?adolescentrelations, identity and emotional adjustment in adolescence.Journal of Adolescence 28.pp.89-106. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.07.003