中国人文社会科学核心期刊

中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊

中文核心期刊

Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 18 Issue 4
Jan.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2000.04.004
  • Received Date: 1999-11-19
  • Publish Date: 2021-01-26
  • loading
  • [1]
    T. Aspland, Ⅰ. Macpherson, C. Proudford, & L. Whitmore(1996). Critical Collaborative Action Research as A Means ofCuriculum Inquiry and Empowerment. Educational Action Research, 4(1), PP.93-104.
    [2]
    T. Bottomore(1984). The Frankfunt School. Chichester : Ellis Horwood Itd.
    [3]
    J. Braaten(1991). Habermas's Critical Theory of Society. New York: State University of New York.
    [4]
    W. Carr, & S. Kemmis(1986). Becorming Crical : Education, Knowuldege and Action Research. London: Falmer Press.
    [5]
    w. Carr(1995). For Education : Torards Critical Educational Inquiry. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    [6]
    J. Elliott(1991). Acion Research for Educational Change. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
    [7]
    Grundy(1982). Three Modes of Action Research. Curriculum Perspectives.2(2), pp.23 - 24.
    [8]
    S. Grundy(1987). Curiculum : Product or Praxis. London: The Falmer Press.
    [9]
    J. Habermas(1987). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity : Twelrve Lectures (F. Lawrence, Trans.)Cambridge: Polity Press. (Original work published 1986).
    [10]
    J. Habermas(1972). Knouldege and Hunan Interests(J. J. Shapiro, Trans). London: Heinemann. (original uwork pub-lished 1968).
    [11]
    D. C. Hoy(1978). The Critical Circle : Literature, History, and Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of Cal-iformia Press.
    [12]
    R. Keat(1981). The Politics of Social Theory : Habermas, Freud, and the Critique of Positiaism. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [13]
    S. Kemmis, & R. McTaggart(1988). The Action Research planner(3n ed.). Victoria: Deakin University.
    [14]
    W.S.Li, T.S.lam, W. M. Yu, & P.K. Fok(1998a). The End of Action Reseurch? The Case for Hong Kong. Paper pre-sented at the Intemnational Teacher Education Conference 1998(ITEC 98)in the Fast China Normnal University, Shanghai, China, Apil 26 - 30.
    [15]
    J. B. MacDonald(1975). Curriculum and Human Interests. In W Pinar(ed.), Curiculum Theorizing : The Reconceptualists. Berkeley : McCutchan Pubishing Corporation.
    [16]
    C.J. Marsh(1997). Key Concepts for Understanding Curiculumn : Volune 1. Loudon: The Falmer Press.
    [17]
    T. McCarthy(1978). The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge, Massachuet: MIT Press.
    [18]
    J. McKernan(1987). Action Research and Curiculum Development. Peabody Jounal of Education, 64(2), pp.6- 19.
    [19]
    J. McKernan(1989). Varieties of Curiculum Action Research: Constraints and Typologies in Anglo-Inish and American Projects. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA March 27-31, 1989.
    [20]
    J. Mckernan(1991). Action Inquiry : Sudied Enactment. In E. C. Short(ed.), Forms of Curiculuom Inquiry(pp.309 -326). New York: State Unvrsity of New York Press.
    [21]
    J. Mckernan(1996). Curiculum Action Research : A Handbook of Mehods and Resoures for the Refletive Pratitioner(2md ed.). London: Kogan Page.
    [22]
    J. McNiff(1988). Action Research : Principles and Practice. London: Macnillan.
