超越传统：走向批判与本土化的比较教育学

杨明全

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2015.04.004

超越传统：走向批判与本土化的比较教育学

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2015.04.004

杨明全

北京师范大学国际与比较教育研究院，北京 100875

Marginson, S. & Mollis, M.(2000). “The Door Opens and the Tiger Leaps”: Theory and Method in Comparative Education in the Global Era. A paper for the Conference of the Comparative and International Education Society. 7-12.
OECD Development Center Working Paper (2000). Measuring Gender (In)Equality: Introducing the Gender, Institutions and Development Data Base. By Johannes P. Jütting, et al.No. 247. 6-8.
Giroux. H.(1983).Theories and Reproduction and Resistance in the New sociology of Education: a critical analysis. Harvard Education Review. 53(3): 261-281.
Noah, H. J. & Eckstein, M. A. (1969). Toward A Science of Comparative Education. London: Macmillan. 191.
Bradburn, N. M.(1990). A Framework and Principles for International Comparative Studies in Education. Washington: National Research Council Press. 12.
Paulston, R. (1993). Comparative Education as An Intellectual field: Mapping the Theoretical Landscape. Comparative Education, 23(2): 101-114.
Kazamias, A. M. & Massialas, B. G. (1965). Tradition and Change in Education: A comparative Study. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.2.
Rust, V. D. (1991). Postmodernism and its comparative education implications. Comparative Education Review, 35(4), 610-626.
Rust, V. D. (2004). Foreign influences in educational reform. In H. Ertl (Ed.), Cross-national attraction in education. Oxford: Symposium Books. 133.
Kandel, I. L. (1933). Comparative education. Boston: Houghton Miffl in Company. 24.
Walker Huntley.(2000). Beyond Racism: Embracing An Interdependent Future. The Southern Education Foundation. 1-6.
Liebman, M. & Paulston, R.(November 6, 1992). Mapping the Postmodern Turn in Comparative Education. Paper presented at the Comparative and International Education Society Northeast Regional Meeting. University of Pittsburgh. 2-3.
计量
- 文章访问数: 190
- HTML全文浏览量: 151
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 刊出日期: 2015-12-20

Beyond Tradition: Toward a Critical and Localized Comparative Education

YANG Mingquan

Institute of International and Comparative Education (ⅡCE), Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

摘要

摘要: 比较教育学即将迎来学科创立200周年。在经历了多次研究范式的转换之后，当代比较教育学呈现出新的发展趋势，即走向“批判”并回归“本土化”。伴随着传统的“描述与借鉴”范式的日趋式微，比较教育研究越来越受到社会批判理论和后现代主义理论的影响，由此带来了批判性的学术话语。在全球化时代，比较教育学的学科功能被重新定义，聚焦本土化问题成为新的取向，这意味着我们需要在“国际性”与“本土化”之间寻找新的融合点与平衡点。
- 比较教育学 /
- 批判取向 /
- 全球化 /
- 本土化
Abstract: As a discipline, comparative education (CE) will celebrate its 200^th anniversary. After several paradigm shifts, contemporary CE is demonstrating new development trends, i.e. towards criticism and localization. With the declining "description and borrowing" tradition, CE research is increasingly impacted by the critical theory and post-modern theory, which has resulted in diverse critical discourses in the field. In the era of globalization, the role of CE should be re-defined and focus on local concerns. Therefore, it's imperative that some new integration and balance between "internationalization" and "localization" should be explored.
- comparative education /
- critic-orientated /
- globalization /
- localization
注释:

1) Marginson, S. & Mollis, M.(2000). “The Door Opens and the Tiger Leaps”: Theory and Method in Comparative Education in the Global Era. A paper for the Conference of the Comparative and International Education Society. 7-12.

2) OECD Development Center Working Paper (2000). Measuring Gender (In)Equality: Introducing the Gender, Institutions and Development Data Base. By Johannes P. Jütting, et al.No. 247. 6-8.

3) Giroux. H.(1983).Theories and Reproduction and Resistance in the New sociology of Education: a critical analysis. Harvard Education Review. 53(3): 261-281.

4) Noah, H. J. & Eckstein, M. A. (1969). Toward A Science of Comparative Education. London: Macmillan. 191.

5) Bradburn, N. M.(1990). A Framework and Principles for International Comparative Studies in Education. Washington: National Research Council Press. 12.

6) Paulston, R. (1993). Comparative Education as An Intellectual field: Mapping the Theoretical Landscape. Comparative Education, 23(2): 101-114.

7) Kazamias, A. M. & Massialas, B. G. (1965). Tradition and Change in Education: A comparative Study. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.2.

8) Rust, V. D. (1991). Postmodernism and its comparative education implications. Comparative Education Review, 35(4), 610-626.

9) Rust, V. D. (2004). Foreign influences in educational reform. In H. Ertl (Ed.), Cross-national attraction in education. Oxford: Symposium Books. 133.

10) Kandel, I. L. (1933). Comparative education. Boston: Houghton Miffl in Company. 24.

11) Walker Huntley.(2000). Beyond Racism: Embracing An Interdependent Future. The Southern Education Foundation. 1-6.

12) Liebman, M. & Paulston, R.(November 6, 1992). Mapping the Postmodern Turn in Comparative Education. Paper presented at the Comparative and International Education Society Northeast Regional Meeting. University of Pittsburgh. 2-3.