课堂视频分析:理论进路、方法与应用

郑太年; 仝玉婷

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.03.013

课堂视频分析:理论进路、方法与应用

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.03.013

华东师范大学教育学部国际与比较教育研究所暨学习科学研究中心, 上海 200062

基金项目:

2017年度上海市哲学社会科学规划教育学一般项目“近十年上海初中教学方式的变与不变——课堂视频分析法的研究” A1714

计量
- 文章访问数: 241
- HTML全文浏览量: 209
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 刊出日期: 2017-05-20

Classroom Video Analysis: Theoretical Approaches, Methods and Applications

Institute of International and Comparative Education, Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

摘要

摘要: 课堂视频分析为研究教学和学习过程及其近因提供了获取数据、提升研究实证性水平的新方法和新技术，目前已经广泛应用于课堂教学的国际比较、教学改进和学习环境设计、教学理论建构、教师教育等多个领域的研究，逐步形成了学科内容分析、文化历史活动理论分析、课堂谈话分析、会话分析、微观民族志分析、境脉分析、现象学分析等多种理论进路，分析单元包括问题点、教学场景、语句、话轮/会话、完整主题会话/片段、完整课堂等多个层面。
- 视频分析 /
- 教学研究 /
- 课堂视频
Abstract: Classroom video analysis provides a new tool and technique to collect data for the research on teaching and learning processes and their internal and proximal factors, thus contributing to improved empirical research in education. This kind of analysis has been widely applied in various researches on teaching practices and underlying laws, comparative studies of classroom teaching and learning, teaching improvement and learning environment design, construction of instructional theories and improvement of teaching education. Many theoretical approaches have been developed, among which are subject matter content approach, neo-Vygotskyan approach, classroom talk, conversational analysis, micro-ethnographic approach, context analysis and phenomenological analysis and the updated version of some of approaches. The unit of analysis in classroom involves problem focus, instant image or scene, utterance, move or conversation, episode, or the whole period/activity.
- video analysis /
- research on teaching and learning /
- classroom video

HTML全文

参考文献(23)

[1]	爱德华·威尔逊.(2016).知识大融通, 21世纪的科学与人文.北京:中信出版集团.
[2]	方海光, 高辰柱, 陈佳.(2012).改进型弗兰德斯互动分析系统及其应用.中国电化教育, (10), 109-113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9860.2012.10.022
[3]	Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2010). Measures of effective teaching (MET) project-Working with teachers to develop fair and reliable measures of effective teaching. Retrieved on Nov. 1, 2016 from http://k12education.gatesfoundation.org/teacher-supports/teacher-development/measuring-effective-teaching.
[4]	Brinkman, M. (2016). Phenomenological video-analysis in pedagogical settings. 第三届中德教学论对话工作坊, 华东师范大学, 2016年10月14日.
[5]	Brophy, J. (Ed.). (2004). Using video in teacher education. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
[6]	Clarke, D. et al. (Eds.). (2006). The Learner's Perspective Study (Series). Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.
[7]	Derry, S. (Ed.) (2007). Guidelines for video research in education: Recommendations from an expert panel. The Data Research and Development Center.
[8]	Derry, S. J., Pea, R., Barron, B., Engle, R., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., Hall, R., Koschmann, T., Lemke, J., Sherin, M., & Sherin, B.(2010) Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 151.
[9]	Erickson, F. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In: Green, J., Camilli, G., & Elmore, P. (Eds.). (2006).Complementary Methods for Research in Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
[10]	Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., & Derry, S. (2007). Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[11]	Goldman, R., Zahn, G., & Derry, S. Frontiers of digital video research in the learning sciences: Mapping the terrain. InSawyer, R. K. (2014). (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. (Second edition)(pp.213-232). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[12]	Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K. C., & Sherin, M. G. (2014). Describing levels and components of a math-talk learning community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(2). 82-116. http://mseg.wikispaces.com/file/view/hufferd-ackles2004.pdf/282647660/hufferd-ackles2004.pdf
[13]	Janik, T. & Seidel, Tina. (Eds.) (2009). The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom. Munster: Waxmann Publishing Co.
[14]	Jewitt, C. (2012). An introduction to using video for research. Retrieved on January 12, 2017, from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2259/4/NCRM_workingpaper_0312.pdf
[15]	Larusson, J. & White, B. (Eds.). (2014). Learning analytics: From research to practice. New York: Springer.
[16]	Liddicoat, A.(2007). An introduction to conversation analysis. London: YHT Ltd.
[17]	Nielsen, BL (2015). Pre-service teachers' meaning-making when collaboratively analyzing video from school practice for the bachelor project at college. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 341-357. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2014.983066
[18]	OECD (2013), Innovative Learning Environments, Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing, 17.
[19]	O'Halloran, K. L. (2004). Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic functional perspectives. London, New York: Continuum.
[20]	Royce, T. D., & Bowcher, W. L. (2007). New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[21]	Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2009). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the Classroom. New York: Free Press.
[22]	Ulewicz, M. & Beatty, A. (2001). The power of video technology in international and comparative research in education. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
[23]	Zhang, M., Lundeberg, M. Koehler, M. J., & Eberhardt, J. (2011). Understanding affordances and challenges of three types of video for teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 454-462. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.015