    [23]
    R. McTaggart, & M. Carbutcheon Singh(1986). New Directiuns in Action Research. Gurriculum Perspectires, 6(2).42- 46.
    [24]
    S. E. Noffke, & M. Brennan(1991). Sudent Teachers Use Action Research: Issues and Examples. In B. R. Tabachnick, & K.M.Zeichner(eds.), lssues and Practices in Inquiry-0riened Teacher Education(pp. 186 - 201). London: The FalmerPress.
    [25]
    P. Ricoeur(1991). From Text to Action: Essays in Herneneutics Ⅱ. UK : Athlone Press.
    [26]
    G. Ritzer(1996). Classical Sociological Theory(2nd ed.). New York: The McGraw Hill International Editions.
    [27]
    W. H. Schubert(1986). Curriculum : Perspective, Paradigm, and Pssibility. New York: Macmillan.
    [28]
    J. Schwab(1969).The practical: A language for Curiculum. School Review, 78, pp.1-23.
    [29]
    J. Schwab(1971). The Practical: Arts of Eelectie.School Rerierv, 79(4), pp.493 - 542.
    [30]
    J. Schwab(1973). The Practical 3: Translation into Curriculum. School Rerier, 81(4), pp. 501-522.
    [31]
    J. Schwab(1983). The Practical 4: Somehing for Cumiculum Profesors to Do. Curiculum Inquiry, 13(3), pp.239-265.
    [32]
    L. Stenhouse(1975). An Introduction to Curiculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann.
    [33]
    J. B.Thompson, D. Held, (ed.)(1982). Habermas, Critical Debates. London: Macmillan.
    [34]
    D. H. Tripp(1987). Action Research and Pofessional Development. ln P. Hughes, (ed.), Better Teachers for Better Schools. Melbourme: Australian College of Education.
    [35]
    A. Wellmer (1985). Reason, Utopia, and the Dialectic of Enlightenment. In R. J. Bermstein, (ed.), Habermas and Modermity(pp.35 - 66). Masachusels: The MIT Press.
    [36]
    O.Zuber-Skerritt(1996a). Introduction: New Directions in Action Rescarch. In O. Zuber Skeritt, (ed.), New Drections in Action Research(pp.3 - 9)London: The Falmer Press.
    [37]
    O.Zuber-Skerritt(1996b). Enancipatory Action Ressearch for Organisational Change and Managenent Development.In O.Zuber Skenitt, (ed.), New Directions in Action Research (pp.83-105).London: The Falmer Press.
    [38]
    余灵灵: 《哈伯玛斯传》, 河北人民出版社, 1998.
    [39]
    李子建: 《环境教育的取向: 课程范式之观点》, 《初等教育学报》1993年第1期.
    [40]
    李子建: 《从批判角度剖析课程定义》, 《教育学报》1996年第1期.
    [41]
    李子建、黄显华: 《课程: 范式、取向和设计》(第二版), 香港中文大学出版社, 1996年.
    [42]
    李英明: 《哈伯马斯》, 台北东大图书公司, 1986年.
    [43]
    周华山: 《试论当代社会学理论》, 李明堑(编)《社会学新论》香港: 商务印书馆, 1992年.
    [44]
    金耀基: 《范典与社会学之发展》, 李明堑(编)《社会学新论》香港: 商务印书馆, 1992年.
    [45]
    高宣扬: 《哈伯玛斯论》, 台北远流出版公司, 1991年.
    [46]
    高慎英: 《教师成为研究: "教师专业化"问题探讨》, 《教育理论与实践》1998年第3期.
    [47]
    郭官义、李黎: 《译者前言》, 哈伯玛斯著.《认识与兴趣》上海学林出版社, 1999年.
    [48]
    陈向明: 《甚么是行动研究》, 《教育研究与实验》1999年第2期.
    [49]
    陈伯璋: 《课程研究与教育革新》, 台北师大书苑, 1987年.
    [50]
    陈美如: 《跃登教师研究的舞台: 教师课程行动研究初探》, 《人文及社会学会科教学通讯》1996年第1期.
    [51]
    陈惠邦: 《教育行动研究》, 台北师大书苑, 1998年.
    [52]
    曾庆豹: 《当代西方著名哲学家评传: 社会哲学》, 山东人民出版社, 1996年.
    [53]
    黄政杰: 《课程改革》(二版), 台北汉文, 1992年.
    [54]
    黄瑞祺: 《批判社会学: 批判理论与现代社会学》, 台北三民书局, 1996年.
    [55]
    杨深坑: 《教育知识的国际化或本土化?一兼论台湾近年来的教育研究》.《教育学报》1996年第1期.
    [56]
    欧力同: 《哈贝马斯的批判理论》重庆出版社, 1997年.
    [57]
    欧用生: 《教师专业成长》, 台北师大书苑有限公司, 1996年.
    [58]
    蔡清田: (行动研究理论与"教师即研究者"取向的课程发展》, 载台东师院国民教育研究所(编)《行动研究国际学术研讨会论文集》, 1998年.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(3)

    Article views (156) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return