An Issue of Teaching Critical Thinking: Argument or Inquiry？Insights from Russell, Dewey and Toulmin

Zhang Liuhua

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.06.006

Volume 39 Issue 6

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences) > 2021 > 39(6): 71-81

Zhang Liuhua. An Issue of Teaching Critical Thinking: Argument or Inquiry？Insights from Russell, Dewey and Toulmin[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(6): 71-81. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.06.006

Citation:

Zhang Liuhua. An Issue of Teaching Critical Thinking: Argument or Inquiry？Insights from Russell, Dewey and Toulmin[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(6): 71-81. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.06.006

Citation:

PDF( 813 KB)

An Issue of Teaching Critical Thinking: Argument or Inquiry？Insights from Russell, Dewey and Toulmin

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.06.006

Zhang Liuhua

Department of Philosophy, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

Publish Date: 2021-06-01

Abstract

Abstract

Russell’s critique against Dewey’s new logic in the early 20^th century is a symbol of some controversy over the orientation of critical thinking training. This article sets out from a conception of argument popular in earlier analytic philosophy, exemplified by the Principle of Clifford, and thereby examines the historical quarrel over “inquiry” between Russell and Dewey and its embarrassing outcome. After introducing the new conception of argument propounded eminently by Stephen Toulmin and embedding it in Dewey’s theory of inquiry, it is showed in what sense Russell’s criticism against Dewey was based upon some serious misunderstanding of Dewey’s methodology as well as of his key texts. At last, for the viewpoint of philosophy of education, this article suggests that the conception of argument-as-inquiry has the advantage of emphasizing arguers’ engaging in a variety of living experience and warning them against converting academic arguments into some sort of linguistic games.
- argument,
- inquiry,
- critical thinking,
- ideas of education

FullText(HTML)

References(24)

References

[1]	张留华. (2016). 哲学语言及其术语伦理. 中国社会科学,(12),41—59.
[2]	张留华. (2020). 信念规范的经济之维: 对“实用性”的一种解读. 社会科学,(9),112—123.
[3]	Clifford, W. K. (2011). Lectures and Essays, volume 2, edited by Leslie Stephen and Frederick Pollock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[4]	Dewey, J. (1916). Essays in Experimental Logic. New York: Dover Publications.
[5]	Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
[6]	Dewey, J. (1941). Propositions, Warranted Assertibility, and Truth. The Journal of Philosophy, 38(7), 169—186.
[7]	Dewey, J. (1958). “Experience, Knowledge and Value: A Rejoinder”, in The Philosophy of John Dewey, edited by P. A. Schilpp. New York: Tudor Publishing Company, 515−608.
[8]	Gale, R. (1959). Russell’s Drill Sergeant and Bricklayer and Dewey’s Logic. The Journal of Philosophy, 56(9), 401—406.
[9]	Haack, S. (1997). “‘The Ethics of Belief’ Reconsidered”, in The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm, edited by Lewis Edwin Hahn. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court, 129−144.
[10]	Hurley, P. J. (2015). A Concise Introduction to Logic. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
[11]	Hunter, D. A. (2014). A Practical Guide to Critical Thinking: Deciding What to Do and Believe. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
[12]	James, W. (1956). The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. New York: Dover.
[13]	James, W. (1995). Pragmatism. New York: Dover.
[14]	Johnston, J. S. (2009). Deweyan Inquiry: From Educational Theory to Practice. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
[15]	Madigan, T. J. (2009). W. K. Clifford and “The Ethics of Belief”. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
[16]	Monk, R. (1996). Bertrand Russell: The Spirit of Solitude (1872—1921). New York: The Free Press.
[17]	Russell, B. (1910). Philosophical Essays. London: Longmans, Green.
[18]	Russell, B. (1958). “Dewey’s New Logic”, in The Philosophy of John Dewey, edited by P. A. Schilpp. New York: Tudor Publishing Company, 135−156.
[19]	Russell, B. (1995). An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth. London and New York: Routledge.
[20]	Russell, B. (1996). History of Western Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge.
[21]	Russell, B. (1997). “The Spirit of Inquiry”, in The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Vol. 11. London: Routledge, 432−440.
[22]	Toulmin, S., R. Rieke and A. Janik. (1984). An Introduction to Reasoning. New York: Macmillan.
[23]	Toulmin, S. E. (2001). Return to Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
[24]	Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.