How Family Environment Influences Pupils’ Learning Performance? Based on Investigations on the Action Effect of “Home-School Co-education” in New Educational Experiment

Yang Fan

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.03.007

Volume 39 Issue 3

Mar. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences) > 2021 > 39(3): 71-83

Yang Fan. How Family Environment Influences Pupils’ Learning Performance? Based on Investigations on the Action Effect of “Home-School Co-education” in New Educational Experiment[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(3): 71-83. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.03.007

Citation:

Yang Fan. How Family Environment Influences Pupils’ Learning Performance? Based on Investigations on the Action Effect of “Home-School Co-education” in New Educational Experiment[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(3): 71-83. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.03.007

Citation:

Yang Fan. How Family Environment Influences Pupils’ Learning Performance? Based on Investigations on the Action Effect of “Home-School Co-education” in New Educational Experiment[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(3): 71-83. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.03.007

PDF( 827 KB)

How Family Environment Influences Pupils’ Learning Performance? Based on Investigations on the Action Effect of “Home-School Co-education” in New Educational Experiment

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.03.007

Yang Fan

School of Education, Soochow University, Jiangsu Suzhou 215123, China

Publish Date: 2021-03-23

Abstract

Abstract

The present research constructes the basic mechanism that family environment influences pupils’ learning performance. Data were collected from 770 pupils who engaged in “home-school co-education” and 726 pupils who didn’t engage in “home-school co-education” in New Educational Experiment schools through paired-sampled method. Using the methods such as structural equation model and multiple linear regression analysis, the results showed that the indirect effect of family environment on pupils’ learning performance through mediating variables such as the students’ learning engagement and school environment was significant. School environment had a significantly positive effect on students’ learning engagement and learning performance, and home-school interaction could significantly improve students’ learning performance. The home collections of pupils who engaged in New Education Experiment schools were significantly higher than those in the Non-new Education Experiment schools. The longer the schools participated in the “home-school co-education” of New Educational Experiment, the better the students’ reading performance and mathematics performance were. In order to strengthen the positive influence of the family environment on pupils’ learning performance, while taking basic factors such as students’ gender, age and school location into account, we can learn from the action experience of New Education Experiment to improve the pupils’ learning performance by creating family study, building literary campus, achieving a goal once a month and optimizing home-school cooperation.
- family environment,
- learning performance,
- learning engagement,
- home-school co-education

FullText(HTML)

References(34)

