Textbook Use: The Interaction between Teacher and Textbook-Inquiry on Teachers' Use of Maths Textbooks in Chinese Mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan
-
摘要: 对于旨在真正发展学生核心素养的新课程改革来说，如何改变和处理教师与教科书之间僵化的、单向的“跟随”关系，从而回应和满足学生的个性化和多样化的学习需求，是亟需解决的重要挑战。本文依据教师对教科书的满意度和使用教科书的忠诚度来界定教师与教科书的基本互动关系，并据此对中国内地、香港和台湾三地1 279名数学教师进行问卷调查，发现三地数学教师与教科书之间呈现了三种典型的互动形态：内地教师即使发现教科书的内容不符课堂需求，也高度依赖教科书进行教学；香港教师认为教科书内容若不符课堂教学需求，就应该对其进行取舍、补充和调适；而台湾教师则认为，无需对教科书进行过多的加工处理，因为教科书的内容质素已令人满意。Abstract: While the new round of curriculum reform aims at the development of students' key competencies, the challenge is how to change teachers' rigidly unidirectional use of textbooks (following in most cases), so as to meet students' diversified and personalized learning needs. The inter-relationship between teachers and textbooks is defined based on two dimensions:teachers' satisfaction with textbook design and teachers' fidelity in textbook use. In this study, 1 279 mathematic teachers from Chinese mainland, Taiwan and Hong Kong SAR were surveyed to investigate teachers' general inter-relationship with textbooks. The results presented three patterns of relationship. For mainland teachers, even though the textbooks fail to meet students' learning needs, they still choose to follow the books. On the other hand, Hong Kong teachers choose to adapt, supplement or even reject textbook content to create their own teaching materials. Finally, Taiwan teachers are satisfied with the quality of their textbooks, therefore they feel there is no need to adjust the textbooks.
-
Key words:
- textbook use /
- teachers /
- curriculum implementation
-
表 1 教科书的例题和习题的使用率的三地对比
内地 台湾 香港 例题 习题 例题 习题 例题 习题 72.63% 64.90% 73.70% 72.00% 55.44% 73.30% 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 较为突出的教科书问题的三地对比
教科书的问题 内地 台湾 香港 经常 较多 经常 较多 经常 较多 不符合校情/我班程度 14.03% 17.61% 4.76% 15.08% 12.09% 31.87% 内容设计不足 9.04% 18.46% 3.97% 12.7% 2.2% 20.88% 不够生动 5.68% 8.65% 1.59% 6.35% 5.49% 21.98% 内容设计不当 2.92% 5.56% 0 1.59% 0 9.89% 教科书设计老旧 3.39% 6.12% 0 0.79% 0 7.69%
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 三地教师所采取的例题和习题的来源及比例
来源 内地 台湾 香港 例题 习题 例题 习题 例题 习题 其他教科书/参考书 48.56% 50.35% 39.84% 41.98% 37.25% 42.64% 公开试题 51.00% 50.36% 39.60% 37.82% 48.85% 46.04% 网上搜寻 33.41% 33.64% 29.70% 27.60% 24.12% 22.69% 自行拟定 34.41% 33.43% 47.95% 46.23% 44.23% 34.56%
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 孔凡哲, 史宁中.(2008).教师使用教科书的过程分析与水平测定.上海教育科研, (3), 4-9. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=sjyy200803006&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ [2] 蓝顺德. (2006). 教科书政策与制度. 台北: 五南图书有限公司. [3] 石鸥.(2007).最不该忽视的研究——关于教科书研究的几点思考.湖南师范大学教育科学学报, (5), 5-9. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=fljy200705000&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ [4] 张芬芬.(2015).台湾教科书研究:背景、概况与趋势.湖南师范大学教育科学学报, (2), 9-14. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=fljy201502003&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ [5] Ben-Peretz, M. (1990).The teacher-curriculum encounter:Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts.Albany:State University New York Press. [6] Brown, M. W. (2002). Teaching by design:Understanding the interactions between teacher practice and the design of curricular innovation. Unpublished doctoraldissertation, Evanston, IL.:Northwestern University. [7] Fullan, M.& Pomfret, A.(1977) Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47(2), 335-397. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1170134 [8] Gehrke, N. J., Knapp, M.S.& Sirotnik, K.A.(1992).In search of the school curriculum. Review of Research in Education, 18, 51-110. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1167297 [9] Goodlad, J.I.(1979). Curriculum inquiry:The study of curriculum practice. New York:McGraw-Hill Book Company. [10] National Research Council.(2004).On evaluating curricular effectiveness:Judging the quality of K-12 mathematics evaluations. Washington D.C.:The National Academies Press. [11] Remillard, J. T., Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., & Lloyd, G. M.(2009).Mathematics teachers at work:Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction.New York:Routledge. [12] Remillard, J. T.(2005) Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3516049 [13] Remillard, J. T, Harris, B & Agodini, R.(2014) The influence of curriculum material design on opportunities for student learning.ZDM, 46(5), 735-749. doi: 10.1007/s11858-014-0585-z [14] Stodolsky, S.& Grossman, P.(2000) Changing students, changing teaching. The Teachers College Record, 102(1), 125-172. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ605843 -
点击查看大图
图(4) / 表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 288
- HTML全文浏览量: 172
- PDF下载量: 355
- 被引次数: 0