Research on Competency of Teaching-research Officers: Construction and Application of Multi Structure Level Model

Luo Shengquan; Zhao Jiali

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.05.004

Volume 39 Issue 5

May 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences) > 2021 > 39(5): 68-84

Luo Shengquan, Zhao Jiali. Research on Competency of Teaching-research Officers: Construction and Application of Multi Structure Level Model[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(5): 68-84. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.05.004

Citation:

Luo Shengquan, Zhao Jiali. Research on Competency of Teaching-research Officers: Construction and Application of Multi Structure Level Model[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(5): 68-84. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.05.004

Citation:

PDF( 1124 KB)

Research on Competency of Teaching-research Officers: Construction and Application of Multi Structure Level Model

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.05.004

Center for Studies of Education and Psychology of Ethnic Minorities/Faculty of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

Publish Date: 2021-05-20

Abstract

Abstract

Teaching-research officers play an important role in teaching reform of basic education, improved quality of regional education and the transformation and development of teaching research. Their competency level can directly affect the teaching-research system, teaching-research theory or teaching-research practice, and determine the construction of teaching-research system with Chinese characteristics. In order to identify the professional characteristics and outstanding professional performance of teaching-research officers, their competency structure was difined, based on mathematical evidence-based thinking and combined with behavioral event interview, questionnaire survey and other methods. Also, a theoretical model of teaching-research officers' competency was constructed, including professional knowledge, curriculum construction, teaching development, scientific research, organizational leadership and professional quality. Then we used this model to explore the development level and function mechanism of teaching-research officers. We find that they are generally competent for teaching and research work, outstanding in professional quality, teaching development and organizational leadership, but with unstable performance in curriculum construction and scientific research. In order to confirm the different performance of the competency development, under the guidance of big data concept and algorithm thinking, we used cluster analysis, correlation analysis, regression analysis and other methods to explore the sample data. It is found that there are obvious differences in competency development among teaching-research officers and there are three types of officers: "passive and survival ", "happy and potential" and "active and strong". In addition, the mechanism of faculty member competency is also clarified. It's found that faculty member self-efficacy has a direct impact on competency, and organizational climate mainly affects competency through faculty member self-efficacy. At present, in order to promote the innovative application of the competency model, we can focus on the construction of teaching-research theory discourse system with Chinese characteristics, meet the development requirements of teaching-research system of basic education in the new era. It's also important to improve the in-out mechanism of “selection, evaluation and appointment” and support the transformation of teaching-research officers with high-quality professional and innovative vision.
- teaching-research officers,
- competency,
- teaching and research,
- self-efficacy,
- organizational climate

FullText(HTML)

References(33)

References

[1]	段锦云, 王娟娟, 朱月龙. (2014). 组织氛围研究: 概念测量、理论基础及评价展望. 心理科学进展,(12),1964—1974.
[2]	弗莱德•R•多尔迈. (1992). 主体性的黄昏. (万俊人等译).上海: 上海人民出版社.
[3]	金冬梅. (2012). 组织气氛对人力资源管理的影响研究. 北京: 经济科学出版社.
[4]	梁威, 卢立涛, 黄冬芳. (2010). 中国特色基础教育教学研究制度的发展. 教育研究,(12),77—82.
[5]	梁威, 卢立涛, 黄冬芳. (2011). 撬动中国基础教育的支点: 中国特色教研制度发展研究. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
[6]	刘文君. (2007). 美国现行教学督导系统及其特征. 比较教育研究,(7),12—16.
[7]	刘小平. (2011). 员工组织承诺的形成过程: 内部机制和外部影响—基于社会交换理论的实证研究. 管理世界,(11),92—104.
[8]	刘旭东, 花文凤. (2017). 迈向承认: 教研员的行动旨归. 西北师大学报(社会科学版),(4),76—81.
[9]	罗生全, 孟宪云. (2017). 教研员胜任力初探. 教育研究,(9),124—130.
[10]	钱旭升, 方晨阳. (2019). 中小学教研员自我效能的内在结构与水平特征. 教育研究,(12),59—66.
[11]	钱一呈. (2006). 外国教育督导与评价制度研究. 北京: 中央广播电视大学出版社.
[12]	任学宝. (2017). 教研的转型方向与使命. 课程•教材•教法,(4),15—18.
[13]	苏锦旗, 薛惠锋, 詹海亮. (2009). 基于划分的K-均值初始聚类中心优化算法. 微电子学与计算机,(1),8—11.
[14]	田慧生. (2014). 从传统教研向现代教研转变. 人民教育,(22),1-1.
[15]	王艳玲, 胡惠闵. (2019). 基础教育教研工作转型: 理念倡导与实践创新. 全球教育展望,(12),31—37.
[16]	温忠麟,叶宝娟. (2014). 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展,(5),731—745.
[17]	吴明隆. (2010). 问卷统计分析实务——SPSS操作与应用. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社.
[18]	徐建平. (2004). 教师胜任力模型测评与研究. 北京师范大学博士学位论文.
[19]	张行涛, 李玉平. (2003). 走进校本教研. 北京: 开明出版社.
[20]	张焕庭. (1989). 教育辞典. 南京: 江苏教育出版社.
[21]	张若勇, 刘新梅, 沈力, 王海珍. (2009). 服务氛围与一线员工服务绩效: 工作压力和组织认同的调节效应研究. 南开管理评论,(3),4—11.
[22]	赵佳丽, 罗生全. (2020). 中小学教研员胜任力调查研究. 课程•教材•教法,(6),137—143.
[23]	赵佳丽. (2017). 中学语文教研员胜任力调查研究. 西南大学硕士学位论文.
[24]	中华人民共和国教育部. (2001). 基础教育课程改革纲要(试行).
[25]	中华人民共和国教育部. (2019). 教育部关于加强和改进新时代基础教育教研工作的意见.
[26]	仲理峰, 时勘. （2003）. 胜任特征研究的新进展.南开管理评论, （2）, 4—8.
[27]	周文叶, 陈铭洲. (2016). 寻找支点: 用影响力资本撬动中国教研创新—全国首届教研创新论坛综述. 教育发展研究,(20),81—84.
[28]	Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, (5), 1—43.
[29]	Muchinsky, P. M. (1976). An assessment of the Litwin and Stringer organization climate questionnaire: An empirical and theoretical extension of the Sims and LaFollette study. Personnel psychology, (29), 371—392.
[30]	Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual review of psychology, (64), 361—388.
[31]	Sims, H. P., & LaFollette, W. (1975). An assessment of the Litwin and Stringer organization climate questionnaire. Personnel psychology, (1), 19—38.
[32]	Spencer, L. M. & Spencer, S. M.(1993). Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[33]	Tubbs, S. L., & Schulz, E. (2006). Exploring a taxonomy of global leadership competencies and meta-competencies. Journal of American Academy of Business, (2), 29—34.