中国人文社会科学核心期刊

中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊

中文核心期刊

Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 39 Issue 6
Jun.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Zhang Shoudeng, Guo Congbin. Paper-setting of China’s College Entrance Examination: National or Provincial? Study on County-and Municipal-level Senior High School Students’ Fair Opportunities to Be Admitted into Elite Universities[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(6): 99-111. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.06.009
Citation: Zhang Shoudeng, Guo Congbin. Paper-setting of China’s College Entrance Examination: National or Provincial? Study on County-and Municipal-level Senior High School Students’ Fair Opportunities to Be Admitted into Elite Universities[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(6): 99-111. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.06.009

Paper-setting of China’s College Entrance Examination: National or Provincial? Study on County-and Municipal-level Senior High School Students’ Fair Opportunities to Be Admitted into Elite Universities

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.06.009
  • Publish Date: 2021-06-01
  • County-level senior high schools provide education opportunities for people living in counties or lower administrative level, which accounts for nearly half of the total population in China. The paper-setting of the college entrance examination (CEE) has a direct impact on the opportunities for county-level senior high school students to enter elite universities. This study, based on data from elite university A’s undergraduate students from 2000 to 2018, used a two-way fixed-effect model to probe into the two reforms of paper-setting of the CEE and found that in the reform of “From National to Provincial”, provincial autonomous paper-setting significantly reduced the opportunities for county-level senior high school students to enter elite universities, while it also made the distribution of admission opportunities more balanced across high schools. In the reform of “From Provincial to National”, the two methods had no significant difference. The current form of national paper-setting with sub-versions ensured a balanced distribution of admission opportunities and successfully adapted to the different education levels among different regions. Meanwhile, the implementation of targeted enrollment plan in poor areas improved the admission opportunities of elite universities for county-level high school students. Therefore, the combination of the new form of national unified paper-setting of CEE and the targeted enrollment plan in poverty-stricken areas can guarantee the equality of educational opportunities from multiple dimensions.
  • loading
  • [1]
    戴思源. (2018). 大学扩招、重点学校与城乡高等教育不平等(1978—2014). 教育与经济,(2),18—26+61. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1003-4870.2018.02.003
    [2]
    范皑皑, 丁小浩. (2013). 谁的文凭贬值了—分割的劳动力市场视角下的过度教育问题研究. 教育发展研究,(17),7—14.
    [3]
    樊本富, 韩福山. (2015). 关于我国高考制度改革的调查研究. 教育与考试,(06),22—28. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1973-7865.2015.06.004
    [4]
    郭丛斌, 王家齐. (2018). 我国精英大学的生源究竟在何方—以A大学和B大学2013级生源为例. 教育研究,(12),99—108.
    [5]
    郭丛斌, 张首登, 万博绅. (2020). 中国高考难度: 大些好, 还是小些好—从县市高中学生精英大学入学机会公平的视角. 教育研究,(2),111—123.
    [6]
    李春玲. (2010). 高等教育扩张与教育机会不平等—高校扩招的平等化效应考查. 社会学研究,(3),82—113+244.
    [7]
    李丽, 赵文龙. (2014). 高校扩招背景下高中分流与教育机会公平研究. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),(5),100—106.
    [8]
    廉思. (2009). 蚁族: 大学毕业生聚居村实录. 南宁: 广西师范大学出版社.
    [9]
    柳博. (2017). 高考分省命题改革的回顾与启示. 江苏高教,(2),76—79.
    [10]
    刘海峰, 谷振宇. (2012). 小事件引发大改革—高考分省命题的由来与走向. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版),(5),16—20.
    [11]
    刘亮. (2016). 高考命题公平性探研. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版),(6),105—110.
    [12]
    刘善槐, 贾盼盼. (2013). 我国农村普通高中的生存困境与出路. 教育发展研究,(22),33—36.
    [13]
    刘云杉, 王志明, 杨晓芳. (2009). 精英的选拔: 身份、地域与资本的视角—跨入北京大学的农家子弟(1978-2005. 清华大学教育研究,(5),42—59. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1001-4519.2009.05.006
    [14]
    孙锦明. (2004). 高考分省自主命题的理性思考. 当代教育科学,(24),21—24. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1672-2221.2004.24.006
    [15]
    谭俊英, 邹媛. (2016). 省域内普通高中教育投入差距测度与分析—基于西部A省3县的调查. 教育导刊,(10),45—49.
    [16]
    王后雄. (2009). “高考城市化倾向”的成因及矫正. 教育发展研究,(5),11—17.
    [17]
    王后雄, 王世存. (2011). 不同利益群体对高考制度公平性认同度的调查与分析. 教育测量与评价(理论版),(09),4—18.
    [18]
    文军, 顾楚丹. (2017). 基础教育资源分配的城乡差异及其社会后果—基于中国教育统计数据的分析. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),(2),33—42.
    [19]
    吴晓刚. (2016). 中国当代的高等教育、精英形成与社会分层—来自“首都大学生成长追踪调查”的初步发现. 社会,(3),1—31.
    [20]
    谢冬平. (2018). 公平视域下全国命题与分省命题的博弈. 现代大学教育,(1),85—92. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1671-1610.2018.01.012
    [21]
    薛海平, 唐一鹏. (2016). 我国普通高中教育经费投入: 现状、问题与建议. 教育学报,(4),89—101.
    [22]
    叶晓阳, 丁延庆. (2015). 扩张的中国高等教育: 教育质量与社会分层. 社会,(3),193—220.
    [23]
    应星, 刘云杉. (2015). “无声的革命”: 被夸大的修辞与梁晨、李中清等的商榷. 社会,(2),81—93.
    [24]
    余秀兰. (2019). 关注质量与结果: 我国教育公平的新追求. 南京师范大学学报(社会科学版),(1),29—38.
    [25]
    翟博, 孙百才. (2012). 中国基础教育均衡发展实证研究报告. 教育研究,(5),22—30.
    [26]
    张敏强, 王小婷, 徐桃. (2013). 关于高考分省命题存废的探讨—教育与心理测量学的专业视角. 中国考试,(8),3—8. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1005-8427.2013.08.001
    [27]
    郑若玲. (2005). 高考改革必须凸显公平. 教育研究,(3),36—37.
    [28]
    郑若玲. (2011). 苦旅何以得纾解——高考改革困境与突破. 南京: 江苏教育出版社.
    [29]
    周光礼, 姜尚峰. (2017). 高考改革40年: 意义建构与制度变迁. 复旦教育论坛,(6),5—12. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1672-0059.2017.06.002
    [30]
    周文阔. (2014). 分省命题横向比较价值降低的原因分析和对策研究. 当代教育科学,(14),48—50. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1672-2221.2014.14.014
    [31]
    Zhang, J., Jin, S., Torero, M., & Li, T. (2018). Teachers and Urban-Rural Gaps in Educational Outcomes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 100(4), 1207—1223. doi:  10.1093/ajae/aay009
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(3)

    Article views (570) PDF downloads(28) Cited by()
    Proportional views

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return