中国人文社会科学核心期刊

中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊

中文核心期刊

Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 34 Issue 2
Jul.  2016
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Gengli. From Possession to Generation: Transforming the Concept and Practice of Child Learning[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2016, 34(2): 76-81. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2016.02.010
Citation: ZHANG Gengli. From Possession to Generation: Transforming the Concept and Practice of Child Learning[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2016, 34(2): 76-81. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2016.02.010

From Possession to Generation: Transforming the Concept and Practice of Child Learning

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2016.02.010
  • Publish Date: 2016-05-20
  • It seems widely recognized that a child should be engaged in learning, and that his future happiness and accomplishments rely on his learning outcomes. Increasingly, child learning has attracted people's great attention. However, there are different points of view of the child, child development and happiness, leading to different concepts of learning closely related to child development and happiness. These learning concepts each have their own epistemological basis with their own characteristics, and have exerted influence on people's educational ideas and practices to varying degrees. Therefore, in promoting education reforms, it is very important to understand the child, clarify child learning and transform the educational concepts. The idea that learning is possession is a concept of child learning in the context of modern utilitarian society. Under the framework of the adult-child binary comparison, this concept is built on "scarcity", and it takes utilitarian happiness as the purpose, possession as the means and efficiency as the standard. This kind of learning concept has its defects due to its specific conceptual basis and values. In particular, the concept inverts the relationship between a child's life and his learning, ignores a child's active endogenous learning power, and separates the process of happiness from the results of happiness in child learning, and the holistic state of learning disappears.In fact, a child is neither inherently fixed nor a passive existence, but a generative human being who has great potential of development beyond the framework of adult-children binary comparison. Besides, generation and development are the inherent characteristics of a child's life process when regarded as a human being. The idea that learning is generation implies the process of a child's self-generation and self-creation. In this process, a child actively draws on his life experience based on his own needs and interests, and employs his psychological absorbability to interact with the environment frequently.As child learning is a generative development arising from his natural rhythm, it is of survival value. Specifically speaking, generative child learning is not a passive mechanical process driven by external forces, but a creative life process following the principle of genuine interest with a lot of positive experience. Generative child learning is different from that of external input, which is based on the objectivist empiricism. It emphasizes learning subjectivity and autonomy, which is based on direct experience. In addition, it attaches great importance to the unique value of a child's life and games in the process of his generation and development. Generative child learning is holistic. In the process, a child is ready to open himself, excited to embrace the whole world, and active in interacting with the environment in an integrated way. In the generative learning, a child experiences the unified happiness of the results and processes. Furthermore, based on the characteristics of a child's life, this generative learning has its own internal definition that constitutes the basic conditions for the realization of the generative learning. In other words, while immaturity is the primary condition for generative child learning, internal time is the basic scale and freedom is the basic requirement.
  • loading
  • [1]
    埃里希·弗洛姆. (1988). 占有还是生存(关山译). 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店. 8, 2. http://xuewen.cnki.net/R2007060480003048.html
    [2]
    Chris Jenks.(2005). Childhood (2nd edition).Abingdon, Oxon; Routledge.8.
    [3]
    杜威. (2005). 经验与教育(第2版)(姜文闵译). 北京: 人民教育出版社. 266.
    [4]
    杜威.(2008).杜威教育文集(第1卷)(吕达等主编).北京:人民教育出版社. 165-166, 116, 167, 209, 110.
    [5]
    杜威. (2005). 我们怎样思维·经验与教育(姜文闵译). 北京: 人民教育出版社. 226.
    [6]
    杜威. (2001). 民主主义与教育(王承绪译). 北京: 人民教育出版社. 49-50, 50.
    [7]
    杜威. (2005). 学校与社会·明日之学校(第2版)(赵祥麟等译). 北京: 人民教育出版社. 118.
    [8]
    赫舍尔. (1994). 人是谁(隗仁莲译). 贵阳: 贵州人民出版社. 46.
    [9]
    蒙台梭利. (2002). 吸收性心智(北京儿童之家教育研究中心编译). 兰州: 兰州大学出版社. 34, 9, 109.
    [10]
    佩里·诺德曼、梅维丝·雷默. (2008). 儿童文学的乐趣(陈中美译). 上海: 少年儿童出版社. 136.
    [11]
    涂艳国.(1997).试论"人的自由发展"的涵义.华中师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 3, 70. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Thesis/Y1287202
    [12]
    王啸.(2003).教育人学-当代教育学的人学路向.南京:江苏教育出版社.43.
    [13]
    王理平.(2007).差异与绵延-柏格森哲学及其当代命运.北京:人民出版社.400.
    [14]
    杨宁.(2003).儿童是人类之父-从进化心理学看人类个体童年期的本质.华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 5, 110-111. http://www.doc88.com/p-687406862575.html
    [15]
    赵汀阳.(2010).论可能生活(第2版).北京:中国人民大学出版社.142, 145.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views (193) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return