doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2007.02.011

Volume 25 Issue 2

Jun. 2007

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences) > 2007 > 25(2): 59-64,86

PDF( 77 KB)

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2007.02.011

Received Date: 2007-01-01
Publish Date: 2007-06-01

Abstract

FullText(HTML)

References(26)

References

[1]	Driver, R.Newton, P.Osborne, J.(2002).Estab-lishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms.S cience Education, 84: 287 -312.
[2]	Kolst, S.D.(2001a)Scientific literacy for citizen-ship : tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues.Science Education, 85 : 291 -310.
[3]	Zeidler, D.L.(1984).Moral issues and social policy in science education : closing the literacy gap.Science Education, 68 : 411 -419.
[4]	Kuhn, D.(1993).Science as argument : implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77 : 319-337.
[5]	Sadler, T.D, Zeidler, D.L.(2004).Patten of infor-mal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision -making.Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Nashville.
[6]	Perkins, D.N.(1985).Post -primary education has little impact upon informal reasoning.Journal of Educational Psy-chology, 77 : 562 -571.
[7]	Kuhn, D.(1993).Science as argument : implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77 : 319-337.
[8]	Zohar, A, Nemet, F.(2002).Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human ge-netics.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39: 35 -62.
[9]	Patronis, T, Potari, D, Spiliotopoulou, V.(1999). Students' arugumentation in decision-making on a socio -scien-tific issue : implications for teaching.International Journal of Sci-ence Education, 21 : 745-754.
[10]	Aikenhead, G. (2004).What is STS in science teaching?.In : D.L.Zeidler, T D.Sadler Beyond STS : A re-search-based framework for socioscientific issues education.An-nual Meeting of the National Association for Research in S cience Teaching, Vancouver.
[11]	Geddis, A.N.(1991).Improving the quality of sci-ence classroom discourse on controversial issues.Science Educa-tion, 75 (2): 169 -183.
[12]	Zeidler, D.L, Walker, K.A, Ackett, W.A, et al. (2002).Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas.Science Education, 86 (3): 343 -367.
[13]	Sadler, T.D, Chambers, F.W, Zeidler, D.L. (2004).Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in re-sponse to a socioscientific issue.International Journal of Science E-ducation, 26 : 387 -409.
[14]	Voss, J.F, Blais, J.Means, M.L.(1986).Infor-mal reasoning and subject matter know ledge in the solving of eco-nomics problems by na? ve and novice individuals.Cognition and Instruction, 3 (4): 269 -302.
[15]	Kolst, S.D.(2001b).' To trust or not to trust, ...' —pupils' ways of judging information encountered in a so-cioscientific issue [J].International Journal of Science Educa-tion, 23 : 877 -901.
[16]	Sadler, T.D, Chambers, F.W, Zeidler, D.L. (2002).Investigating the crossroads of the nature of science, so-cioscientific issues, and critical thinking.Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Or-leans.
[17]	Pedretti, E.(1999).Decision making and STS edu-cation : exploring scientific knowledge and social responsibility in schools and science centers through an issues -based approach. School.Science and Mathematics, 99 : 174 -181.
[18]	Zohar, A.Weinberger, Y.Tamir, P. (1994).The effect of the biology critical thinking project on the development of critical thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31 (2): 183 -196.
[19]	Gelder, T.V.(2000).Learning to reason : a rea-son! albe approach.the Fifth Australasian Cognitive Science Soci-ety Conference, Adelaide.
[20]	Sadler, T.D.(2004).Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues : a critical review of research.Journal of Re-search in Science teaching, 41 (5): 513 -536.
[21]	Simonneaux, L.(2001).Role-play or debate to pro-mote students' argumentation and justificationon an issue in animal transgenesis.International Journal of Science Education, 23 : 903 -927.
[22]	Hogan, K.(2002).Small groups' ecological reason- ing while making an environmental managementdecision.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 : 341-368.
[23]	Sadler, T.D, Zeidler, D.L.(2005).The signifi-cance of content know ledge for informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues : applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues.S cience Education, 89 (1): 71 -93
[24]	Walker, K.A, Zeidler, D.L.(2003).Students'understanding of the nature of science and their reasoning on socio-scientific issues : A Web -based learning inquiry.Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.
[25]	Pedretti, E.(2003).Teaching science, technology, society and environment (STSE)education : preservice teachers' philosophical and pedagogical landscapes. In : D.L.Zeidler The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues anddiscourse in sci-ence education.Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press, 219-240.
[26]	Keefer, M.W.(2003).Moral reasoning and case - based approaches to ethical instruction in science. In : D. L.Zeidler The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse inscience education. Netherlands : Kluwer Academic.Press, 241 -260.