中国人文社会科学核心期刊

中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊

中文核心期刊

Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 37 Issue 2
Mar.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Liu Yunshan. The Limitation of Interest: Discussion Based on John Dewey's Perplexity[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2019, 37(2): 1-17. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.02.001
Citation: Liu Yunshan. The Limitation of Interest: Discussion Based on John Dewey's Perplexity[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2019, 37(2): 1-17. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.02.001

The Limitation of Interest: Discussion Based on John Dewey's Perplexity

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.02.001
  • Publish Date: 2019-03-20
  • The issue of interest is the major concern that Dewey and pragmatism strived to maintain in between of the stereotyped dogmatism and the romance of the new education, which combined objective and subjective, practice and thinking, potential and reality to cultivate children's character. However, the practice of progressivism education fell into the "internal negativism" of social improvement. How can the abstract dualistic principles be transformed into simple and feasible education? This is not only Dewey's perplexity but also the problem with education reform ever since. In this study, the author placed Dewey's text in the academic context, the ideological source of progressive education and the development of practice. Also, in the context of social reforms, the author analyzed the intricate relationship between educational theory and educational practice, social improvement, discussed ideological criticism, scientific experiments, social reformations, and explored the possibility and limitation of its implementation in education.
  • loading
  • [1]
    巴格莱.(2001).要素主义者的纲领.王承绪等编译.西方现代教育论著选.北京: 人民教育出版社.
    [2]
    白璧德.(2004).文学与美国的大学(张沛等译).北京: 北京大学出版社.
    [3]
    贝斯特.(2001).教育的荒地.王承绪等编译.西方现代教育论著选.北京: 人民教育出版社.
    [4]
    布鲁贝克.(2012).教育问题史(单中惠等译).济南: 山东教育出版社.
    [5]
    伯内特.(1982).如何评价杜威?.陈友松主编.当代西方教育哲学.北京: 教育科学出版社.
    [6]
    博伊德等.(1985).西方教育史(任宝祥等译).北京: 人民教育出版社.
    [7]
    杜威.(1991).我们怎样思维·经验与教育(姜文闵译).北京: 人民教育出版社.
    [8]
    杜威.(1994).学校与社会·明日之学校(赵祥麟等译).北京: 人民教育出版社.
    [9]
    杜威.(2001).民主主义与教育(王承绪译).北京: 人民教育出版社.
    [10]
    哈佛委员会.(2010).哈佛通识教育红皮书(李曼丽译).北京: 北京大学出版社.
    [11]
    赫尔巴特.(2015).普通教育学(李其龙译).北京: 人民教育出版社.
    [12]
    赫钦斯.(1997).民主社会中教育上的冲突(陆有铨译).台北: 桂冠图书公司.
    [13]
    克伯屈.(1994).杜威在教育上的影响.杜威.学校与社会(赵祥麟等译).北京: 人民教育出版社.
    [14]
    克雷明.(2013).学校的变革(单中惠译).济南: 山东教育出版社.
    [15]
    科南特.(2001).知识的堡垒.王承绪等编译.西方现代教育论著选.北京: 人民教育出版社
    [16]
    里科弗.(2001).教育与自由.王承绪等编译.西方现代教育论著选.北京: 人民教育出版社.
    [17]
    奈勒.(1982).教育哲学导论.陈友松主编.当代西方教育哲学.北京: 教育科学出版社.
    [18]
    托克维尔.(2017).论美国的民主(下)(董果良译).北京: 商务印书馆.
    [19]
    张斌贤, 王慧敏.(2014)."儿童中心"论在美国的兴起.北京大学教育评论, (1), 108-122. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1671-9468.2014.01.007
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views (303) PDF downloads(323) Cited by()
    Proportional views

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return