中国人文社会科学核心期刊

中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊

中文核心期刊

Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 21 Issue 1
Jan.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2003.01.004
  • Received Date: 2002-12-01
  • Publish Date: 2003-03-01
  • loading
  • [1]
    郝德永.课程研究方法论[M].北京: 教育科学出版社, 2001.
    [2]
    黄显华.课程论知识体系的构建与课程研究方法论的转型[A].载黄显华、征秉坤, 寻找课程论与教科书设计的理论基础[M].北京: 人民教育出版社, 2002.
    [3]
    黄政杰.多元社会课程取向[M].台北: 师大书苑, 1995.
    [4]
    黄甫全.大课程论初探一兼论课程(论)与教学(论)的关系[J].课程.教材.教法, 2000(5).
    [5]
    靳玉乐.课程实施: 现状、问题与展望[j]山东教育科研, 2001(11).
    [6]
    刘放桐.新编现代西方哲学[M].北京: 人民出版社, 2000.
    [7]
    李子建、黄显华.课程: 范式、取向与设计[M].香港: 中文大学出版社, 1996.
    [8]
    李子建.从批判角度剖析课程定义[J].教育学报, 1996(1).
    [9]
    陆有铨.躁动的百年一20世纪的教育历程[M].济南: 山东教育出版社, 1997.
    [10]
    张华.论课程实施的涵义与基本取向[J].外国教育资料, 1999(2).
    [11]
    张华.走向课程理解: 西方课程理论的新进展[].全球教育展望, 2001(7).
    [12]
    张华、石伟平、马庆发(2000).课程流派研究[M].济南: 山东教育出版社, 2000.
    [13]
    张文军.后现代教育[M].台湾: 扬智文化事业有限公司, 1998.
    [14]
    甄晓兰.(1999).《知识论之辩证对课程发展的影响》.载《上海教育科研》, 199年第2期.
    [美]罗蒂、(1992).(后哲学文化》.上海: 上海译文出版社.
    [美]多尔著, 王红宇译.(2000).后现代课程观[M].北京: 教育科学出版社, 2000.
    [美]多尔著, 王红宇译.后现代思想与后现代课程观[J].全球教育展望, 2001(2).
    [类]拉尔夫.泰勒著, 施良方译.课程与教学的基本原理[M].北京: 人民教育出版社, 1994.
    [英]丹尼斯.劳頓著, 张渭城译, 课程研究领域的理论与实践.北京: 人民教育出版社, 1985.
    [德]道格拉斯.凯尔纳、斯蒂文.贝斯特著, 张志斌译.后现代理论——批判性的质疑[M].北京; 中央编译出版杜, 1999.
    [美]大卫.雷.格里芬著, 马季方译.后现代科学——科学魅力的再现[M].北京: 中央编译出版社, 1998.
    [22]
    让.弗朗索瓦利奥塔尔著, 车槿山泽, 后现代状态: 关于知识的报告[M].北京: 生活.读书.新知三联书店, 1997.
    [23]
    Aronowitz, S. & Giroux, H.(1991).Pastmodem Education: politics, culture, and social criticism.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [24]
    Behar, L.S.(1994).The Knowledge Base of Curriculum: a empirical analysis. Maryland: University Press of America, Inc.
    [25]
    Berman, P.(1981).Educational Change: an implementation paradigm.In Lehnming, R.SKane, M.(ed.)Improving Schools; using what we know.California: Sage, Beverly Hills.
    [26]
    Connely, F.M. & Lantz, 0.C.(1991).Definitions of Curriculum: an introduction.InLewy, A.(ed.).The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum.Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    [27]
    Donmoyer, R.SKos, R(1993).At-risks Students: insight from/about research.In Donmoyer, R.SKos, R(ed, ).Al-risks Students: portraits, policies, program and practice.Albany: SUNY Press.
    [28]
    Fullan, M.(1982).The Meaning of Educational Change.Toronto: Ontario Institute for the Study of Education.
    [29]
    Fullan, M.(1991).Curriculum Implementation.In Lewy, A.(ed.).The International Encyclopedia of Cunriculum.Oxford: pergamon press
    [30]
    Fullan, M. (1993). Change Forces: probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer Press.
    [31]
    Fullan, M. & Pornfret, A. (1997). "Research on Curriculum and Instruction implementation. "Review of Educational Research.
    [32]
    Goodlad, J.I.(1979).The Scope of the Curriculum Field.In Goodlad, J.I.(ed.).Curriculum Inquiry: the study of curriculum practice, NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
    [33]
    Goodlad, J.I.(1991).Curriculum as a Field of Study.In Lewy, A..(ed.).The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum Oxford; Pergamon Press.
    [34]
    Hall, G. & Hord, S, M.(1987).Changes in Schools: facilitating the process.Albany: SNUY Press.
    [35]
    Loucks, S.F.(1991).Curriculum Adoption.In lewy, A..(ed.).The Intermational Encyclopedia of Curriculum.Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    [36]
    Mclaughlin, M.W.(1976), Implementation as Mutual Adaptation: change in classroom organization.Teachers College Record.Vol, 77, No.3, pp.339-351.
    [37]
    McNeil, J. D. (1996). Curriculum: a comprehensive introduction(5th ed.). New York: Harper Collins College.
    [38]
    McNeil, J. D. (1999). Curriculum: the teacher's initiative (2nd ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    [39]
    Neuman, W. L. (1994). Social Research Methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. (2nd ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    [40]
    Ornstein, A.C. & Hunkins.F.P.(1988).Curriculum: foundations, principles, and issues.New Jersey, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall,
    [41]
    Doll, R.C.(1996).Curriculum Improvement: decision making and process(9th ed.).Boston: Allyn&Bacon.
    [42]
    Saylor, J.G., Alexander, W.M.SLewis, A.J.(1981).Curriculum Planning for Better Teaching and Learning(4th ed.), Tokyo: Holt-Saunders International Editious.
    [43]
    Schubert, W.H.(1986).Curriculum: perspective, paradigm and possibility.NewYork: Macmillan Pub.Co.
    [44]
    Short, E. C. (1991). Introduction: understanding curriculum inquiry. In Short, E. C. (ed.), Forms of Curriculum Inquiry.Albany: SUNY Press.
    [45]
    Slattery, P. (1995). Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era. New York: Garland Pub. Co
    [46]
    Smith, D. L. & Lovat, T. L. (1990). Curriculum: action and reflection. Australia: Social Science Press.
    [47]
    Snyder, J., Bolin, F. & Zurnwalt, K. (1992). Curriculum Implementation. In Jackson, P. W. (ed.). Handbook of Research on Curriculum. New York: Macmillan Pub. Co.
    [48]
    Tanner, D. &Tanner, L. (1975). Curriculum Development: theory into Practice. New York: Macmillan Pub. Co.
    [49]
    Vandenberg, D. (1987). Interpretive, Normative Theory of Education. Education Philosophy and Theory. Vol, 19, No. 1.
    [50]
    Wraga, W. G. (1996). Toward a Curriculum Theory for the New Century: essay review of Patrick Slattery, Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era. Journal of Curriculum Studies. Vol. 28, No. 4.
    [51]
    Zais, R. S. (1996). Curriculum: principles and foundations. New York: Haper Collins Publishers.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(1)

    Article views (191) PDF downloads(8) Cited by()
    Proportional views

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return