The Synergy of Educational Administrative Law Enforcement:Patterns, Limitations and Strategies:——a Case of Recent Reform Initiatives
-
摘要: 当前,加强教育行政执法的协同性,已成为教育行政执法体制改革的重要工作方向,对于加快建立权责统一、权威高效的教育行政执法体制,破解当前教育行政执法领域面临的突出问题具有十分重要的意义。对教育行政执法体制改革试点工作的案例进行分析研究,可从教育行政部门内协同和跨部门协同两个层面,归纳出当前提高教育行政执法协同性的实践模式。教育行政部门内协同中存在着人员编制受限、职权配置不清、法律制度障碍、同级区域协同不足等问题;跨部门协同中存在着政府部门间协同程度不高、与第三方力量的协同程度不高、执法重心下沉尚不彻底等问题。未来可从加强顶层设计与制度供给、合理划分职权范围、推进教育督导与教育执法的结合、探索建立教育领域跨部门综合执法机制、充分发挥基层街镇组织的作用、加强与第三方力量的协同六个方面加强教育行政执法协同性。Abstract: The relationship between education and politics, economy, science and technology is complex, supportive and restrictive. In the period of social transition, the transfer of the decentralized educational administrative law enforcement(EALE)not only makes the environment of EALE more complicated but also makes its agents more diversified. All this requires a highly coordinated mechanism. Thus, the ongoing reform of the system of EALE launched by Ministry of Education, China puts emphasis on enhancing the synergy of EALE and establishing an efficient EALE system. The policy documents state some strategies from the following aspects: distribution of administrative powers, arrangement of law enforcement agencies, and capacity-building of law enforcement. In order to improve the synergy of EALE, it is very essential to examine and analyze the existing patterns and its shortages. The synergy of EALE occurs at two levels: the inner synergy in the educational administrative system and the cross-sector synergy. The practice pattern of the inner synergy pays more attention to the hierarchical synergy and the synergy between the inner agencies; to the reform of inner comprehensive EALE; to the building of special functional offices and affiliated institutions; and to the administrative agency itself or the power delegated by the superior. However, there are some problems in the inner synergy, such as limited staffing, vague power allocation, legislation barriers, flawed cross-regional synergy. On the other hand, the practice pattern of the cross-sector synergy focuses on the reform of joint law enforcement and the synergy between different administrative departments. Also, there are some shortages in the cross-sector synergy, including insufficient synergy between different government departments, improper synergy between governments and non-government organizations, etc. In the future, it is imperative to improve the synergy of EALE from the following six aspects: reinforcing the top-level design and institutional supply, allocating powers rationally, combining EALE with education supervision, exploring the reform of cross-sector comprehensive administrative law enforcement, making the best of the local organizations and cooperating with non-government organizations.
-
Key words:
- educational administrative law enforcement (EALE) /
- synergy /
- reform /
- practice patterns
-
[1] 莫于川. (2006年10月1日). 采用柔性管理与构建和谐社会——透过城管执法争议案例看行政管理改革创新的方向. 中国改革报. 6. [2] 周继东.(2014).深化行政执法体制改革的几点思考.行政法学研究, (1), 14. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XZFX201401003.htm [3] 赵锋.(2012).浦东民非教育"托管"升级.上海教育, (25), 39. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHJZ201225019.htm [4] 各地探索教育督查制度和行政执法工作亮点. (2012). 上海教育新闻网. 2012年3月30日, 取自: http://www.shedunews.com/zixun/shanghai/zonghe/2012/03/30/7298.html. [5] 柴葳. (2015年3月8日). 教育执法体制不顺何谈依法治教. 中国教育报. 1. [6] 王敬波.(2015).相对集中行政处罚权改革研究.中国法学, (4), 156. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10186-1011231580.htm [7] 李军鹏.(2001).政府职能转变的新视角:决策与执行分开.新视野, (1), 41. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XISY200101012.htm [8] 石佑启, 黄学俊.(2008).中国部门行政职权相对集中初论.江苏行政学院学报, (1), 113. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSXZ200801019.htm [9] 蔡恒.(2004).我国行政执法组织创新与行政体制改革协同性研究——兼评农业行政综合执法组织的合理性和局限性.江苏社会科学, (3), 104. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHKX200403022.htm [10] 石佑启, 杨志坤.(2012).论部门行政职权相对集中.北京:人民出版社. [11] 朱迪·弗里曼. (2010). 合作治理与新行政法(毕洪海、陈标冲译). 北京: 商务印书馆. [12] 俞可平.(2001).作为一种新政治分析框架的治理和善治理论.新视野, (5), 36. [13] 戢浩飞.(2015).治理视角下行政执法方式变革研究.北京:中国政法大学出版社.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 214
- HTML全文浏览量: 146
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0