Citation: | Shao Faxian, Hu Weiping, Zhang Huan, Zhang Yanhong, Shou Xin. Sequential Analysis of Classroom Argumentation: The Pupils' Scientific Reasoning[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2019, 37(6): 48-60. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2019.06.005 |
[1] |
陈向明. (2014).优秀教师在教学中的思维和行动特征探究.教育研究, (5), 128-138. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=49756134
|
[2] |
胡卫平. (2016).基于核心素养的科学学业质量测评.中国考试, (8), 23-25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8427.2016.08.004
|
[3] |
林瑞吉. (1998).序列分析在諮商歷程研究的應用-以兩組諮商個案為例.師大學報:教育類, 43(1), 49-86.
|
[4] |
宋歌, 王祖浩. (2018).实践转向的科学论证教学:国际研究新进展.比较教育研究, (7), 59-67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7667.2018.07.008
|
[5] |
严文法, 胡卫平. (2009).国外青少年科学推理能力研究综述.外国中小学教育, (5), 23-28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8495.2009.05.010
|
[6] |
袁薇薇, 吴庆麟. (2008).科学思维的心理学探索.心理科学, (4), 956-959. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2008.04.045
|
[7] |
Bakeman, R., Gottman, J. M.(1997). Observing interaction: an introduction to sequential analysis. New York, NK: Cambridge University Press.
|
[8] |
Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (2011). Sequential analysis and observational methods for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
|
[9] |
Berland, L. K., & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 68-94. doi: 10.1002/tea.20446
|
[10] |
Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2011). Classroom communities' adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191-216. doi: 10.1002/sce.20420
|
[11] |
Duschl, A.R., & Gitomer, H.D. (1997). Strategies and challenges to changing the focus of assessment and instruction in science classrooms. Educational Assessment, 4(1), 37-73. doi: 10.1207/s15326977ea0401_2
|
[12] |
Ford, M. J. (2012). A dialogic account of sense-making in scientific argumentation and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 30(3), 207-245. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=10.1080/07370008.2012.689383
|
[13] |
Furtak, E. M., Hardy, I., Beinbrech, C., Shavelson, J.R., & Shemwell, T.J.(2010). A framework for analyzing evidence-based reasoning in science classroom discourse. Educational Assessment, 15(3-4), 175-196. doi: 10.1080/10627197.2010.530553
|
[14] |
Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Bakeman, R. (2017). Exploring the utility of sequential analysis in studying informal formative assessment practices. Educational Measurement Issues & Practice, 36(1), 28-38. doi: 10.1111/emip.12143
|
[15] |
Hardy, I., Kloetzer, B., Moeller, K., &Sodian, B. (2010). The analysis of classroom discourse: Elementary school science curricula advancing reasoning with evidence. Educational Assessment, 15(3-4), 197-221. doi: 10.1080/10627197.2010.530556
|
[16] |
Koerber, S., Sodian, B., Thoermer, C., & Nett, U. (2005). Scientific reasoning in young children: Preschoolers' ability to evaluate covariation evidence. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 64(3), 141-152. doi: 10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.141
|
[17] |
Mcneill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94(2), 203-229. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=8e6d236a69dfa47d28df726a13215524&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
|
[18] |
Osborne, J. F., Henderson, J. B., Macpherson, A., Szu, E., Wild, A., & Yao, S. (2016). The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(6), 821-846. doi: 10.1002/tea.21316
|
[19] |
Schauble, L. (1990).Belief revision in children: The role of prior knowledge and strategies for generating evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49(1), 31-57. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(90)90048-D
|
[20] |
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 235-260. doi: 10.1080/09500690500336957
|
[21] |
Tolmie, A. K., Ghazali, Z., & Morris, S. (2016). Children's science learning: A core skills approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 481-497. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12119
|
[22] |
Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172-223. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=da3348729c29dfa7e7ff4c08e793b66a&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
|