Some Ideas about Constructing Educational Hominology

FENG Jianjun

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.02.007

Volume 35 Issue 2

Mar. 2017

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences) > 2017 > 35(2): 57-67, 120

FENG Jianjun. Some Ideas about Constructing Educational Hominology[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2017, 35(2): 57-67, 120. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.02.007

Citation:

FENG Jianjun. Some Ideas about Constructing Educational Hominology[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2017, 35(2): 57-67, 120. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.02.007

Citation:

PDF( 0 KB)

Some Ideas about Constructing Educational Hominology

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.02.007

FENG Jianjun

Institute of Moral Education, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China

Publish Date: 2017-04-20

Abstract

Abstract

It's generally accepted that philosophy is the essence of the spirit of the era, and educational hominology is the educational philosophy in the new era of student-oriented development. Educational hominology, an interdisciplinary subject integrating humanology and pedagogy, is the application of humanology in education as well as a humanistic reflection on education. It involves research on whole person in education, discussing the relationship between whole person and education and his/her development. While hominology is a philosophy concerning the study of whole person, its nature, existence, and fundamental issue of development, educational hominology is a contemporary educational philosophy, which focuses on educational philosophy involving many different subjects. In terms of hominology, educational hominology is an applied subject; in terms of education, educational hominology is a basic subject of methodology.The study of educational hominology and its orientation determine the nature of educational hominology, including the nature of philosophy, being comprehensive, contemporary, and fundamental. In other words, in educational hominology, research is focused on whole person and his/her education, exploring the historical, philosophical, and realistic development of educational hominology, plus its theory of ontology, value and practice. In educational hominology, research is designed to understand human's life by exploring the meaning of life, rather than treating humans as research objects. The research method of educational hominology aims to know people, understand people, and care for people in the context of education. Therefore, in nature, educational hominology is a normative research, guided by practical materialism, using dialectical thoughts and comprehensive methods, offering a picture of whole person in education.
- hominology,
- educational hominology,
- subjects

FullText(HTML)

References(29)

References

[1]	埃德加·莫兰. (1999). 迷失的范式: 人性研究(陈一壮译). 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[2]	布列钦卡. (2006). 教育知识的哲学(杨明全, 宋时春译). 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
[3]	博尔诺夫. (1999). 教育人类学(李其龙译). 上海: 华东师范大学出版社. .
[4]	陈志尚.(2005).人学原理.北京:北京出版社.
[5]	冯建军.(2006).教育学的生命立场.教育研究, (3), 29-34. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYYJ200603002.htm
[6]	冯建军.(2009).向着人的解放迈进——改革开放30年我国教育价值取向的回顾.高等教育研究, (1), 17-25. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HIGH200901003.htm
[7]	冯增俊.(2005).教育人类学教程.北京:人民教育出版社.
[8]	高清海, 孟宪忠. (1988). 从人的研究到人学. 人民日报, 06-06.
[9]	高清海, 孟宪忠.(1988).人学论纲.哲学动态, (6), 49-50.
[10]	高清海, 等.(1998).人的"类生命"与"类哲学".长春:吉林人民出版社.
[11]	顾明远.(1998).教育大辞典.上海:上海教育出版社.
[12]	黄楠森, 韩庆祥.(1989).关于建构人学的几点设想, 社会科学战线, (3), 62-69. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHZX198903010.htm
[13]	黄楠森, 夏甄陶, 陈志尚主编. (1990). 人学词典. 北京: 中国国际广播出版社.
[14]	黄楠森.(1996).人学:作为整体的人及其一般规律的科学.学术月刊, (4), 12-13. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XSYK199604005.htm
[15]	扈中平, 蔡春.(2003).教育人学论纲.华东师范大学学报 (教育科学版), (3), 1-9. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDXK200303000.htm
[16]	韩庆祥 (2000).世纪之交的中国人学思潮.上海社会科学院学术季刊, (1), 145-152. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHJK200001017.htm
[17]	韩庆祥, 邹诗鹏.(2001).人学——人的问题的当代阐释.昆明:云南人民出版社.
[18]	康德. (2005). 论教育学(赵鹏, 何兆武译). 上海: 上海人民出版社.
[19]	刘铁芳.(2003).教育学何以作为人文之学.天津教科院学报, (1), 7-9. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJJK200301001.htm
[20]	马克思, 恩格斯.(1956).马克思恩格斯全集 (第1卷).北京:人民出版社.
[21]	马克思, 恩格斯.(1995).马克思恩格斯选集 (第1卷).北京:人民出版社.
[22]	马克思, 恩格斯.(1957).马克思恩格斯全集 (第2卷).北京:人民出版社.
[23]	马克思, 恩格斯.(1995).马克思恩格斯选集 (第2卷).北京:人民出版社.
[24]	陶富源.(2003).哲学、人学与人.哲学研究, (11), 19-24.
[25]	王啸.(2006).教育人学内涵探析.华东师范大学学报 (教育科学版), (1), 23-29. http://xbjk.ecnu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract8368.shtml
[26]	王洪才.(2012).教育学:人文科学抑或社会科学?教育研究, (4), 10-17. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYYJ201204003.htm
[27]	熊庆年 (2011).教育学是人学.复旦教育论坛, (1), 1. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GWZX201101002.htm
[28]	叶澜.(2006).教育概论 (修订版).北京:人民教育出版社.
[29]	张楚廷 (2011).教育学属于人文科学.教育研究, (8), 3-8. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYYJ201108004.htm