The State, Guild and Labour in the Process of Skill Formation: A Sociological Approach to the Evolution of Appenticeship in England

Wang Xing

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.04.008

Volume 38 Issue 4

Apr. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences) > 2020 > 38(4): 96-106

Wang Xing. The State, Guild and Labour in the Process of Skill Formation: A Sociological Approach to the Evolution of Appenticeship in England[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(4): 96-106. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.04.008

Citation:

Wang Xing. The State, Guild and Labour in the Process of Skill Formation: A Sociological Approach to the Evolution of Appenticeship in England[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(4): 96-106. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.04.008

Citation:

PDF( 732 KB)

The State, Guild and Labour in the Process of Skill Formation: A Sociological Approach to the Evolution of Appenticeship in England

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.04.008

Wang Xing

Zhou Enlai School of Government, Nankai University, Tianjin 300371, China

Publish Date: 2020-04-01

Abstract

Abstract

The apprenticeship system of England was working from 12th century to 20th century. The process of its evolution can be divided into three stages, namely handicraft period, state intervention period, and industry revolution period. During the handicraf period, the apprenticeship system was embeded into the social relationship between master class and apprentice class, thus building the social base for its skill formation. The power of free market changed this kind of social base, and the mode of merchant dominated production meant the change of production relationship. This also led to the stratification of master class. During the industry revolution, the regulation power of apprenticeship moved from guild to skilled trade union. The apprenticeship was reduced to the tool of labour conflict. In conclusion, the failure of apprenticeship resulted from the change of social class structure in England rather than technical innovation.
- guild,
- skilled worker union,
- apprenticeship,
- skill formation

FullText(HTML)

References(25)

References

[1]	戴尔. (2010). 转型的时代: 中世纪晚期英国的经济与社会(费玉梅译). 北京: 社会科学文献出版社.
[2]	杜以德等. (2007). 成人教育发展纵论. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社.
[3]	关晶. (2010). 西方学徒制的历史演变及思考. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),(1),81−90.
[4]	蒋孟引（主编）. (1988). 英国史. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社.
[5]	金志霖. (1996). 英国行会史. 上海: 上海社会科学院出版社.
[6]	李路路. (2012). 社会结构阶层化和利益关系市场化——中国社会管理面临的新挑战. 社会学研究,(2),1−19.
[7]	梁茂信. (2010). 近代早期英国契约工制度的形成及其性质. 求是学刊,(4),123−130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7504.2010.04.020
[8]	斯密. (2011). 国富论(郭大力, 王亚南译). 上海: 上海三联书店.
[9]	田志磊, 李俊, 朱俊. (2019). 探寻职业教育产教融合的治理之道. 未刊稿.
[10]	王川. (2008). 论学徒制职业教育的产生与发展. 职业教育论坛,(5),60−64.
[11]	王觉非. (1994). 近代英国史. 南京: 南京大学出版社.
[12]	王星. (2009). 劳动安全与技能养成. 江苏社会科学,(5),107−113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8671.2009.05.018
[13]	王星. (2014). 技能形成的社会建构: 中国工厂师徒制变迁历程的社会学分析. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社.
[14]	王星. (2015). 技能形成的社会建构: 德国学徒制现代化转型的社会学分析. 社会,(1),184−205.
[15]	王星. (2019). 制造产业升级路径与产业工人技能形成. 高等职业教育探索,(3),1−5.
[16]	韦伯. (2004). 支配社会学(康乐, 简惠美译). 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社.
[17]	徐平利. (2005). 中世纪行会制度与职业教育的孕育. 教育评论,(5),156−158.
[18]	中共中央、国务院. (2017). 新时期产业工人队伍建设改革方案(2017年2月6日). 取自: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2017-06/19/content_5203750.htm.
[19]	Burawoy, M. (1985). The Politics of Production: Factory Regimes under Capitalism and Socialism. London: Verso.
[20]	Clark, P. & Souden, D. (1987). Migration and Society in Early Modern England. London: Hutchinson Education.
[21]	Evans, K. (1975). The Development and Structure of the English Education System. London: University of London Press.
[22]	Knights, D. & Willmott, H. C. (eds). (1987). New Technology and the Labour Process. London: Macmillan.
[23]	Lipson, E. (1935). The Economic History of England. London: Adam and Charles Black.
[24]	Thelen. (2004). How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[25]	Weisz, G. (1925). Report of an Inquiry into Apprenticeship and Training. London: Ministry of Labour.