The Quality of Undergraduate Teaching and Learning in China: A Ten-year Exploration Based on China College Student Survey

Huang Yuheng; Zhou Xiting; Shi Jinghuan

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.01.010

Volume 39 Issue 1

Jan. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences) > 2021 > 39(1): 116-126

Huang Yuheng, Zhou Xiting, Shi Jinghuan. The Quality of Undergraduate Teaching and Learning in China: A Ten-year Exploration Based on China College Student Survey[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(1): 116-126. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.01.010

Citation:

Huang Yuheng, Zhou Xiting, Shi Jinghuan. The Quality of Undergraduate Teaching and Learning in China: A Ten-year Exploration Based on China College Student Survey[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(1): 116-126. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.01.010

Citation:

PDF( 1141 KB)

The Quality of Undergraduate Teaching and Learning in China: A Ten-year Exploration Based on China College Student Survey

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.01.010

Institute of Education, Tsinghua University, 100084, China

Available Online: 2021-01-27
Publish Date: 2021-01-20

Abstract

Abstract

Teaching and learning is the most important educational activity for universities to promote the development of students and respond to the needs of society. Based on the framework of learning-oriented assessment, combined with the years of theoretical and data exploration of CCSS, this study constructs eight indicators to assess the quality of undergraduate teaching and learning in universities of China. They are high-order cognitive ability, problem-solving ability, reading and writing ability, active learning, student interaction, instruction, teacher-student interaction and online teaching. This quality evaluation index system is used to analyze the quality level and trend of undergraduate teaching and learning in China in the past ten years.
- undergraduate teaching and learning,
- quality evaluation,
- student survey

FullText(HTML)

References(23)

References

[1]	蔡军, 汪霞. (2015). 多元与协商: 麻省理工学院本科生课程评价特征与启示. 高教探索,(5),52—56.
[2]	蔡映辉. (2005). 构建“以人为本”学生评教系统的实践与探索. 中国大学教学,(3),48—49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0450.2005.03.017
[3]	哈巍, 赵颖. (2019). 教学相“涨”: 高校学生成绩和评教分数双重膨胀研究. 社会学研究,(1),84—105.
[4]	韩映雄, 周林芝. (2018). 学生评教的信度, 效度, 影响因素及应用风险. 复旦教育论坛,16(6),74—81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0059.2018.06.012
[5]	黄雨恒, 郭菲, 史静寰. (2016). 大学生满意度调查能告诉我们什么. 北京大学教育评论,14(4),139—154+189.
[6]	黄雨恒, 周溪亭, 史静寰. (2019). 以学为本的大学课程教学质量评价研究. 中国教育政策评论(00), 262−278.
[7]	蒋雅静, 陆道坤. (2019). 一流大学学生评教体系研究—以哈佛、耶鲁、牛津、剑桥等十所高校为例. 高教探索,(5),49—54.
[8]	雷敏. (2005). 论提高高校学生评教质量的方法和策略. 高教探索,(1),50—53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9760.2005.01.015
[9]	李建芬, 饶国军. (2004). 高校学生评教的有效性及改进措施. 教育理论与实践,(20),26—27.
[10]	李静, 孙昌盛. (2009). 美国高校教学质量评价指标体系的特点及启示. 黑龙江高教研究,(11),96—98. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2614.2009.11.034
[11]	李贞刚, 陈强, 孙婷婷. (2019). “以学生为中心”改进学生评教的思考与实践. 现代教育管理,(1),67—71.
[12]	理查德·詹姆斯, 邢欢, 叶赋桂. (2014). 澳大利亚高等教育和国家教学标准. 清华大学教育研究,(3),21—28.
[13]	陆一, 史静寰. (2015). 拔尖创新人才培养中影响学术志趣的教育因素探析—以清华大学生命科学专业本科生为例. 教育研究,36(5),38—47.
[14]	罗燕, 海蒂•罗斯, 岑逾豪. (2009). 国际比较视野中的高等教育测量—NSSE-China工具的开发:文化适应与信度、效度报告. 复旦教育论坛,(05),14—20.
[15]	王朋. (2017). 学生•教师•学习: 美国大学教学评价的路径演变—基于约翰•比格斯的3P教学模型. 高教探索,(10),52—57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9760.2017.10.009
[16]	张光进, 卓成刚. (2017). 大学生评价课堂教学内容能力的实证研究. 中国大学教学,(11),82—87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0450.2017.11.019
[17]	张华峰, 郭菲, 史静寰. (2017). 促进家庭第一代大学生参与高影响力教育活动的研究. 教育研究,38(6),32—43.
[18]	赵春鱼. (2016). 高校课程质量评价存在的问题及其改进—基于全国49所高校的现状调查. 教育发展研究,(23),44—51.
[19]	赵炬明. (2016). 论新三中心: 概念与历史. 高等工程教育研究,(3),35—56.
[20]	赵颖. (2019). 学生评教制度下分数膨胀的内在逻辑: 博弈模型的建立. 中国高教研究,(4),24—30+36.
[21]	周廷勇, 周作宇. (2018). 高等教育质量观的理论反思. 大学教育科学,(2),9—18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0717.2018.02.002
[22]	Crisan, A. N., & Pop, G. M. (2019). Creative, Quality Oriented Rethinking of the Assessment Strategy at the University Level Courses. A Case Study. In: Ivanov V. et al. (eds) Advances in Design, Simulation and Manufacturing II. DSMIE 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham.
[23]	McPherson, M., & Jewell, R. (2007). Leveling the Playing Field: Should Student Evaluation Scores be Adjusted?. Social Science Quarterly, 88(3), 868—881. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00487.x