The Relationship Research of Transformational Leadership and School Teachers’ Organizational Commitment:A Mediating Effect of Teachers’ Self-efficacy

Liu Lili; Kong Man

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.07.008

Volume 38 Issue 7

Jul. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences) > 2020 > 38(7): 97-105

Liu Lili, Kong Man. The Relationship Research of Transformational Leadership and School Teachers’ Organizational Commitment:A Mediating Effect of Teachers’ Self-efficacy[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(7): 97-105. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.07.008

Citation:

Liu Lili, Kong Man. The Relationship Research of Transformational Leadership and School Teachers’ Organizational Commitment:A Mediating Effect of Teachers’ Self-efficacy[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(7): 97-105. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.07.008

Citation:

Liu Lili, Kong Man. The Relationship Research of Transformational Leadership and School Teachers’ Organizational Commitment:A Mediating Effect of Teachers’ Self-efficacy[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(7): 97-105. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.07.008

PDF( 1044 KB)

The Relationship Research of Transformational Leadership and School Teachers’ Organizational Commitment:A Mediating Effect of Teachers’ Self-efficacy

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.07.008

Liu Lili,
Kong Man

East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062

Available Online: 2020-07-14
Publish Date: 2020-07-14

Abstract

Abstract

In order to study the direct impact of the transformational leadership of the principal on the organizational commitment level of teachers and the mediating effect of teachers’ self-efficacy in the impact mechanism, the transformational leadership and teacher self-efficacy were designed for 520 high school teachers from many provinces and cities. By using AMOS 23.0,we construct a structural equation model to explore the mechanism of interaction between variables, combined with Bootstrap to introduce the teacher self-efficacy as a mediator variable for the empirical analysis. The analysis results show that the principal’s transformational leadership and teacher’s self-efficacy have a significant positive impact on teacher’s organizational commitment; teacher’s self-efficacy plays a partial intermediary role in the relationship between the principal’s transformational leadership and the teacher’s organizational commitment. The principal's transformational leadership influences teachers’ organizational commitment by affecting teachers’ self-efficacy.
- transformational leadership,
- organizational commitment,
- self-efficacy,
- influence mechanism,
- mediation

FullText(HTML)

References(24)

References

[1]	陈文晶, 时勘. (2007). 变革型领导和交易型领导的回顾与展望. 管理评论,(09),22−29.
[2]	库泽斯、波斯纳、戴启思等. (2014). 领导力: 如何在组织中成就卓越(亚洲版)（陈文芳等译）, 北京: 电子工业出版社.
[3]	李超平, 时勘. (2005). 变革型领导的结构与测量. 心理学报,37(6),803−811.
[4]	凌文栓, 张治灿, 方俐洛. (2000). 中国职工组织承诺的结构模型研究. 管理科学学报,3(2),76−80. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-9807.2000.02.012
[5]	庞丽娟, 洪秀敏. (2005). 教师自我效能感: 教师自主发展的重要内在动力机制. 教师教育研究,(04),43−46.
[6]	时晨晨. (2019). 校长该如何进行教学领导?. 人民教育,(8),8.
[7]	宋爱红, 蔡永红. (2005). 教师组织承诺结构的验证性因素分析. 心理发展与教育,21(2),48−51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4918.2005.02.009
[8]	托马斯•J.萨乔万尼. (2002). 道德领导抵及学校改善的核心（冯大鸣译）. 上海: 上海教育出版社.
[9]	吴量, 詹浩洋. (2017). 中文版教师自我效能感量表(TSE)(简版)的信度和效度研究. 心理技术与应用,5(11),672−679.
[10]	辛涛, 申继亮, 林崇德. (1994). 教师自我效能感与学校因素关系的研究. 教育研究,(10),16−20.
[11]	Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 5, 1−43.
[12]	Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1996). Multifactor leadership questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, , 121−126.
[13]	Bass, B. M. (1995). Theory of transformational leadership redux. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(4), 463−478. doi: 10.1016/1048-9843(95)90021-7
[14]	Burns J M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
[15]	Guskey, T. R. (1987). Context variables that affect measures of teacher efficacy. The Journal of educational research, 81(1), 41−47. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1987.10885795
[16]	Jing, L., & Zhang, D. (2014). The mediation of performance in the relationship of organizational commitment to university faculty’s effectiveness. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(1), 141−153. doi: 10.1007/s12564-013-9309-2
[17]	Leithwood, K. A. (1992). The move toward transformational leadership. Educational Leadership, 49(5), 8−12.
[18]	Leithwood, K., Begley, P. T., & Cousins, J. B. (1994). Developing Expert Leadership for Future Schools, (11): 331.
[19]	Leithwood, K., & Others, A. (1993). Secondary school teachers’ commitment to change: the contributions of transformational leadership., 62(62), 66−74.
[20]	Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human resource management review, 1(1), 61−89. doi: 10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
[21]	Mohammed S. I., Simin G. S., Saedah Siraj M. K. (2014). Can transformational leadership influence on teachers’commitment towards organization, teaching profession, and students learning? A quantitative analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(2), 177−190. doi: 10.1007/s12564-013-9308-3
[22]	Newmann, F. M., Rutter, R. A., & Smith, M. S. (1989). Organizational factors that affect school sense of efficacy, community, and expectations. Sociology of education, , 221−238.
[23]	Silins H, Mulford B. (2002). Leadership and School Results: Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration. Berlin: Springer Netherlands, (02), 561−612.
[24]	Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and teacher education, 17(7), 783−805. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1