Three Forms of Teaching Environment and their Values:Perspective of Process Philosophy
-
摘要: 本研究的目的是将过程哲学的思维方式运用于教学环境研究,探讨教学环境特殊的生存形态及其特征和价值。文章采取哲学省察方法,对现实教学生活中教学环境与作为主体的人所呈现的“二元对立”状态及其被规范和控制的事实进行深入分析。以怀特海过程哲学的过程-关系思维反思教学环境建构,师生的感官和身体,师师、师生及生生之间形成的“共同体”,以及围绕儿童生活和经验组织的“连续性课程知识”,构成教学环境的特殊形态。这种教学环境既是主体存在的,又是客体化的;既是稳定的,又是动态生成、能量流动的;既具有以自身整体性、独立性及内在和谐为旨归的主体道德关怀诉求,同时也具有使师生更具“创造性”、充满“关心”意味的客体价值。Abstract: Process philosophy is also known as a philosophy of organism or activity. It takes process and activity as the fundamental characteristics of organism, and holds the view that the whole world consists of the procedural and continually creative activity of organism. In recent years, the impact of process philosophy on education and teaching has become increasingly evident, and more and more researchers have applied the process thinking to the study of teaching process and the practical exploration of subject teaching. The purpose of this study is to apply the thinking of process philosophy to the research of teaching environment, and suggest the specific survival patterns of teaching environment and their characteristics and values. Adopting the method of philosophical introspection and the introspection of philosophy, this article argues that, in real teaching life, the relationship between teaching environment and individuals as the subject is in the state of dualism opposition, regulated and controlled. More attention has been paid to optimizing teaching environment to improve the teaching effectiveness from the technical level.By sorting and analyzing the literature about process philosophy and its thinking comprehensively, this study attempts to explore the three forms of teaching environment through process-related thinking of process philosophy. The first form is the sense and body of teacher and student.The second is the community formed between teacher and student or between student and student, such as the education community, teaching community, learning community and so on. The third is the continuity of curriculum knowledge around children's life and experience. These teaching environments are both subjective and objective. They are not just stable, but are generated dynamically and energy flowing. These environments have the subject appeal of a moral concern which aims at their own integrity, independence and internal harmony. Also, they have the object value which enables teacher and student to be more creative and caring. This will help promote teacher and student to learn to care and develop the qualities of caring, including caring about oneself, the community, nature and the knowledge. Constructing a teaching environment based on the theoretical process philosophy does not mean creating a material, solidified and tangible environment, but a transformation of concept and way of thinking. Instead of focusing on the effectiveness of teaching environment on teacher and student growth (just an instrumental value), this way of thinking focuses more on the inner good, external creativity and caring relationships in teaching environment. And it will make the teaching and education more and more human-centered, and furthermore, teaching life begins to walk out of the fence of the classroom and school and return to nature, society and ourselves.
-
Key words:
- sense and body /
- community /
- curriculum knowledge /
- process philosophy /
- teaching environment /
- values
-
[1] Barry J·Fraser.(1986). Classroom Environment.Groom Helm Ltd.21. http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses/2375/ [2] 陈怡.(2002).经验与民主-杜威政治学基础研究.上海:复旦大学出版社, 34-35. [3] Charles L. Silberman. (1973).Crisis in the Classroom. Wildwood House Ltd.7. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1317196?origin=crossref [4] David W Johnson, Roger T Johnson.(1991).Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning.New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 40. https://eduq.info/xmlui/handle/11515/4508 [5] Frederick G·Knirk.(1979).Designing Productive Learning Environments. Education Technology publications, Inc.36. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED438690 [6] 郭元祥.(2009).知识的教育学立场.教育研究与实验, (5), 1-6. http://www.cqvip.com/qk/91235X/200905/31946857.html [7] Gilles Deleuze. (1983). Nietzsche and Philosophy(Translated by Hugh Tomlinson). Columbia University Press. 23-24. 转引自王高德胜. (2013). 我们都是自己的陌生人-兼论教育与人的放逐与"归家". 高等教育研究, (2), 9-19. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HIGH201302005.htm [8] 海德格尔. (2002). 尼采(孙周兴译). 北京: 商务印书馆, 108. [9] 怀特海. (2003). 过程与实在(杨富斌译). 北京: 中国城市出版社, 202. [10] 韩立新.(2005).环境价值论.昆明:云南人民出版社, 76. [11] 霍尔姆斯·罗尔斯顿. (2000). 哲学走向荒野(刘耳等译). 长春: 吉林人民出版社, 9. [12] Lorin W·Anderson, Doris W·Ryan and Bernard J·Shapiro(ed.).(1989). the IEA Classroom Environment Study. Pergamum Press.67. [13] 怀特海. (1999). 怀特海文录(陈养正译). 杭州: 浙江文艺出版社, 313. [14] 麦克米伦·詹姆斯. (1989). 学生学习的社会心理学(何立婴译). 北京: 人民教育出版社, 142. [15] 孟建伟.(2013).教育与文化-关于文化教育的哲学思考.教育研究, (3), 4-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0845.2007.10.056 [16] 内尔·诺丁斯. (2003). 学会关心-教育的另一种模式(于天龙译). 北京: 教育科学出版社, 3, 85. [17] 齐格蒙特·鲍曼. (2003). 共同体(欧阳景根译). 南京: 江苏人民出版社, 序言5. [18] Sheralyn S·Gold Becker.(1976). Values Teaching. National Education Association of the United States.45. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2012.754005?tab=permissions [19] 田慧生.(1996).教学环境论.南昌:江西教育出版社, 7. [20] 汪民安, 陈永国.(2003).后身体:文化、权力和生命政治学.长春:吉林人民出版社, 324. [21] 小威廉姆E·多尔. (2000). 后现代课程观(王红宇译). 北京: 教育科学出版社, 5. [22] 约翰·杜威. (2001). 民主主义与教育(王承绪译). 北京: 人民教育出版社, 17, 24. [23] 约翰·科布. (2011). 过程教育(马晓梅译). 湛江师范学院学报, (2), 20-25. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJSX201105006.htm [24] 叶秀山.(1995).何谓"人诗意地居住在大地上".读书, (10), 44-49. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DSZZ199510010.htm [25] 佐藤学. (2003). 课程与教师(钟启泉译). 北京: 教育科学出版社, 83. [26] 赵汀阳.(2001).长话短说.北京:东方出版社, 189. [27] 赵鹤龄.(2010).当代过程哲学与中国教育思想及其实践研究-三种哲学观下的课程与教学.湖南第一师范学院学报, (4), 1-8. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/86980A/201004/35032839.html [28] 治河, 樊美筠.(2011).第二次启蒙.北京:北京大学出版社, 443.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 210
- HTML全文浏览量: 243
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0