Study on the Improvement of Students’ Satisfaction with the Quality of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education in Colleges and Universities in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

Zhuo Zelin

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.12.005

Volume 38 Issue 12

Dec. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences) > 2020 > 38(12): 53-63

Zhuo Zelin. Study on the Improvement of Students’ Satisfaction with the Quality of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education in Colleges and Universities in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(12): 53-63. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.12.005

Citation:

Zhuo Zelin. Study on the Improvement of Students’ Satisfaction with the Quality of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education in Colleges and Universities in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(12): 53-63. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.12.005

Citation:

Zhuo Zelin. Study on the Improvement of Students’ Satisfaction with the Quality of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education in Colleges and Universities in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2020, 38(12): 53-63. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.12.005

PDF( 718 KB)

Study on the Improvement of Students’ Satisfaction with the Quality of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education in Colleges and Universities in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2020.12.005

Zhuo Zelin

Institute of International and Comparative Education, Institute for Advanced Study of Educational Development in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China

Publish Date: 2020-12-17

Abstract

Abstract

Innovative and Entrepreneurial talents serve as the core to build an international innovation technology hub in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, where the higher education is the major carrier for those talents cultivation. In a random sampling, a total of 5, 021 valid questionnaires were conducted in 58 colleges and universities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area which includes 9+2 cities.The results showed that the total score of students’ satisfaction evaluation of innovation and entrepreneurship education in colleges and universities was 3.43, which is in the middle and upper level. Specifically, the implementation and popularization of innovation and entrepreneurship education in colleges universities is satisfactory and the corresponding curriculum system can be adjusted in accordance with the strategic development trend. However, there are some problems to be solved. First, it is still difficult to integrate effectively with regional innovative and entrepreneurial resources in the process of innovation and entrepreneurship education. Second, the innovation and entrepreneurship education lays stress on theory with a single teaching method and insufficient integration with professional education. In addition, there is a shortage of innovation and entrepreneurship platforms, and the cooperative mechanism among colleges and universities, society and government needs to be improved. Last, there is a serious shortage of teachers for innovation and entrepreneurship education. In order to promote the development of innovation and entrepreneurship education, colleges and universities must establish a hierarchical system for innovation and entrepreneurship education based on their own conditions. They can take advantage of the innovative and entrepreneurial resources and industrial characteristics of the core cities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Moreover, it's necessary to develop excellent courses integrating professional education with innovation and entrepreneurship education and improve the mechanism of appointment and performance evaluation.

FullText(HTML)

References(23)

References

[1]	陈丽, 陈劲松. (2019). 基于三螺旋创新创业教育公共服务体系构建研究. 当代教育科学, (7),87—91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2221.2019.07.018
[2]	段杰. (2020). 粤港澳大湾区创新生态系统演进路径及创新能力: 基于与旧金山湾区比较的视角. 深圳大学学学报(人文社会科学版),37(2),91—99.
[3]	辜胜阻, 曹冬梅, 杨嵋. (2018). 构建粤港澳大湾区创新生态系统的战略思考. 中国软科学, (4),1—9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2018.04.001
[4]	韩玉志. (2006). 美国大学生满意度调查方法评介. 比较教育研究,27(6),60—64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7667.2006.06.013
[5]	黄兆信, 杜金宸. (2020). 双创升级背景下大学生公益创业学习的机制研究. 中国电化教育, (8),41—47+77. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9860.2020.08.007
[6]	黄兆信, 黄扬杰. (2019). 创新创业教育质量评价探新——来自全国1231所高等学校的实证研究. 教育研究, (7),91—101.
[7]	黄兆信, 王志强. (2013). 论高校创业教育与专业教育的融合. 教育研究, (12),59—67.
[8]	黎勇, 崔延强. (2019). 地方高校创业教育与区域社会协同发展的创新机制研究. 国家教育行政学院学报, (12),34—40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4038.2019.12.006
[9]	李伟铭, 黎春燕, 杜晓华. (2013). 我国高校创业教育十年: 演进、问题与体系建设. 教育研究, (6),44—53.
[10]	李玉倩. (2017). 基于结构方程模型的高等教育学生满意度研究. 高教探索, (2),45—50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9760.2017.02.009
[11]	倪外. (2018). 香港建设全球科技创新中心: 困境、机理与路径. 上海经济研究, (10),107—115.
[12]	欧小军. (2018). 世界一流大湾区高水平大学集群发展研究——以纽约、旧金山、东京三大湾区为例. 四川理工学院学报(社会科学版), (03),88—105.
[13]	施永川. (2018). 新时期创新创业教育面临的问题和发展方向——访香港城市大学系统工程及工程管理副教授孙洪义. 世界教育信息,456(24),37—44.
[14]	孙友然, 杨淼, 江歌. (2016). 基于结构方程的高校实践教学满意度模型构建研究. 高教探索, (1),74—81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9760.2016.01.014
[15]	文君. (2015). 深化文科院校创新创业教育路径探索. 中国高等教育, (21),45—47.
[16]	夏正林. (2019). 粤港澳大湾区“双创”的法制建设问题及对策研究——基于广东省政府及粤港澳大湾区内地9市的政策分析. 华南理工大学学报(社会科学版), (6),21—30.
[17]	张务农. (2014). 我国学校创业教育发展: 形态、问题及路径. 教育发展研究, (03),55—61.
[18]	卓泽林. (2019a). 美国旧金山湾区高等教育整合动因及路径. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版), (02),29—36.
[19]	卓泽林. (2019b). 美国雪城大学全校性创业教育: 路径、影响及启示. 大学教育科学, (02),99—106.
[20]	Fiet J O. (2001). The pedagogical side of entrepreneurship theory. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(2), 101—117.
[21]	Gremler D. D., McCollough. M. A. (2002). Student Satisfaction Guarantees: An Empirical Examination of Attitudes, Antecedents, and Consequences. Journal of Marketing Education, 24(24), 150—160.
[22]	Jones, B., & Iredale, N. (2006). Developing an entrepreneurial life skills summer school. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(3), 233—244. doi: 10.1080/14703290600618522
[23]	Martensen, A. Gronholdt,, l. Eskildsen, J. K. Kristensen, K. (2000). Measuring student oriented quality in higher education: application of the ECSI methodology. Sinergie Rapporti di Ricerca, 9(18), 371—383.