Quality Evaluation Needed for "The Higher-level Talent-cultivating System": A Philosophical Reflection Based on Ranking Evaluation

Zhang Xuewen

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.04.008

Volume 37 Issue 4

Jul. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences) > 2019 > 37(4): 84-93

Zhang Xuewen. Quality Evaluation Needed for 'The Higher-level Talent-cultivating System': A Philosophical Reflection Based on Ranking Evaluation[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2019, 37(4): 84-93. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.04.008

Citation:

Zhang Xuewen. Quality Evaluation Needed for "The Higher-level Talent-cultivating System": A Philosophical Reflection Based on Ranking Evaluation[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2019, 37(4): 84-93. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.04.008

Citation:

PDF( 607 KB)

Quality Evaluation Needed for "The Higher-level Talent-cultivating System": A Philosophical Reflection Based on Ranking Evaluation

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.04.008

Zhang Xuewen

Xinhua Wenzhai Periodical Office, Beijing 100706, China

Publish Date: 2019-07-20

Abstract

Abstract

In the last decade, various ranking evaluation of higher education quality has emerged, causing a lot of controversy. In philosophy methodology, the controversy over the evaluation of higher education quality is influenced by the naturalistic positivism and the humanistic anti-positivism. The confrontation of the popular "two cultures" in the west in the middle of the 20th century basically reflects the interaction between the two academic cultures. In order to understand and guide the evaluation of higher education correctly, it's essential to understand the basic functions and core concepts of higher education, and study the relationship between knowledge innovation, dissemination and transfer in modern universities. In addition, it's important to master the mechanism of "the research-teaching-study nexus" as a double helix group in modern research universities, and seek to build a higher-level talent-cultivating system, together with a scientific evaluation of higher education quality with Chinese characteristics.
- evaluation of the higher education quality,
- the research-teaching-study nexus,
- double helix group,
- talent-cultivating system

FullText(HTML)

References(23)

References

[1]	博耶.(1994).学术的反思——教授工作的重点领域.发达国家教育改革的动向和趋势(第五集).北京:人民教育出版社.
[2]	博耶.(2002).关于美国高等教育改革的演讲(涂艳国, 方彤译).北京: 教育科学出版社.
[3]	布鲁贝克.(2002).高等教育哲学(王承绪等译).杭州: 浙江大学出版社.
[4]	曹燕南.(2019).以"学"为中心的高校教学评价实践.江苏高教, (3), 13-20. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=jsgj201903004
[5]	邓莉, 施芳婷, 彭正梅.(2019).全球竞争力教育指标国际比较及政策建议.开放教育研究, (1), 13-24. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/kfjyyj201901003
[6]	郭碧坚, 韩宇.(1994).同行评议制.科学学研究, (3), 63-74. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgkxjj200203015
[7]	郭伟, 张男星.(2019).怎样认识和理解大学评价.大学(研究版), (1), 4-9.
[8]	克拉克.(2001).探究的场所: 现代大学的科研和研究生教育(王承绪译).杭州: 浙江教育出版社.
[9]	李立国.(2019).建立符合高校教师工作特点的学术评价体系.清华大学教育研究, (1), 10-12. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qhdxjyyj201901004
[10]	李子联, 魏畅.(2018).高等教育质量的宏观测度与时空差异.教育与经济, (4), 61-68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4870.2018.04.008
[11]	连志鑫, 刘路.(2019).全球化时代高等教育评价的挑战和探索.江苏高教, (3), 26-29. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jsgj201903006
[12]	刘念才, 程堂, Jansadlak.(2009).大学排名: 国际化与多元化.上海: 上海交通大学出版社.
[13]	纳伊曼.世界高等教育改革的探讨.北京:教育科学出版社.
[14]	牛可.(2009).大学革命、大学理念与领袖.世界知识, (23), 64-65. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK200902950185
[15]	邱均平, 董西露.(2018).五种世界大学排行榜比较研究.评价与管理, (3), 1-6. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJPG201703001.htm
[16]	吴康宁.(2017).人才培养:强化大学的根本职能.江苏高教, (12), 1-4.
[17]	亚瑟科恩.(2010).美国高等教育通史.北京:北京大学出版社.
[18]	姚利民.(2010).教学学术及其价值.河北科技大学学报, (4), 102-106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1653.2010.04.020
[19]	袁靖宇.(2019).高校人才培养方案修订的若干问题.中国高教研究, (2), 6-9. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zghgxyj201902003
[20]	张凯, 刘英杰.(2016).《莱顿宣言》的核心观点及借鉴意义.世界农业, (9), 179-183. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/shijny201609030
[21]	周作宇.(2018).教育学:一个时代的集体荣耀.教育研究, (12), 94-98. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/qnwxj201123095
[22]	朱贺玲.(2011).从洪堡到伯顿·克拉克:高校科研观的坚持与扩展.煤炭高等教育, (4), 107-110. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8154.2011.04.029
[23]	NSFC政策局译.(1992).同行评议——同行评议组提交英国研究理事会咨询报告委员会的报告(内部资料).