中国人文社会科学核心期刊
中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊
中文核心期刊
Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!
| Name | |
|---|---|
| Phone | |
| Title | |
| |
| [1] |
陈惠邦: 《教育行动研究》, 台湾师大书苑有限公司, 1998年.
|
| [2] |
蔡清田: 《教育行动研究》, 台湾五南图书出版公司, 2000年.
|
| [3] |
张嘉育: 《认识学校本位课程发展》, 载课程与教学学会编: 《学校本位课程与教学创新》, 台湾扬智文化事业股份有限公司, 1998年.
|
| [4] |
黄显华: 《"以学校为本位课程发展"性质的探究》, 载黄显华编著: 《强迫普及学校教育﹔制度与课程》, 香港中文大学出版社, 1997年.
|
| [5] |
黄显华、刘润牛: 《强迫普及教育实施后香港课程设计的发展》, 载黄显华编著: 《强迫普及学校教育: 制度与课程》, 香港中文大学出版社, 1997年.
|
| [6] |
吴刚平: 《论校本课程开发》, 上海华东师范大学博士学位论文, 2000年.
|
| [7] |
徐玉珍: 《群体审议--─教师参与学校课程决策的一个参考框架》, 载《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》1995年第4期.
|
| [8] |
C.Adelman, (1997).Action Rescarch; The Problem ofParticipation.In Robin McTaggart(Ed.).Participatory Action Research: International Contexts and Consequences.State University of New York Press.
|
| [9] |
C.Argyris, R.Putnam, & D.M.Smith, (1985). Action Science. Jossye-Bass Publishers.
|
| [10] |
J.F. Baumann. (1996).Conflict or Compatibility in Classroom Inquiry?One Teacher's Struggle to Balance Teaching and Research. Fducational Researcher, Vol.25, No.7, pp.29- 36.
|
| [11] |
M. Ben-Peretz, (1975). The Conceptof Curriculum Potential.Curriculun Theory Network, Vol.5, No.2, pp.151 - 159.
|
| [12] |
J.Biggs, & K.Collis, (1989). Towards a Model of School-based Curriculum Development and Assessment Using the SOLO Taxonomy.Australian Journal of Education, Vol.33, No.2, pp.151- 163.
|
| [13] |
L.Brady, (1987). Explaining School-based Curricu-lum Satisfaction: A Case Study.Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol.19, No.4, pp.375- 378.
|
| [14] |
G.Bunaford, (1996).A Life of lts Own: Teacher Research and Transforming the Curriculum. In Gail Burraford, Joseph Fischer & David Hobson (1996). Teachers Doing
|
| [15] |
Rescarch: Practical Possiblilitics.New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
|
| [16] |
F.Carr, & S.Kemmis, (1986). Becoming Critical.Deakin University Press.
|
| [17] |
D.J.Clandinin & F.M.Connelly, (1995). Teachers'Professional Knowledge Landscapes. Teachers CollegePress.
|
| [18] |
R.W. Chinn, (1998). 'Teacher-Student Action Research: AnsweringMelissa'sQucstion. Teachingand Change, Vol.5, No.2, pp.99-115.
|
| [19] |
F.M.Connelly, & D.J.Clandinin, (1988). Teachers as Curriculum Planners: Narratives of Experience. OISE & Teachers College Press.
|
| [20] |
H.Cooper, (1996). Speaking Power to Truth: Reflection of an Educational Researcher After 4 Years of School Board Service. Educational Researcher, Vol.25, No.1, pp·29-34.
|
| [21] |
Z.Dornyei & A.Malderez, (1997). Group Dynanics and Foreign Language Teaching. System, Vol. 25, No.1, pp.65-81.
|
| [22] |
J.Elliott, (1991). Action Research for Education Change.Open University Press.
|
| [23] |
J.Elliott, (1997). School-based Curriculum Development and Action Rescarch in the United Kingdom. In Sandra Hollingworth(Ed.). International Action Research: ACasebook for Educational Reform. Falmer Press.
|
| [24] |
s.Crundy, (1982). Three Modes of Action Research.In Stephen Kermis & Robin McTaggart (1989) (Eds.).The Action Rescarch Reader (3t'Ed). Deakin UniversityPress.
|
| [25] |
A.Hargreaves, (1982). The Rhetoric of School-Centred Innovation.Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol.14, No.3, pp.251- 266.
|
| [26] |
R.D.Hawthorne, (1990). Analyaing School-Based Collaborative Curiculum Decision Making. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, Vol.5, No.3, pp.279- 286.
|
| [27] |
S.Keiny & T.Weiss, (1986). A Case Study 'of a School-based Curriculum Development as a Model for INSET.Journal of Education for Teaching, Vol.12, No.2, pp.155-162.
|
| [28] |
S.Kemmis & R.McTaggart, (1982). The Action Research Planner. Deakin University.
|
| [29] |
K.J.Kennedy, (1992). School-based Curriculum Developrment as a Policy Option for the 1990s: An Australian Perspective.Joumal of Curriculum and Supervision, Vol.7, No.2, pp.180 -195.
