论波克维茨的“历史化”教育史学

李先军

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.04.010

论波克维茨的“历史化”教育史学

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.04.010

李先军

华中师范大学教育学院, 武汉 430079

基金项目:

华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目"自由探索" CCNU15A06089

计量
- 文章访问数: 212
- HTML全文浏览量: 185
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 刊出日期: 2017-07-20

Historicizing: Thomas Popkewitz's History of Education Research Methodology

LI Xianjun

School of Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

摘要

摘要: 美国著名教育学家波克维茨针对教育史研究中的历史主义、实证主义、档案迷信等倾向，从社会知识论的角度，提出了"历史化"教育史学思想。历史化教育史学认为：现实与历史是不可分离的，教育者对现实的理解，不能脱离历史文化传统；教育史研究关注的是现实问题的"当下历史"；教育发展的历史过程，交织着知识和权力的相互影响；教育史研究者，应成为批判的行动者；历史发展是非连续性的，教育史应研究历史的断裂。
- 波克维茨 /
- 历史化 /
- 教育史学方法论 /
- 社会知识论
Abstract: From the perspective of sociology of knowledge, Thomas Popkewitz, the famous American educator deconstructs historicism and positivism and blind faith to the archive in history of education. He puts forward his thought of historicizing in history of education research methodology. According to Thomas Popkewitz, while the present and history can't be separated, researchers should understand the present from cultural history and tradition. The researchers in history of education must do research into the practical problems of the present, and use methodology of the history of present. The process of history is interwoven with the influence of relationship between knowledge and power, so that the researcher should be a critical actor. The development of history is discontinuous, so historians must do research on the disruption of the historical change.
- Thomas Popkewitz /
- historicizing /
- history of education research methodology /
- sociology of knowledge

HTML全文

参考文献(14)

[1]	格奥尔格·伊格尔斯. (2006). 二十世纪的历史学: 从科学的客观性到后现代的挑战(何兆武译). 济南: 山东大学出版社.
[2]	克罗齐. (2005). 历史学的理论与历史(田时纲译). 北京: 中国社会科学出版社.
[3]	林丹、李先军.(2015).解构与重构:托马斯·波克维茨"社会知识论"的思想通道.比较教育研究, (2), 74-79+90. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJJY201502012.htm
[4]	马克·布洛赫. (1997). 历史学家的技艺(张和声、程郁译). 上海: 上海社会科学院出版社.
[5]	王京春.(2008).福柯心中的历史:一种非科学、非理性的历史哲学.高校理论战线, (4), 39-45. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXLL200804010.htm
[6]	张斌贤.(2012).教育史观:批判与重构.教育学报, (6), 3-13. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XKJY201206000.htm
[7]	赵婧.(2012)."碎片化"思维与教育研究——托马斯·波克维茨教授访谈录.全球教育展望, (10), 3-7. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WGJN201210002.htm
[8]	Popkewitz, T. S. (2010). 理性之理性: 世界主义及其对学校的治理(胡美馨、韩春燕, 吴宗杰译). 全球教育展望, (3), 3-12+18.
[9]	Popkewitz, T. S.(1983). Change and stability in schooling:The dual quality of educational reform. Geelong:Deakin University Press.
[10]	Popkewitz, T. S.(1987). The formation of school subjects and the political context of schooling. Popkewitz, T. S. (Editor).The formation of school subjects:The struggle for creating an American institution. New York:The Falmer Press.
[11]	Popkewitz, T. S.(1991). A political sociology of education reform:Power/knowledge in teaching, teacher education and research. New York:Teachers College Press.
[12]	Popkewitz, T. S.(2007). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform:Science, education, and making society by making the child. New York:Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
[13]	Popkewitz, T. S.(2012). Styles of reason and the historical object:(Re) visioning the history of education. Thomas S. Popkewitz, Editor. (Re) visioning the history of education:Transnational perspectives on the questions, methods and knowledge. New York:Palgrave.
[14]	Popkewitz, T. S.(2015). The sociology of knowledge and the sociology of education:Michel Foucault and critical traditon. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288668030_Popkewitz_The_sociology_of_knowledge_and_the_sociology_of_educationL_Focault_and_Critical_Traditions_Torres_book?enrichId=rgreq-a5c6d0d2-2b37-4ed6-8494-2941217c09b0&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzI4ODY2ODAzMDtBUzozMTIwMjQyNTk1OTYyODlAMTQ1MTQwMzc4ODcwOQ%3D%3D&el=1_x_2.