Research on School Safety and its Legislation: From the Perspective of Risk Regulatory

Shen Suping; Zhou Hang

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.10.008

Volume 38 Issue 10

Oct. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences) > 2020 > 38(10): 89-100

Shen Suping, Zhou Hang. Research on School Safety and its Legislation: From the Perspective of Risk Regulatory[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(10): 89-100. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.10.008

Citation:

Shen Suping, Zhou Hang. Research on School Safety and its Legislation: From the Perspective of Risk Regulatory[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(10): 89-100. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.10.008

Citation:

PDF( 593 KB)

Research on School Safety and its Legislation: From the Perspective of Risk Regulatory

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.10.008

School of Education, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

Publish Date: 2020-10-20

Abstract

Abstract

Since the reform and opening-up, the legal regulation of school risk in China has gone through the stages of policy regulation, legal regulation and comprehensive regulation. It has initially established a legal regulation system of school risk which is dominated by the government, participated by multiple subjects and connected with the public security governance system in China. From the perspective of risk regulatory, there are many deficiencies in the principles, purposes, subjects and methods of risk regulatory. In order to promote the formulation of Regulation of School Safety, we should establish the principle of risk prevention, reconstruct the purpose of risk regulatory, expand the activities of risk regulatory and redefine regulatory space.
- school safety,
- educational law,
- risk regulatory,
- legal regulation

FullText(HTML)

References(18)

References

[1]	贝克. (2018). 风险社会: 新的现代性之路(张文杰, 何博闻译). 南京: 译林出版社.
[2]	贝克, 威尔姆斯. (2001). 自由与资本主义——与著名社会学家乌尔里希•贝克对话(路国林译). 杭州: 浙江人民出版社.
[3]	方益权等. (2013). 中国学校安全立法研究. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社.
[4]	哈洛, 罗林斯. (2004). 法律与行政(下)(杨伟东等译). 北京: 商务印书馆.
[5]	教育部. (2019—02—22, a). 教育部2019年工作要点. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/201902/t20190222_370722.html. 2019—10—25.
[6]	教育部. (2019—08—20, b). 依法治理“校闹”为学校办学安全托底. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s271/201908/t20190820_395093.html. 2019—10—25.
[7]	李媛. (2016). 大数据时代个人信息保护研究. 西南政法大学博士论文.
[8]	刘水林, 吴锐. (2016). 论“规制行政法”的范式革命. 法律科学 (西北政法大学学报),34(03),60−71.
[9]	桑斯坦. (2008). 权利革命之后: 重塑规制国(钟瑞华译). 北京: 中国人民大学出版社.
[10]	斯科特. (2018). 规制、治理与法律: 前沿问题研究（安永康译）. 北京: 清华大学出版社.
[11]	宋华琳. (2017). 迈向规制与治理的法律前沿:评科林•斯科特新著《规制、治理与法律: 前沿问题研究》. 法治现代化研究,1(06),182−192.
[12]	王大泉. (2013). 学校安全立法的现状与需求. 北京教育, (10),7−8.
[13]	王旭. (2019). 论国家在宪法上的风险预防义务. 法商研究,36(05),112−125.
[14]	王耀峰, 张志超. (2013). 高校周边环境对大学生道德观念的影响及治理策略. 教育探索, (11),126−127. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0845.2013.11.052
[15]	薛晓源, 刘国良. (2005). 全球风险世界: 现在与未来——德国著名社会学家、风险社会理论创始人乌尔里希•贝克教授访谈录. 马克思主义与现实, (1),44−55.
[16]	张瑜. (2012). 民办高校周边环境的治理和对策. 赤峰学院学报, (4),242−243.
[17]	Black, J. (2001). Decentring Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self-Regulation in a “Post-Regulatory” World. Current Legal Problems, (54), 103−147.
[18]	OECD. (1995). Recommendation of the Council of the OECD on Improving the Quality of Government Regulation, OECD/GD(95)95, Note 1.