|
| [30] |
P.Knight, (1985). The Practice of School-based Curriculum Development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol.17, No.!, pp.37- 48.
|
| [31] |
K.Lewin, (1946a). Action Rescarch and Minority Problems.In Gertrud Weiss Lewin(1997)(Ed.)Resolvingsocial conflicts; &, Field theory in social science.Washing-tor, DC: American Psychological Association.
|
| [32] |
K.Lewin, (1946b).The Dynamics of Croup Action.In Martin Gold(1999)(Ed.). Te Complete Social Scientist: AKurt Lewin Reader. Washington, D.C. : American Psycho-logical Association.
|
| [33] |
K. Lewin, (1948). Group Decision and Social Change. In Martin Gold(1999)(Ed.).The Complete Social Scicntist: A Kurt Lewin Reader.Washington, D.C. : American Psychological Association.
|
| [34] |
C.Marsh, C. Day, L. Harnay, & C.McCutcheon, (1990). Reconceptuaizing School-based Curriculurm Developrment. Falmer Press.
|
| [35] |
G.McCutcheon & B.Jung, (1990).Altemative Perspectives on Action Rescarch.Theory Into Practice, Vol.29, No.3, pp.144-151.
|
| [36] |
J.McKernan,(1988). The Countenance of Curriculurn Action Research:Traditional, Collaorative , and Emancipatory-Critical Conceptions.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,Vol.3,No.3,pp.173- 200.
|
| [37] |
J.McKernan, ( 1991). Curriculum Action Hesearch.NY:St.Martin's Press.
|
| [38] |
J.McNif,( 1988). Action Research:Principles and Practice.Routledge.
|
| [39] |
J.McNiff,P.Loax,&J.Whitehead, ( 1996). You and Your Action esearch Project.London & NY: Routledgc & Hyde Publications.
|
| [40] |
C.E.Mills,(2000). Action Research: A Cuide for the Teacher Researchcr.New Youk & Ohio:Merrill.
|
| [41] |
J.E. Miller,J. Trimbur,&J.M.Wilkes,( 1994 ).Group Dynamics :Understanding Group Success and Failurein Collaborative Learning.New Directions for Teaching ard earming,No.59,pp.33-44.
|
| [42] |
OECD ( 1979 ). School-BasedCuriculum Developrment . OECD.
|
| [43] |
S.N.Oja,& L.Smulyan,(1989).Collaborative ActionResearch: A Developrmertal Approach.Falmer Press.
|
| [44] |
P.0.Okunrotifa,( 1971). Curriculum Improvement through Action Research.Teacher Education in New Countries,Vol.12,No.2,pp.153- 163.
|
| [45] |
M.Print, ( 1993). Curriculum Developrnent and Design(2ed. ). Allen& Unwin.
|
| [46] |
N.Sabar, ( 1983) . Towards School-based Curricuum Development :TrainingSchool Curriculum Co-ordinators .Journal af Curiculurn Studies,Vol.15,No.4,pp.431-434.
|
| [47] |
N.Sabar, ( 1985). School-based Curriculum Developmert : eflections from an InternationalSeminar . Jounal of Curriculum Studies,Vol.17,No.4, pp.452- 454.
|
| [48] |
R.A.Schmuck, ( 1997). Practical Action Research For Change.IRI/Skylght Training & Publishing Ic.
|
| [49] |
M.Skilbeck,( 1983).School-based Curriculum Development . In V.Lee&D.Zeldin ( Eds. ). Planning the Curriculurm. London:Hodder &Stoughton.
|
| [50] |
L.Stenhouse, ( 1975). An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development.London:Heinemann.
|
| [51] |
L.Stenhouse,( 1980) ( Ed.).Curiculum Research and Development in Action.Heinemann Eucational Books .
|
| [52] |
E.T.Stringer,( 1999). Action Research(2l edl. ) .Sage Publications.
|
| [53] |
M.M.Van.( 1990). Beyord Assumptions :Shifting the Lamits ofAction Rescarch.Theory Into Practiced,Vol.29,No.3,pp.152-157:
|
| [54] |
W.F. Whyte,( 1991)(Ed.).Participatory Action Research.SACE Publications.
|
| [55] |
s.Wilson, ( 1995). Not Tension but Intention: A Response to Wong's Analysis of the Researcher/Teacher.Educational Research, Vol.24,No.3,pp.22- 28.
|
| [56] |
E.D.Wong, ( 1995b).Challenges Confronting the ResearcherTeacher :Conflicts of Purpose and Conduct.Educational Researcher,Vol.24,No.3, pp.22- 28.
|
| [57] |
E.D.Wong, ( 1995b). Challenges Confrorting the ResearcherTeacher : A Rejainder to Wilson . Educational Researcher,Vol.24,No.8,pp.22- 23.
|
| [58] |
Zubert-Skerritt ( 1991)(Ed.). Action Research for Change and Development . Avebury.
|
Figures(4)
DownLoad:
