中国人文社会科学核心期刊

中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊

中文核心期刊

Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 39 Issue 1
Jan.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Ren Haitao, Yang Xinglong. The Legal Status of Primary and Secondary Schools[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(1): 40-48. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.01.003
Citation: Ren Haitao, Yang Xinglong. The Legal Status of Primary and Secondary Schools[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(1): 40-48. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.01.003

The Legal Status of Primary and Secondary Schools

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.01.003
  • Available Online: 2021-01-27
  • Publish Date: 2021-01-20
  • The definition of the legal status of the school is the basic premise for studying the internal construction and external relations of the school. From the current judicial practice, the legal status of colleges and universities is getting clearer, but the legal status of primary and secondary schools is still to be explored, which is worth paying attention to. The legal status of primary and secondary schools in China can be divided into civil legal status and administrative legal status. According to the current legal norms of China, its definition needs to be dealt with in a diversified way according to different types of primary and secondary schools. In terms of civil legal status, public primary and secondary schools in China do not have the status of independent legal person, while private primary and secondary schools have the status of legal person. As far as administrative legal status is concerned, primary and secondary schools may be administrative counterparts or internal subsidiary in their relations with administrative organs, and may have the legal status of administrative subjects when evaluating teachers' positions and discharging students from non-compulsory education.
  • loading
  • [1]
    曹淑江, 范开秀. (2008). 关于我国公立义务教育学校法律地位的探讨. 教育理论与实践,(5),28—30.
    [2]
    陈鹏. (2020). 重新确立教师的法律地位是《教师法》修订的核心问题. 中国教育学刊,(04),3.
    [3]
    褚宏启. (2003). 中小学法律问题分析(理论篇). 北京: 红旗出版社.
    [4]
    方流芳. (2007). 从法律视角看中国事业单位改革—事业单位“法人化”批判. 比较法研究,(03),1—28.
    [5]
    傅添. (2009). 我国公立中小学法律地位的法理分析. 天津市教科院学报,(03),31—33+39.
    [6]
    胡劲松, 葛新斌. (2001). 关于我国学校“法人地位”的法理分析. 教育理论与实践,(06),19—24.
    [7]
    姜明安. (2015). 行政法与行政诉讼法. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
    [8]
    李廷洲, 陆莎, 钱冬明. (2020). 我国公办、民办中小学教师流动的主要特征、趋势与政策分析. 教育发展研究,40(12),74—79.
    [9]
    李晓燕. (2010). 义务教育法律制度的理论与实践. 武汉: 华中师范大学出版社.
    [10]
    马怀德. (2000). 公务法人问题研究. 中国法学,(04),41—48.
    [11]
    马怀德. (2007). 学校法律制度研究. 北京: 北京大学出版社.
    [12]
    彭虹斌. (2011). 大陆法系与英美法系国家公立中小学法律地位比较与启示. 外国中小学教育,(05),31—36.
    [13]
    彭虹斌. (2014). 作为政府下属机构的公立中小学法律地位研究. 中国教育法制评论,(1),26—37.
    [14]
    任海涛. (2020). 论教育法体系化是法典化的前提基础. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报,(5),16—26.
    [15]
    申素平. (2009). 教育法学: 原理、规范与应用. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
    [16]
    余芳, 陈书昆. (2003). 我国公立中小学法律地位的法理学分析. 教学与管理,(20),38—40.
    [17]
    余雅风. (2016). 中小学教育法与教育政策读本. 长春: 东北师范大学出版社.
    [18]
    湛中乐, 靳澜涛. (2020). 教师申诉制度运行的法治困境及其出路. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报,(4),7—13.
    [19]
    张丽. (2007). 教育法律问题研究. 北京: 法律出版社.
    [20]
    周光礼. (2005). 教育与法律. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views (193) PDF downloads(13) Cited by()
    Proportional views

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return