Extended Compulsory Education and Reforms in Basic Education: Evidence from PISA 2015 Survey

CHEN Chunjin; GU Xiaoqing

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.05.007

Volume 36 Issue 5

Sep. 2018

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences) > 2018 > 36(5): 71-82+167+168

CHEN Chunjin, GU Xiaoqing. Extended Compulsory Education and Reforms in Basic Education: Evidence from PISA 2015 Survey[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2018, 36(5): 71-82+167+168. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.05.007

Citation:

CHEN Chunjin, GU Xiaoqing. Extended Compulsory Education and Reforms in Basic Education: Evidence from PISA 2015 Survey[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2018, 36(5): 71-82+167+168. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.05.007

Citation:

PDF( 2510 KB)

Extended Compulsory Education and Reforms in Basic Education: Evidence from PISA 2015 Survey

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2018.05.007

Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

Publish Date: 2018-09-20

Abstract

Abstract

Drawing on the test data from Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) in 2015, this paper attempts to examine the impact of extended compulsory education on the development of basic education from an international perspective. Duration of compulsory education is one of the key indicators to measure the development level of compulsory education. Compared with the age of enrollment, the stipulations of the years of compulsory education are quite different. Based on the analysis of survey data, it is found that extending compulsory education to 12 years had the greatest positive effect on students' science, mathematics and reading literacy scores, while admission age at 6 had significant and positive effect on students' literacy. Among the countries and economies whose cumulative expenditure per student is under USD 50, 000, higher spending on education is significantly associated with higher student achievement.
- compulsory education,
- basic education,
- PISA,
- student literacy

FullText(HTML)

References(14)

References

[1]	陈金芳, 刘巧利. (2015).我国义务教育年限的国际比较.教育研究, (1), 143-147. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=663563378
[2]	李家永. (1995).亚洲发展中国家义务教育学制比较.比较教育研究, (4), 10-14. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199500169003
[3]	陆明峰, 方超, 金俊. (2016).义务教育延长至高中阶段的合理性——教育扩展对劳动力收入差距影响的视角.全球教育展望, (11), 99-109. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=qqjyzw201611011
[4]	任玥. (2008).英:专家批评延长义务教育年限的提议.比较教育研究, (6), 93-94. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/wcbx201712004
[5]	徐谨严. (2002).实施义务教育不可冒进——对延长义务教育年限的几点不同认识.中国教育学刊, (5), 33-35. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgjyxk200205017
[6]	闫建璋. (2013).论确定义务教育年限合理性的三维标尺.西南大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 55-62. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xnsfdxxb-rwsh201301008
[7]	袁振国. (2015).义务教育年限适时调整可行吗?光明日报, (6). http://qikan.cqvip.com/article/detail.aspx?id=666190800
[8]	朱德全, 李鹏, 宋乃庆. (2017).中国义务教育均衡发展报告——基于《教育规划纲要》第三方评估的证据.华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), (1), 63-77. http://xbjk.ecnu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract9006.shtml
[9]	中华人民共和国国务院. (2017).国务院关于印发国家教育事业发展"十三五"规划的通知. 2017-01-19.
[10]	Heeringa, S. G., West, B. T., & Berglund, P. A. (2010). Applied Survey Data Analysis, London: Chapman and Hall.
[11]	OECD. (2016a). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework:Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy. Paris:OECD Publishing, 10-11.
[12]	OECD. (2016b). Education at a Glance 2016:OECD Indicators. Paris:OECD Publishing, 141.
[13]	OECD. (2016c). PISA 2015 Results (Volume Ⅰ):Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris:OECD Publishing, 265.
[14]	OECD. (2016d). PISA 2015 Results (Volume Ⅱ):Policies and Practices for Successful Schools. Paris:OECD Publishing, 186.