References

[1]	丁阅, 马云鹏. (2011). 课堂环境与学生学习表现的因果关系研究—一个基于数学课堂的前实验研究. 全球教育展望,40(10),22—29.
[2]	何旭明, 陈向明. (2008). 学生的学习投入对学习兴趣的影响研究. 全球教育展望,37(3),46—51.
[3]	洪岩璧, 赵延东. (2014). 从资本到惯习: 中国城市家庭教育模式的阶层分化. 社会学研究,(4),73—93.
[4]	蒋逸民. (2007). 国外对中小学生家庭环境影响的研究及其启示. 外国教育研究,34(4),29—34.
[5]	雷望红. (2019). 竞争性合作: 城市教育中家校关系的互动逻辑—基于江浙两地城区学校的实证分析. 北京社会科学,(9),55—65.
[6]	雷浩, 田澜, 刘衍玲. (2011). 高中生学业勤奋度与学业成绩的相关研究. 中国学校卫生,30(02),46—47.
[7]	雷浩, 刘衍玲, 田澜. (2012). 家庭环境、班级环境与高中生学业成绩的关系: 学业勤奋度的中介作用. 上海教育科研,31(4),17—20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2020.2012.04.005
[8]	刘衍玲, 臧原, 张大均. (2007). 家校合作研究述评. 心理科学,30(2),400—402. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2007.02.037
[9]	刘保中. (2018). “鸿沟”与“鄙视链”: 家庭教育投入的阶层差异—基于北上广特大城市的实证分析. 北京工业大学学报:社会科学版,(2),12—20.
[10]	李东琴. (2016). 新教育实验的学生阅读素养报告. 中国教育学刊,(5),10—15.
[11]	卢玮, 俞冰, 杨帆, 许庆豫. (2018). 关注学生成长: 新教育实验学校实践效果的基本评估—基于新教育实验学校与非新教育实验学校的比较. 基础教育,15(4),58—66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2232.2018.04.008
[12]	庞海波. (2009). 中学班级环境与学生学业成绩的关系. 心理科学,64(03),231—234.
[13]	任春荣, 辛涛. (2013). 家庭社会经济地位对小学生成绩预测效应的追踪研究. 教育研究,(3),79—87.
[14]	温红博, 梁凯丽, 刘先伟. (2016). 家庭环境对中学生阅读能力的影响: 阅读投入、阅读兴趣的中介作用. 心理学报,48(3),248—257.
[15]	吴重涵. (2013). 从国际视野重新审视家校合作—《学校、家庭和社区合作伙伴:行动手册》中文版序. 教育学术月刊,(1),108—111.
[16]	王东宇. (2003). 心理健康与家庭环境和中学生学业成绩的关系. 健康心理学杂志,11(01),50—52.
[17]	徐萍萍, 王介君. (2014). 家庭环境对青少年自律道德发展的影响研究. 中国教育学刊,35(6),97—101.
[18]	杨雄, 刘程. (2013). 关于学校、家庭、社会“三位一体”教育合作的思考. 社会科学,35(1),92—101.
[19]	杨晓, 李松涛. (2013). 基于共生理念的家校合作改革构想. 教育科学,29(5),14—18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8064.2013.05.003
[20]	杨帆, 许庆豫. (2017). 教师对学校环境的感知与专业发展. 教育学报,(1),82—92.
[21]	杨帆, 俞冰, 朱永新, 许庆豫. (2017). 校园欺凌与学校归属感的相关效应: 来自新教育实验的证据. 课程,教材,教法,(5),113—120.
[22]	杨立军, 张薇. (2016). 大学生学习投入的影响因素及其作用机制. 高教发展与评估,32(6),49—61. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1672-8742.2016.06.006
[23]	朱永新. (2010). “新教育”学校文化: 让学校之魂“活出来”. 中小学管理,(8),53—55.
[24]	朱永新. (2017). 家校合作激活教育磁场—新教育实验“家校合作共育”的理论与实践. 教育研究,38(11),75—80.
[25]	Asha, G., Tracy, Catherine, E. W., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2013). Examining the link between bullying behaviors and perceptions of safety and belonging among secondary school students. Journal of School Psychology, 51(4), 469—485. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.004
[26]	Astin, A W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(4), 297—308.
[27]	Brooks, G. J., & Duncan G. J. (1997). The Effects of Poverty on Children. Future of Children, 7(2), 55—71. doi: 10.2307/1602387
[28]	Bradley, R.H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 21(3), 371—399.
[29]	Dorian, W. (2004). The Interface of School Climate and School Connectedness and Relationships with Aggression and Victimization. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 293—299. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08286.x
[30]	Dragica, P. B. & Baucal, A. (2011). The Big Improvement in PISA 2009 Reading Achievements in Serbia: Improvement of the Quality of Education or Something Else?. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 1(3), 53—74.
[31]	David, S. D., Marion, S. F., & Charles R. M. (1999). Parenting of divorced mothers as a link between social status and boys’ academic outcomes: unpacking the effects of socioeconomic status. Child Development, 70(5), 1231—1245. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00089
[32]	IEA. (2011). Derived from: https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/index.html.
[33]	John, B., David, K., & Doris, Y. L. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British journal of educational psychology, 71(1), 133—149. doi: 10.1348/000709901158433
[34]	Sibley, E., & Dearing, E. (2014). Family educational involvement and child achievement in early elementary school for American-born and immigrant families. Psychology in the Schools, 51(8), 814—831. doi: 10.1002/pits.21784