中国人文社会科学核心期刊

中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊

中文核心期刊

Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 35 Issue 4
Jul.  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Xianjun. Historicizing: Thomas Popkewitz's History of Education Research Methodology[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2017, 35(4): 99-106, 137, 138. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.04.010
Citation: LI Xianjun. Historicizing: Thomas Popkewitz's History of Education Research Methodology[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2017, 35(4): 99-106, 137, 138. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.04.010

Historicizing: Thomas Popkewitz's History of Education Research Methodology

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.04.010
  • Publish Date: 2017-07-20
  • From the perspective of sociology of knowledge, Thomas Popkewitz, the famous American educator deconstructs historicism and positivism and blind faith to the archive in history of education. He puts forward his thought of historicizing in history of education research methodology. According to Thomas Popkewitz, while the present and history can't be separated, researchers should understand the present from cultural history and tradition. The researchers in history of education must do research into the practical problems of the present, and use methodology of the history of present. The process of history is interwoven with the influence of relationship between knowledge and power, so that the researcher should be a critical actor. The development of history is discontinuous, so historians must do research on the disruption of the historical change.
  • loading
  • [1]
    格奥尔格·伊格尔斯. (2006). 二十世纪的历史学: 从科学的客观性到后现代的挑战(何兆武译). 济南: 山东大学出版社.
    [2]
    克罗齐. (2005). 历史学的理论与历史(田时纲译). 北京: 中国社会科学出版社.
    [3]
    林丹、李先军.(2015).解构与重构:托马斯·波克维茨"社会知识论"的思想通道.比较教育研究, (2), 74-79+90. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJJY201502012.htm
    [4]
    马克·布洛赫. (1997). 历史学家的技艺(张和声、程郁译). 上海: 上海社会科学院出版社.
    [5]
    王京春.(2008).福柯心中的历史:一种非科学、非理性的历史哲学.高校理论战线, (4), 39-45. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXLL200804010.htm
    [6]
    张斌贤.(2012).教育史观:批判与重构.教育学报, (6), 3-13. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XKJY201206000.htm
    [7]
    赵婧.(2012)."碎片化"思维与教育研究——托马斯·波克维茨教授访谈录.全球教育展望, (10), 3-7. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WGJN201210002.htm
    [8]
    Popkewitz, T. S. (2010). 理性之理性: 世界主义及其对学校的治理(胡美馨、韩春燕, 吴宗杰译). 全球教育展望, (3), 3-12+18.
    [9]
    Popkewitz, T. S.(1983). Change and stability in schooling:The dual quality of educational reform. Geelong:Deakin University Press.
    [10]
    Popkewitz, T. S.(1987). The formation of school subjects and the political context of schooling. Popkewitz, T. S. (Editor).The formation of school subjects:The struggle for creating an American institution. New York:The Falmer Press.
    [11]
    Popkewitz, T. S.(1991). A political sociology of education reform:Power/knowledge in teaching, teacher education and research. New York:Teachers College Press.
    [12]
    Popkewitz, T. S.(2007). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform:Science, education, and making society by making the child. New York:Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
    [13]
    Popkewitz, T. S.(2012). Styles of reason and the historical object:(Re) visioning the history of education. Thomas S. Popkewitz, Editor. (Re) visioning the history of education:Transnational perspectives on the questions, methods and knowledge. New York:Palgrave.
    [14]
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views (217) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return