-
摘要: 通过文献综述、访谈和开放式问卷调查, 编制了适合中国文化背景的中学教师关系绩效评价量表。对173份有效问卷的探索性因素分析表明:中学教师关系绩效呈现清晰的四因素结构模型, 即职业道德、自我发展与创新、和谐互助和组织认同。为了进一步验证此模型是否是最优模型及中学教师关系绩效评价量表的信度和效度, 对413份有效问卷进行验证性因素分析, 结果证实了四维结构模型的合理性, 该量表具有较好的信度和效度。1) Borman, W.C., Molowidlo, S.J. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In: N Schmitt, W C. Borman (eds.). Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1993.71-982) 蔡永红:《教师职务绩效——结构及其影响因素研究》, 《北京师范大学博士论文》2002年。3) Van Scotter, J.R., Motowidlo S J. (1996). Interpersonal facilication and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81: 525-5314) Conway, J.M. (1999). Distingguishing contextual performance from task performance for manigerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 3-135) Johnson, J.W. (2001).The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimension to supervisor judgments of overall performance.Journal of Applied Psychological, 86: 984-9966) Coleman, V.I. (2000). Investigation of the underlying structure of the contextual performance domain. Dissertation Abstracts International:Section B: The Science and Engineering. 58 (8-B) : 44997) Farh, J.L. (1997). Impetus for action: a cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society Administrative.Science Quartly, 42: 421-4448) 唐守国、罗海涛:《公务员周边绩效相关因素分析》, 《辽宁工程技术大学学报》2007年第4期。9) 周智红、王二平:《人事心理学中的效标研究》, 《心理学动态》1999年第3期。10) Centra, J.A.Determining Faculty Effectiveness.San Francisco :Jossey - Bass, 197911) Frey, P.W., Leonard, D.W., Beatty W W. (1975).Student Ratings of Instruction:Validation Research. American Educational Research Journal, 12:327-33612) Warrington, A.G., Wong, P.T P. (1979).Effects of earned and assigned grades on student evaluations of an instructor. Journal of Educational psychology, 71:764-77513) 陈亮、杜欣:《高校教师周边绩效的探索性分析》, 《河北大学学报》2007年第4期。14) 王明辉:《企业员工组织社会化内容结构及其相关研究》, 《暨南大学博士学位论文》2006年。
-
表 1 中学教师关系绩效评价量表各个项目与相应维度总分之间的相关 (N=586)